Thirty minutes mobile phone use has no short-term adverse effects on central auditory pathways

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 114, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1390-1394

  Arai, Noritoshi ^a   Enomoto, Hiroyuki ^a   Okabe, Shingo ^a   Yuasa, Kaoru ^a   Kamimura, Yoshitsugu ^b   Ugawa, Yoshikazu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UTSUNOMIYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem response; Auditory system; Electromagnetic field; Middle latency response; Mobile phone

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN STEM; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NERVE TRACT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION SICKNESS; TELEPHONE;

EID: 0042847373     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00124-X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Borbely A.A., Huber R., Graf T., Fuchs B., Gallmann E., Achermann P. Pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic field affects human sleep and sleep electroencephalogram. Neurosci Lett. 175:1999;207-210.
2. Brierley J.B., Graham D.I. Hypoxia and vascular disorders of the central nervous system. Adams J.H., Corsellis J.A.N., Duchen L.W. Greenfield's neuropathology. 1984;125-207 Edward Arnold, London.
3. Burkard R., Deegan D. Brainstem evoked responses to paired click stimuli: the use of digital response subtraction. Audiology. 23:1984;85-98.
4. Croft R.J., Chandler J.S., Burgess A.P., Barry R.J., Williams J.D., Clarke A.R. Acute mobile phone operation affects neural function in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 113:2002;1623-1632.
5. Davis-Gunter M.J., Lowenheim H., Gopal K.V., Moore E.J. The I' potential of the human auditory brainstem response to paired click stimuli. Scand Audiol. 30:2001;50-60.
6. Davis H., Wallace W.M. Factors affecting changes produced in electroencephalogram by standardized hyperventilation. Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 47:1942;606-625.
7. Eulitz C., Ullsperger P., Gabriele F., Elbert T. Mobile phones modulate response patterns of human brain activity. NeuroReport. 9:1998;3229-3232.
8. Freude G., Ullsperger P., Eggert S., Ruppe I. Effects of microwaves emitted by cellular phones on human slow brain potentials. Bioelectromagnetics. 19:1998;384-387.
9. Gibbs F.A., Gibbs E.L. Atlas of electroencephalography. vol. 1:1950;Addison-Wesley, Cambridge.
10. Hess C.W., Ludin H.P. Auditory brain-stem potentials studied with paired stimuli in normals. J Neurol. 234:1987;298-302.
11. Hietanen M., Hamalainen A.M., Husman T. Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones. Bioelectromagnetics. 23:2002;264-270.
12. Huber R., Graf T., Cote K.A., Wittmann L., Gallmann E., Matter D., Schuderer J., Kuster N., Borbely A.A., Achermann P. Exposure to pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic field during waking affects human sleep EEG. NeuroReport. 11:2000;3321-3325.
13. Kellényi L., Thuroczy G., Faludy B., Lenard L. Effects on mobile GSM radiotelephone exposure on the auditory brainstem response (ABR). Neurobiology. 7:1999;79-81.
14. Kemp D.T. Development in cochlear mechanics and techniques for noninvasive evaluation. Adv Audiol. 5:1988;27-45.
15. Kevanishvili Z., Lagidze Z. Recovery function of the human brainstem auditory-evoked potential. Audiology. 18:1979;472-484.
16. Koivisto M., Revonusuo A., Krause C., Haarala C., Sillanmaki L., Laine M., Hamalainen H. Effects of 902 MHz electromagnetic field emitted by cellular telephones on response times in humans. NeuroReport. 11:1999;413-415.
17. Lorist M.M., Snel J., Mulder G., Kok A. Aging, caffeine, and information processing: an event-related potential analysis. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 96:1995;453-467.
18. Minckler J. Pathology of the nervous system. 1968;McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
19. Ozturan O., Erdem T., Miman M.C., Kalcioglu M.T., Oncel S. Effects of the electromagnetic field of mobile telephones on hearing. Acta Otolaryngol. 122:2002;289-293.
20. Picton T.W., Hillyard S.A. Human auditory evoked potentials. II Effects of attention. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 36:1974;191-200.
21. Picton T.W., Hillyard S.A., Krausz H.I., Galambos R. Human auditory evoked potentials I: evaluation of components. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 36:1974;179-190.
22. Popov V.V., Supin A.Y. Auditory brain stem responses in characterization of dolphin hearing. J Comp Physiol [A]. 166:1990;385-393.
23. Preece A.W., Iwi G., Davies-Smith A., Wesnes S., Butler S., Lim E., Varey A. Effects of a 915-MHz simulated mobile phone signal on cognitive function in man. Int J Radiat Biol. 75:1999;447-456.
24. Reiser H.P., Dimpfel W., Schober F. The influence of electromagnetic field on human brain activity. Eur J Med Res. 1:1995;27-32.
25. Sandstrom M., Wielen J., Oftedal G., Mild H. Mobile phone use and subjective symptoms. Comparison of symptoms experienced by users of analogue and digital mobile phones. Occup Med. 51:2001;25-35.
26. Waring M.D. Refractory properties of auditory brain-stem responses evoked by electrical stimulation of human cochlear nucleus: evidence of neural generators. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 108:1998;331-344.