Effects on rumen protozoa in cattle (in vitro). Part 2: Influence of a subclinical ruminal acidosis without and with thiamine supply;Einflüsse auf den ruminalen protozoenbesatz des rindes (in vitro): Teil 2: Wirkung einer subklinischen pansenazidose ohne und mit thiaminsubstitution

Tierarztliche Praxis Ausgabe G: Grosstiere - Nutztiere

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 178-182

  Höltershinken, Martin ^a   Höhling, Andrea ^a   Wendelken, Grietje ^a   Elias, Karen ^a   Scholz, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Effects of thiamine; Rumen protozoa; Rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC); Subclinical ruminal acidosis

Indexed keywords

THIAMINE;

ACIDOSIS; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CONTROL; DRUG EFFECT; FERMENTATION TECHNIQUE; NONHUMAN; PARASITE SURVIVAL; PROPHYLAXIS; PROTOZOAL INFECTION; PROTOZOON; RUMINANT STOMACH; SIMULATION; TECHNIQUE; VITAMIN SUPPLEMENTATION;

BOS TAURUS; PROTOZOA; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 0042879396     PISSN: 14341220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1622958     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Becker J. Untersuchungen zum Einflulß eines Pansenstimulans auf ruminale Fermentationsvorgänge des Rindes (in-vitro). Diss med vet, Hannover 1994.
2. Dawson KA, Newman KE, Boling JA. Effects of microbial supplements containing yeast and lactobacilli on roughage-fed ruminal microbial activities. J Anim Sci 1990; 68: 3392-8.
3. Dearth RN, Dehority BA, Potter EL. Rumen microbial numbers in lambs as affected by level of feed intake and dietary diethylstilbesterol. J Anim Sci 1974; 38: 991-6.
4. Frank A. Einfluß eines mit Fusarienspezies verdorbenen Heus auf Keimzahlen ruminaler Bakteriengruppen (in-vitro). Diss med vet, Hannover 1998.
5. Fuchigami M, Senshu T, Horiguchi M. A simple continuous culture system for rumen microbial digestion study and effects of defaunation and dilution rates. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72: 3070-8.
6. Gäbel G. Pansenazidose: Interaktionen zwischen den Veränderungen im Lumen und in der Wand des Pansens. Übers Tierernähr 1990; 128: 1-38.
7. Harmeyer J. Protozoologie des Pansen. In: Biologie und Biochemie der mikrobiellen Verdauung. Giesecke D, Hendericks HV, Hrsg. München, Bern, Wien: BLV 1973; 38-107.
8. Harrison GA, Hemken RW, Dawson KA, Harmon RJ, Barker KB. Influence of addition of yeast culture supplement to diets of lactating cows on ruminal fermentation and microbial population. J Dairy Sci 1988; 71: 2967-75.
9. Hillman K, Lloyd D, Williams AG. Interactions between the methanogen Methanosarcina barkeri and rumen holotrich ciliate protozoa. Lett Appl Microbiol 1988; 7: 49-53.
10. Höhling A, Höltershinken M, Hoffmann P, Scholz H. Einflüsse auf den ruminalen Protozoenbesatz des Rindes (in vitro). Teil 1: Wirkung von verpilztem Gras and Heu mit und ohne Thiaminzusatz. Tierärztl Prax 2001; 29 G: 284-90.
11. Krogh N. Studies on alteration in the rumen fluid of sheep, especially concerning the microbial composition, when readily available carbohydrates are added to the food. 1. Sucrose. Acta Vet Scand 1959; 1: 74-97.
12. Lyle RR, Johnson RR, Wilhite JV, Backus WR. Ruminal characteristics in steers as affected by adaptation from forage to all-concentrate diets. J Anim Sci 1981; 53: 1383-90.
13. Misra SK, Dash PK, Mohanty GP. The protozoan fauna of the rumen and reticulum of Indian cattle. Ind Vet J 1972; 49: 463-70.
14. Mitchell P. Coupling of phosphorylation to electron and hydrogen transfer by a chemiosmotic type of mechanism. Nature 1961; 191: 144.
15. Mould FL, Ørskov ER, Mann SO. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1983/84; 10: 15.
16. Newbold CJ, Chamberlain DG, Williams AG. The role of protozoa in lactic acidosis. Belfast: Proc 6th Int Conf Prod Disease Farm Anim 1986; 154-7.
17. Newbold CJ, Chamberlain DG, Williams AG. The effects of defaunation on the metabolism of lactic acid in the rumen. J Sci Feed Agric 1986; 37: 1083-90.
18. Newbold CJ, Chamberlain DG, Williams AG. The in vitro metabolism of D,L-lactic acid by rumen microorganisms. J Sci Feed Agric 1987; 38: 9-18.
19. Newbold CJ, Lassalas B, Jouany JP. The importance of methanogens associated with ciliate protozoa in ruminal methane production in vitro. Lett Appl Microbiol 1995; 21: 230-4.
20. Nienhoff H. Untersuchungen über die Pansenazidose des Rindes (Behandlungsversuche mit Tetrazyklinen). Diss med vet, Hannover 1968.
21. Ogimoto K, Imai S. Atlas of Rumen Microbiology. Tokyo: Jap Sci Soc Press 1981; 231.
22. Plitt U. Einfluß von verpilztem Gras auf intraruminale Fermentation und Thiaminstoffwechsel des Rindes (in-vitro). Diss med vet, Hannover 1995.
23. Randhawa SS, Ahujy AK, Rathor SS. Effects of lactic acidosis on microbial and biochemical changes in rumen liquor of buffalo-calves. Ind J Vet Med 1989; 9: 1-7.
24. Rossow N, Bergner H, Jacobi U. Pathophysiologische Aspekte der Kohlenhydratverwertung beim Wiederkäuer. Mh Vet Med 1980; 35: 866-72.
25. Russel JB, Sharp WM, Baldwin RL. The effect of pH on maximum bacterial growth rate and its possible role as a determinant of bacterial competition in rumen. J Anim Sci 1979; 48: 251-5.
26. Wells JE, Russel JB. Why do many ruminal bacteria die and lyse so quickly? J Dairy Sci 1996; 79 (8): 1487-95.
27. Wendelken G. Untersuchung des Thiamingehalts im Pansensaft bei niedrigen pH-Werten und wechselnder Thiaminzufuhr (in vitro). Diss med vet, Hannover 2000.
28. Wiedemeyer RD, Arambel MJ, Walters J. Effect of yeast culture and Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on ruminal charcteristics and nutrient digestibility. J Dairy Sci 1987; 70: 2063-8.
29. Williams AG, Coleman GS. The rumen protozoa. New York: Springer 1992; 1-371.
30. Yokoyama MT, Johnson AL. Microbiology of the rumen and intestine. In: The Ruminant Animal. Digestive Physiology and Nutrition. Church DC, ed. Reston, New Jersey 1988; 125-44.
31. 1 (Thiamin) in der Ernährung des Wiederkäuers. Übers Tierernährg 1973; 1: 273-323.