Application of the standard hough-transform to high resolution MRI of human trabecular bone to predict mechanical strength

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5032 I, Issue , 2003, Pages 470-480

  Boehm, Holger F ^a,b   Raeth, Christoph W ^a   Monetti, Roberto ^a   Mueller, Dirk ^a,b   Newitt, David ^c   Majumdar, Sharmila ^c   Rummeny, Ernst J ^a   Link, Thomas M ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR EXTRATERRESTRISCHE PHYSIK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

BMD; High Resolution MRI; Hough transform; In vitro; Maximum compressive strength; Structural analysis; Trabecular bone

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; HOUGH TRANSFORMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

TRABECULAR BONES;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 0042877035     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.481137     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Mc Broom R, Hayes W, Edwards W, et al. Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. J Bone and Joint Surgery 1985; 65A; 1206-1214.
2. Cortet B, Marchandise, Xavier. Bone microarchitecture and mechanical resistance. Joint Bone Spine 2001; 68; 297-305.
3. Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L, Danielson C. Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. Bone 1987; 8; 79-85.
4. Dalstra M, Huiskes A, Odgaard Ev. Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J Biomech 1993; 27; 375-389.
5. Vesterby A, Mosekilde L, Gundersen HJ, et al. Biologically meaningful determinants of the in vitro strength of lumbar vertebrae. Bone 1991; 12; 219-224.
6. Majumdar S, Newitt D, Jergas M, et al. Evaluation of technical factors affecting the quantification of trabecul ar bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging. Bone 1995; 17; 417-430.
7. Majumdar S, Genant H. A review of the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1995; 5; 79-92.
8. Gonzalez RC, Woods, R.E. Digital Image Processing. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley; 1992.
9. Jain AK. Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing. Eaglewodd Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1989.
10. Majumdar S, Genant HK, Grampp S, et al. Correlation of trabecular bone structure with age, bone mineral density, and osteoporotic status: in vivo studies in the distal radius using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12; 111-118.
11. Lin J, Amling M, Newitt D, et al. Heterogeneity of trabecular bone structure in the calcaneus using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Osteoporosis Int 1996; 8; 16-24.
12. Parfitt M, Drezner M, Glorieux F, et al. Bone Histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols and units. Report of the ASBMR histomorphometry nomenclature committee. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 2; 595-610.
13. Ballard D. Generalizing the hough transform to detect arbitary shapes. Pattern Recognition 1981; 13; 111-122.
14. Hill A. Principles of medical statistics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1971.
15. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Boston: Blackwell; 1994.
16. Lin J, Grampp S, Link T, et al. Fractal analysis of proximal femur radiographs: Correlation with biomechanical properties and bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 1999; 9; 516-524.
17. Link TM, Majumdar S, Konermann W, et al. Texture analysis of direct magnification radiographs of vertebral specimens: correlation with bone mineral density and biomechanical properties. Acad Radiol 1997; 4; 167-176.
18. Waldt S, Meier N, Renger B, et al. [The texture-analysis of high-resolution computed tomograms as an additional procedure in osteoporosis diagnosis: in-vitro studies on vertebral segments]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1999; 171; 136-142.
19. Haidekker MA, Andresen R, Werner HJ. Relationship between structural parameters, bone mineral density and fracture load in lumbar vertebrae, based on high-resolution computed tomography, quantitative computed tomography and compression tests. Osteoporos Int 1999; 9; 433-440.
20. Uchiyama T, Tanizawa T, Muramatsu H, et al. Three-dimensional microstructural analysis of human trabecular bone in relation to its mechanical properties. Bone 1999; 25; 487-491.
21. Link T, Majumdar S, Lin J, et al. A comparative study of trabecular bone properties in the spine and femur using high resolution MRI and CT. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13; 122-132.
22. Beuf O, Newitt DC, Mosekilde L, et al. Trabecular structure assessment in lumbar vertebrae specimens using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and relationship with mechanical competence. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16; 1511-1519.