MycroMesh is not a suitable soft tissue prosthesis for repair of the defective vaginal wall

Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 424-425

  Vancaillie, Thierry G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; TREATMENT FAILURE; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 0042836878     PISSN: 10743804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60279-4     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, et al: Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1357-1364, 2001
2. Sullivan ES, Longaker CJ, Lee PY: Total pelvic mesh repair: A ten year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 44:857-863, 2001
3. Dietz HP, Vancaillie P, Svehla M, et al: Mechanical properties of implant material used in incontinence surgery. Presented at the 31st annual meeting of the International Continence Society, Seoul, Korea, September 18-21, 2001