IS SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE PROSODICALLY RETRIEVABLE?

5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, EUROSPEECH 1997

Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages KN01-KN08

  Rossi, Mario ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

BOUNDARY STRENGTHS; MATCHING RULES; PROSODIC STRUCTURE; PROSODICS; SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE; THREE-COMPONENT; THREE-LEVEL MODELS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 0042895379     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Beckman, M. E. and Cohen K.B.(1997), Modelling the articulatory dynamics of two levels of stress contrast, in Horne (forthcoming).
2. Beckman, M.E. and Edwards, J. (1990), Lenghtenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency, in J. Kingston and M.E. Beckman (eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I, 152-178.
3. Bierwish, M. (1966), Regeln für die Intonation deutscher Sätze, Studia Grammatica, 7, 92-102.
4. Bruce, G., Granström, B., Gustafson, K. and House, D. (1992), Interaction of Fo and duration in the perception of prosodic phrasing in Swedish, Nordic Prosody, VI, 7-22.
5. Caelen, G., (ed.), Prosodie et reconnaissance, C.C.A.I., (forthcoming).
6. Campbell, N., (1993), Automatic detection of prosodic boundaries in speech, Speech Communication 13, 3-4, 343-355.
7. Carbonnel, N., Haton, J.P., Lonchamp, F. et Pierrel, J.M.(1982), Indices prosodiques pour l'analyse syntaxico-sémantique dans Myrtille II, Actes du Séminaire Prosodie et Reconnaissance, Aix, 59-91.
8. Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968), The sound pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.
9. Cooper, W. and Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980), Syntax and speech, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Di Cristo, A. (1981), L'intonation est congruente à la syntaxe, in M. Rossi et al.(1981), 272-289.
11. Di Cristo, A. (1985), Publications de l'Université de Provence.
12. Gr nnum, N., (1992), The ground-works of Danish intonation, Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhague.
13. Gussenhoven, C. (1983), Focus, mode and the nucleus, Journal of Linguistics, 19, 377-4 17.
14. Haegeman, L. (1994), Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
15. Hirst, D. (1993), Detaching intonational phrases from syntactic structure, Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 781-788.
16. Horne, M. (ed.), Prosody: Theory and Experiment, Kluwer, Dordrech, (forthcoming);
17. Hunt, A. (1997), Training prosody-syntax recognition models without prosodic labels, in Y. Sagisaka, et al. (eds.), 1119-1122.
18. Klatt, D.H. (1975), Vowel lenghtening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse, Journal of Phonetics, 3, 3, 129-140.
19. Kohler, K. J., (1997), Modelling prosody in spontaneous speech, in Sagisaka et al., 187-210.
20. Ladd, B. and Campbell, D.R. (1991), Theories of prosodic structure: evidence from syllable duration, Proc. ISPHS 1991, 290-293.
21. Ladd, D.Robert (1996), Intonational Phonology, Cambridge University Press.
22. Lea, W.A. (1972), Intonational cues to the constituent structure and phonemics of spoken English, Ph. D. Dissertation, Purdue University.
23. Lea, W.A. (1980), Prosodic aids to speech recognition, in W.A. Lea (ed.), Trends in speech recognition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
24. Lehiste, I. (1973), Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity, Glossa, 7, 2, 107-121.
25. Martin, Ph. (1981), L'intonation est-elle congruente à la syntaxe ?, in Rossi et al. (1981), 234ff.
26. Meloni, H. et Guizol, J. (1982), Utilisation de paramètres suprasegmentaux en reconnaissance automatique de la parole continue, Actes du Séminaire Prosodie et Reconnaissance, Aix, 93-119.
27. Mixdorff, H. and Fujisaki, H. (1995), Production and perception of statement, question, non-terminal intonation in German, Proc. ICPHS 95,II, 410-413.
28. Möbius, B. (1995), Components of a quantitative model of German intonation, Proc. ICPhS 95
29. Nespor, M. and Vogel, I. (1986), Prosodic Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht.
30. Ostendorf, M. and Veilleux, N. (1991), A hierarchical stochastic model for automatic prediction of prosodic boundary location, J.Acoust. Soc.Am., 90, 2275 (A).
31. Pierrehumbert, J., (1980), The phonology and phonetics of English intonation, PhD, (MIT), IULC (1988).
32. Pollock, J.Y. (1989), "Verb Movement, UG and the Structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 3, 365-424.
33. Price, P., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. and Fong, C. (1991), The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 90, 2956-2970.
34. Rossi, M., Di Cristo, A. Hirst, D., Martin, P., & Nishinuma, Y. (1981), L'Intonation, de l'acoustique à la sémantique (Klincksieck, Paris).
35. Rossi, M. (1993), A Model for Predicting the Prosody of Spontaneous Speech (PPSS Model), Speech Communication, 13, 87-107.
36. Rossi, M. (1995), A Principle-based Model for Predicting the Prosody of Speech, in Levels in Speech Communication Relations and Interactions, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 159-170.
37. Sagisaka, Y., Campbell, N. and Higuchi, N. (eds.), (1997), Computing prosody, Springer, Berlin
38. Sanderman, A.A. and Collier, R. (1996), Prosodic rules for the implementation of phrase boundaries in synthetic speech, J. Acous. Soc. Am., 100, 5, 3390-3397.
39. Selkirk, E. (1978), On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure, published in T. Fretheim (ed.), Nordic Prosody II, TAPIR, Trondheim, 1981, 111-140.
40. Selkirk, E. (1990), On the nature of prosodic constituency: comments on Beckman and Edwards paper, in J. Kingston and M.E. Beckman, Papers in Laboratory Phonology I, 179-200.
41. Selkirk, E. (1997), The interaction of constraints on prosodic phrasing, in Horne, (forthcoming)
42. Selkirk, E., O. (1984), Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass).
43. Speas, J.M. (1990), Phrase Structure in Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
44. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986), Relevance: communication and cognition.
45. Stockwell, R.P. (1960), The place of intonation in a generative grammar of English, Language, 36, 360-367.
46. Stockwell, R.P. (1972), The role of intonation: reconsiderations and other considerations, in D.L. Bolinger (ed.), Intonation, Penguin Books, 87-109.
47. Swerts, M. (1997), Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 101, 1, 514-521.
48. Vaissière, J. (1983), Une composante suprasegmentale dans un système de reconnaissance: réduction du nombre d'hypothèses lexicales et détection des frontières majeures, Recherches acoustiques, CNET, VII, 109-124.
49. Vincent, M., Di Cristo, A. and Hirst, D. (1995), Prosody feature of finality for intonation units in French discourse, Proc. ISPHS 95, II, 718-721.
50. Waibel, A. (1987), Prosodic knowledge sources for word hypothesization in a continuous speech recognition, Proc. ICASSP, Dallas, 856-859.
51. Wightman, C. W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M. and Price, P. (1992), Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 91, 1707-1717.