Comparison of feline nasal cavity dimensions measured by acoustic rhinometry and nasal casts

American Journal of Rhinology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 233-239

  Straszek, Sune P ^a   McLeod, Robbie L ^a   Hey, John A ^a   Mosekilde, Lis ^b   Pedersen, Ole F ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; BIOMATERIAL; COMPOUND 48-80; PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CAT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GEOMETRY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; NOSE CAVITY; NOSE MUCOSA; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; RHINOMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THICKNESS;

EID: 0042887019     PISSN: 10506586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/194589240301700410     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Pedersen OF, Yamagiwa M, Miyahara Y, et al. Nasal cavity dimensions in guinea pigs measured by acoustic reflections. Am J Rhinol 8:299-304, 1994.
2. Kaise T, Ohmori K, Sakakura Y, et al. The effect of KW-4679, an antiallergic drug, on experimental allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs: effects on nasal blockade. Jpn J Pharmacol 69:435-438, 1995.
3. Sakaguchi M, Mase A, Ikeda Y, et al. Effects of Sho-seiryu-to on experimental allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs. Exp Clin Pharmacol 21:303-308, 1999.
4. Ohkawa C, Ukai K, Miyahara Y, et al. Histamine H1 receptor and reactivity of the nasal mucosa in sensitized guinea pigs. Auris Nasus Larynx 26 293-298, 1999.
5. McLeod RL, Mingo GG, Herczku C, et al. Changes in nasal resistance and nasal geometry using pressure and acoustic rhinometry in a feline model of nasal congestion. Am J Rhinol 13:375-383, 1999.
6. Mcleod, RL Mingo GG, Herczku C, et al. Combined histamine H1 and H3 receptor blockade produces nasal decongestion in an experimental model of nasal congestion. Am J Rhinol 13:391-399, 1999.
7. Nakamato S, Sakakura Y, Pedersen OF, et al. Evaluation of nasal passage patency after antigen and histamine challenge in guinea pigs by acoustic rhinometry. Am J Rhinol 11:85-89, 1997.
8. Ohkawa C, Ukai K, Miyahara Y, et al. Acoustic rhinometry evaluation of nasal response to histamine and antigen in guinea pigs. Am J Rhinol 13:67-71, 1999.
9. Kaise T, Ukai K, Pedersen OF, et al. Accuracy of measurement of acoustic rhinometry applied to small experimental animals. Am J Rhinol 13:125-129, 1999.
10. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, et al. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 66:295-303, 1989.
11. Hilberg O, Pedersen OF, and Jackson AC. Acoustic rhinometry: a new approach to examining the nose. In Rhinitis and Asthma: Similarities and Differences. Mygind N, Pipcorn U, and Dahl R (Eds.). Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1990. 242-248.
12. Bland MJ, and Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8:307-311, 1986.
13. Hilberg O, and Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. Rhinol Suppl 16:3-18, 2000.