Seismic force modification factors for the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 308-327

  Mitchell, Denis ^a   Tremblay, Robert ^b   Karacabeyli, Erol ^c   Paultre, Patrick ^d   Saatcioglu, Murat ^e   Anderson, Donald L ^f  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c FORINTEK CANADA CORP   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Buildings; Ductility; Earthquakes; Force modification factors; Overstrength; Seismic

Indexed keywords

BUILDING CODES; SEISMOLOGY; STANDARDS;

SEISMIC FORCE;

CIVIL ENGINEERING;

BUILDING CODE; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SEISMIC DESIGN; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

CANADA;

EID: 0042855820     PISSN: 03151468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/l02-111     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ACI. 1983. Building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI318-83). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich.
2. Adams, J., and Atkinson, G. 2003. Development of seismic hazard maps for the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30: 255-271.
3. ATC. 1995a. Structural response modification factors. ATC-19, Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, Calif.
4. ATC. 1995b. A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design. ATC-34, Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, Calif.
5. ATC. 1997. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA-273). ATC-33, Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, Calif.
6. Bruneau, M., Uang, C.-M., and Whittaker, A. 1998. Ductile design of steel structures. McGraw-Hill, New York.
7. Ceccotti, A., and Karacabeyli, E. 2002. Validation of seismic design parameters for wood-frame shearwall systems. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29: 484-498.
8. CSA. 1984. Design of concrete structures for buildings. Standard CAN3-A23.3-M84, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont.
9. CSA. 1994a. Design of concrete structures. Standard CSA-A23.3-94, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont.
10. CSA. 1994b. Masonry design for buildings (limit states design). Standard CSA-S304.1-94, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont.
11. CSA. 2001a. Limit states design of steel structures. Standard CSA-S16-01, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont.
12. CSA. 2001b. Engineering design in wood. Standard CSA-O86-01, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont.
13. CWC. 2001. Wood design manual 2001. Canadian Wood Council (CWC), Ottawa, Ont.
14. ECS. 1998. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. May 2001 Draft, European Committee for Standardization (ECS), Brussels, Belgium.
15. Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M. 1990. On the response modification factor for reinforced concrete buildings. In Proceedings of the 4th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 20-24 May 1990, Palm Springs, Calif. Vol. 2, pp. 249-258.
16. Glanville, J.I., Hatzinikolas, M.A., and Ben-Omran, H.A. 1996. Engineered masonry design: limit states design. Winston House Enterprises, Winnipeg, Man.
17. Heidebrecht, A.C. 2003. Overview of seismic provisions of the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30: 241-254.
18. Heidebrecht, A.C., and Tso, W.K. 1985. Seismic loading provisions changes in the National Building Code of Canada. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 12: 653-660.
19. Humar, J., and Mahgoub, M.A. 2003. Determination of seismic design forces by equivalent static load method. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30: 287-307.
20. Instituto de Ingeniería. 1987. Normas tecnicas complementarias para diseño por sismo. Departamento del Distrito Federal (Code for seismic design in the Federal District). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.
21. Karacabeyli, E., and Ni, C. 2001. Shearwalls and diaphragms: commentary of CSA Standard O86.1. Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont.
22. Koboevic, S., and Redwood, R.G. 1997. Design and seismic response of shear critical eccentrically braced frames. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23: 761-771.
23. Kulak, G.L., Kennedy, D.J.L., Driver, R.G., and Medhekar, M. 2001. Steel plate shear walls: an overview. Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, 38(1): 50-62.
24. Mirza, S.A., and MacGregor, J.G. 1979. Variability of mechanical properties of reinforcing bars. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, 105(ST5): 921-937.
25. Mitchell, D., and Paultre, P. 1994. Ductility and overstrength in seismic design of reinforced concrete structures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21: 1049-1060.
26. Mitchell, D., Paultre, P., and Collins, M.P. 1995. Seismic design. In Concrete design handbook. 2nd ed. Canadian Portland Cement Association, Ottawa, Ont. Chapt. 11, pp. 11.1-11.33.
27. Nassar, A., and Krawinkler, H. 1991. Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems. Report 95, John Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
28. NBCC. 1980. National Building Code of Canada 1980. National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
29. NBCC. 1995. National Building Code of Canada. Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
30. NEHRP. 1997. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Part 2: commentary. FEMA-303. National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program, Building Seismic Safety Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
31. Ni, C., and Karacabeyli, E. 2000. Effect of overturning restraint on performance of shearwalls. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering, Whistler, B.C., 31 July - 3 August. Department of Wood Science, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. CD-Rom Paper No. 2.3.1: 1-9.
32. NZS. 1982. New Zealand standard code of practice for the design of concrete structures. NZS 3101: Part 1, Standard Association of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
33. Osteraas, G.D., and Krawinkler, H. 1990. Strength and ductility considerations in seismic design. Report 90, John Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
34. Park, R., and Paulay, T. 1975. Reinforced concrete structures. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
35. Paulay, T., and Priestley, M.J.N. 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
36. Paultre, P., Castele, D., Rattray, S., and Mitchell, D. 1989. Seismic response of reinforced concrete frame sub assemblages - a Canadian code perspective. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 16: 627-649.
37. Popovski, M., Prion, H.G.L., and Karacabeyli, E. 1999. Braced timber frames as a load resistant system. In Proceedings of the Pacific Timber Engineering Conference, Rotorua, New Zealand, 15-20 March. New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited, Rotorua, New Zealand. Vol. 3, pp. 391-398.
38. Popovski, M., Prion, H.G.L., and Karacabeyli, E. 2002. Seismic performance of connections in heavy timber construction. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29: 389-399.
39. Rahgozar, M.A., and Humar, J.L. 1998. Accounting for overstrength in seismic design of steel structures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25: 1-15.
40. Rainer, J.H., and Karacabeyli, E. 2000. Performance of wood-frame construction in earthquakes. In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 30 January - 4 February. Society for Earthquake Engineering, Silverstream, New Zealand. CD-Rom Paper No. 2454: 1-8.
41. SAC. 2000. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. FEMA Report 350, SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
42. Schmidt, B.J., and Bartlett, F.M. 2002. Review of resistance factor for steel: data collection. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29: 98-108.
43. Tremblay, R. 2001. Seismic behaviour and design of concentrically braced steel frames. Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, 38(3): 148-166.
44. Tremblay, R., Timler, P., Bruneau, M., and Filiatrault, A. 1995. Performance of steel structures during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22: 338-360.
45. Tremblay, R., Bruneau, M., Nakashima, M., Prion, H.G.L., Filiatrault, A., and DeVall, R. 1996. Seismic design of steel buildings: lessons from the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23: 727-756.
46. Tso, W.K. 1992. Overview of seismic provision changes in National Building Code of Canada. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 19: 383-388.