Validation of the complexity and treatment outcome components of the index of complexity, outcome, and need (ICON)

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 244-248

  Savastano Jr , Nicholas J ^a   Firestone, Allen R ^a,b   Beck, F Michael ^a   Vig, Katherine W L ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Section of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; EVALUATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS; POPULATION MODEL; RANDOMIZATION; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0042838096     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00399-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Daniels C., Richmond S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). Br J Orthod. 27:2000;149-162.
2. Holmes A., Willmot D. The Consultant Orthodontists Group 1994 survey of the use of the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN). Br J Orthod. 23:1996;57-59.
3. Espeland L.V., Ivarsson K., Stenvik A. A new Norwegian index of orthodontic treatment need related to orthodontic concern among 11-year-olds and their parents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 20:1992;274-279.
4. Richmond S., Daniels C.P., Fox N., Wright J. The professional perception of orthodontic treatment complexity. Br Dent J. 183:1997;365-370.
5. Bergström K., Halling A. Comparison of three indices in evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome. Acta Odontol Scand. 55:1997;36-43.
6. Cassinelli A.G., Firestone A.R., Beck F.M., Vig K.W. Factors associated with orthodontists' assessment of difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 123:2003;497-502.
7. Richmond S., Daniels C.P. International comparisons of professional assessments in orthodontics part 1 - treatment need . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 113:1998;180-185.
8. Richmond S., Daniels C.P. International comparisons of professional assessments in orthodontics part 2 - treatment outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 113:1998;324-328.
9. Brook F.H., Shaw W.C. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod. 11:1989;309-320.
10. Firestone A.R., Beck F.M., Beglin F.M., Vig K.W.L. Validity of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON) in determining orthodontic treatment need. Angle Orthod. 75:2002;15-20.
11. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., O'Brien K.D., Buchanan I.B., Jones R., Stephens C.D., et al. The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating) reliability and validity . Eur J Orthod. 14:1992;125-139.
12. Cohen A.J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 20:1960;37-46.
13. Landis J.R., Koch C.G. The measurement of observer agreement for catagorical data. Biometrics. 33:1977;159-174.
14. Gjorup T. The kappa coefficient and the prevalence of a diagnosis. Methods Inf Med. 27:1988;184-186.
15. Daniels CP. An evaluation of international professional perceptions in orthodontics. Cardiff: Department of Dental Health and Development, University of Wales; 1998. p. 279.
16. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., Roberts C.T., Andrews M. The PAR index (peer assessment rating) methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards . Eur J Orthod. 14:1992;180-187.