Navigating conflict of interest in oocyte donation

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2001, Pages W1-W2

  Kalfoglou, Andrea L ^a  

^a NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE; COMMODIFICATION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONSUMER; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; FEMALE; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LIVING DONOR; NOTE; OOCYTE DONATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; COERCION; COMMODIFICATION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DISCLOSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LIVING DONORS; OOCYTE DONATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK;

EID: 0042844733     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651601317139333     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2000. Financial incentives in recruitment of oocyte donors. Fertility and Sterility 74:216-220.
2. Gurmankin, A. D. 2001. Risk information provided to prospective oocyte donors in a preliminary phone call. American Journal of Bioethics 1(4): 3-13.
3. Kalfoglou, A. L., and G. Geller. 2000a. Navigating conflict of interest in oocyte donation: An analysis of oocyte donors’ experiences. Women’s Health Issues 10:226-239.
4. Kalfoglou, A. L., and G. Geller. 2000b. What do oocyte donors want to know about the distribution of their oocytes? Fertility and Sterility 74:660-667.
5. Kalfoglou, A. L., and J. Gittelsohn. 2000. A qualitative follow-up study of women’s experiences with oocyte donation. Human Reproduction 15:798-805.