The gene genie: Good fairy or wicked witch?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 723-739

  M McLean, Sheila A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Genetics; Procreative Choice; Reproduction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042870226     PISSN: 13698486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8486(01)00030-9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Annas G. Pregnant Women as Fetal Containers. Hastings Center Report. 16(6):1986;13-14.
2. Annas G. She's Going to Die: The Case of Angela C. Hastings Center Report. 18(1):1988;23-25.
3. Brenner, S. (1990) 'The Human Genome: The Nature of the Enterprise', in Human Genetic Information: Science, Law and Ethics, Ciba Foundation Symposium 149, (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons), pp. 6-12.
4. Our Genetic Future: The Science and Ethics of Genetic Technology. 1992;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Human Genetics: Choice and Responsibility. 1998;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Ethics and Mapping of the Human Genome. 1993;Danish Council of Ethics, Copenhagen.
7. Davies K., Williamson B. Gene Therapy Begins. British Medical Journal. 306:1993;1625-1626.
8. Dworkin, R. (1994) 'When is it Right to Die?' New York Times (May 5).
9. Fletcher, J. C. and Wertz, D. C. (1991) 'An International Code of Ethics in Medical Genetics Before the Human Genome is Mapped', in Z. Bankowski and A. Capron (eds), Genetics, Ethics and Human Values: Human Genome Mapping, Genetic Screening and Therapy, xxiv CIOMS Round Table Conference.
10. Freidmann T. Opinion: The Human Genome Project: Some Implications of Extensive "Reverse Genetic" Medicine. American Journal of Human Genetics. 46:1990;407-414.
11. Gregg R. "Choice" as a Double-Edged Sword: Information, Guilt and Mother-Blaming in a High-Tech Age. Women and Health. 20(3):1993;53-73.
12. ten Have H. Physician's Priorities - Patients' Expectations. Szawarski Z., Evans D. Solidarity, Justice and Health Care Priorities. 1993;42-52 Linkoping University, Linkoping, LCC.
13. Hubbard R., Wald E. Exploding the Gene Myth. 1993;Beacon Press, Boston.
14. Human Genome 1991-92 Program Report (1992) (Washington, DC: United States Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research Office of Environmental Research).
15. Johnsen D. The Creation of Fetal Rights: Conflicts with Women's Constitutional Rights to Liberty, Privacy and Equal Protection. Yale Law Journal. 95:1986;599-625.
16. Kevles D. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. 1985;Penguin, Harmondsworth.
17. Kolder V.et al. Court-ordered Obstetrical Interventions. New England Journal of Medicine. 316:1987;1192-1196.
18. Lew J.B. Terminally Ill and Pregnant: State Denial of a Woman's Right to Refuse a Caesarian Section. Buffalo Law Review. 38:1990;619-645.
19. McLean S.A.M. The Right to Reproduce. Campbell T., Goldberg D., McLean S., Mullen T. Human Rights: From Rhetoric to Reality. 1986;Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
20. McLean S.A.M. A Patient's Right to Know: Information Disclosure, the Doctor and the Law. 1989;Dartmouth, Aldershot.
21. McLean S.A.M. The New Genetics: A Challenge to Clinical Values. Proceedings of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 26:1996;41-50.
22. McLean S.A.M. Old Law, New Medicine. 1999;Rivers Oram/Pandora, London.
23. McLean S.A.M., Petersen K. Patient Status: The Foetus and the Pregnant Woman. Australian Journal of Human Rights. 2(2):1996;229-241.
24. Maddox J. New Genetics Means No New Ethics. Nature. 364(8 July):1993;97.
25. Mattingley S.S. The Maternal-Fetal Dyad: Exploring the Two-Patient Model. Hastings Center Report. 22(1):1992;13-18.
26. Meyers D. The Human Body and the Law. 1971;Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
27. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (1997) 'Cloning Human Beings' , Report and Recommendations, June 1997 (Rockville, MY: National Bioethics Advisory Commission).
28. Genetic Screening. 1993;Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London.
29. Robertson J., Shulman J. Pregnancy and Prenatal Harm to Offspring: The Case of Mothers with PKU. Hastings Center Report. 17(4):1987;23-33.
30. Ethical Issues in Clinical Genetics. 1991;Royal College of Physicians of London, London.
31. Ruddick W., Wilcox W. Operating on the Fetus. Hastings Center Report. 12:1982;10-14.
32. Schmidtke J. Who Owns the Human Genome? Ethical and Legal Aspects. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 44(Suppl. 1):1992;205-210.
33. Stone D., Stewart S. Towards a Screening Strategy for Scotland. 1994;Scottish Forum for Public Health Medicine, Glasgow.
34. Swartz M. Pregnant Women vs Fetus: A Dilemma for Hospital Ethics Committees. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1:1992;51-62.
35. Whittaker L.A. The Implications of the Human Genome Project for Family Practice. Journal of Family Practice. 35(3):1992;294-301.
36. Wilkie T. Perilous Knowledge: The Human Genome Project and Its Implications. 1993;Faber and Faber, London.