Cardiac rehabilitation patient versus proxy quality-of-life perceptions

Clinical Nursing Research

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 282-293

  Phillips, Wayne T ^a   Alexander, Jeffrey L ^a   Pepin, Veronique ^a   Riley, Cathy ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Lutheran Heart Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac rehabilitation outcomes; Physical functioning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCEPTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPOUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CUSTODY; HEART DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CONCEPT; UNITED STATES;

AGED; ARIZONA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERCEPTION; PROXY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF EFFICACY; SPOUSES;

EID: 0042914624     PISSN: 10547738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1054773803254431     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. (1999). Guidelines for CR and secondary prevention programs. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
2. Andresen, E. M., Vahle, V. J., & Lollar, D. (2001). Proxy reliability: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures for people with disability. Quality of Life Research, 10, 609-619.
3. Daltroy, L. H., & Godin, G. (1989). The influence of spousal approval and patient perception of spousal approval on cardiac patients' participation in exercise programs. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 9, 363-367.
4. Epstein, A. M., Hall, J. A., Tognetti, J., Son, L. H., & Conant, L. (1989). Using proxies to evaluate quality of life: Can they provide valid information about patient's health status and satisfaction with medical care? Medical Care, 27, S91-S98.
5. Fiske, V., Coyne, J. C., & Smith, D. A. (1991). Couples coping with myocardial infarction: An empirical reconsideration of the role of overprotectiveness. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 209-215.
6. Guyatt, G. H., Feeny, D. H., & Patrick, D. L. (1993). Measuring health related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine, 118, 622-629.
7. Keller, S. D., Bayliss, M. S., Ware, J. E., Hsu, M. A., Damiano, A. M., & Goss, T. F. (1997). Comparison of responses to SF-36 health survey questions with one-week and 4-week recall periods. Health Services Research, 32, 367-384.
8. Magaziner, J., Simonsick, E. M., Kashner, T. M., & Hebel, J. R. (1988). Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health status and functional status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41, 1065-1074.
9. Mayou, R., Foster, A., & Williamson, B. (1978). Psychological adjustment in patients one year after myocardial infarction. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 22, 447-453.
10. McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Test of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32, 40-66.
11. Oldridge, N. B. (1997). Outcome assessment in cardiac rehabilitation. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 17, 179-194.
12. Pearlman, R. A., & Uhlmann, R. G. (1988). Quality of life in chronic diseases: Perceptions of elderly patients. Journals of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 43, M25-M30.
13. Pierre, U., Wood, S., Korner, N., Gayton, D., & Hanley, J. (1998). Proxy use of the Canadian SF 36 in rating health status of the disabled elderly. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 983-990.
14. Rogers, J., Ridley, S., Chrispin, P., Scotton, H., & Lloyd, D. (1997). Reliability of the next of kins' estimates of critically ill patients' quality of life. Anasthesia, 52, 1137-1143.
15. Skelton, E., & Dominian, J. (1973). Psychological stress in wives of patients with myocardial infarction. British Medical Journal, 2, 1690-1685.
16. Slevin, M. L., Plant, H., Drinkwater, J., & Gregory, W. M. (1988). Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? British Journal of Cancer, 57, 109-112.
17. Sneeuw, K. C., Aaronson, N. K., Osoba, D., Muller, M. J., Hsu, M. A., Yung, W. K., et al. (1997). The use of significant others as proxy raters of the quality of life of patients with brain cancer. Medical Care, 35, 490-506.
18. Sneeuw, K. C., Aaronson, N. K., Sprangers, M. A., Detmar, S. B., Wever, L. D., & Schornagel, J. H. (1998). Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 617-631.
19. Sprangers, M. A. G., & Aaronson, N. K. (1992). The role of health care providers and others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 7, 743-760.
20. Stancliffe, R. J. (1999). Proxy respondents and the reliability of the Quality of Life Questionnaire empowerment factor. Journal of Intellectual and Disability Research, 3, 85-93.
21. Tamim, H., McCusker, J., & Dendukuri, N. (2002). Proxy reporting of quality of life using the EQ-5D. Medical Care, 40, 1186-1195.
22. Taylor, C. B., Bandura, A., Ewart, C. K., Miller, N. H., & Debusk, R. F. (1985). Exercise testing to enhance wives confidence in their husband's cardiac capability soon after clinically uncomplicated myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 55, 635-638.
23. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
24. Wiklund, J. (1990). Measuring quality of life in medicine. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Supplement, 1, 11-14.
25. Yip, J. Y., Wilber, K. H., Myrtle, R. C., & Grazman, D. N. (2001). Comparison of older adult subject and proxy responses on the SF-36 health-related quality of life instrument. Aging and Mental Health, 5, 136-142.