Endoscopic management of pseudocysts

Reviews in Gastroenterological Disorders

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 135-141

  Hawes, Robert H ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Endoscopic ultrasound; Endoscopy; Pancreatitis; Pseudocyst

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFECTION; PANCREAS PSEUDOCYST; PERFORATION; RECURRENT DISEASE; REVIEW; SURGICAL DRAINAGE;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; DRAINAGE; ENDOSCOPY, DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PANCREATIC PSEUDOCYST; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0042884266     PISSN: 1533001X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Kozarek RA, Brayko CM, Harlan J, et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst. Gastrointest Endosc. 1985;31:322-327.
2. Baron TH, Harewood GC, Morgan DE, Yates MR. Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:7-17.
3. Bradley EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Georgia, September 11-13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993;128:586-590.
4. Lehman GA. Pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49(3 part 2):S81-S84.
5. Fockens P, Johnson TG, van Dullemen HM, et al. Endosonographic imaging of pancreatic pseudocysts before endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;46:412-416.