Whatever Happened to the Next-Generation Internet?

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2001, Pages 61-68

  Weiser, Mark ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042834002     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/383694.383708     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Barney, D. and Marsan C. Internet pioneer: IPv6 transition needed. Network World (Oct. 25, 1999).
2. Borella, M., Grabelsky, D., Lo, J., and Tuniguchi, K. Realm-Specific IP: Protocol Specification. Internet Draft (July 2000); see draft-ietf-nat-rsip-protocol-07.txt.
3. Carpenter, B. and Jung, C. Transmission of IPv6 Over IPv4 Domains Without Explicit Tunnels. RFC 2529, Mar. 1999.
4. Carpenter, B. and Moore, K. Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds Without Explicit Tunnels. Internet Draft, Oct. 1999; see draft-ietf-ngtrans-6to4-03.txt.
5. Christensen, C. Innovation and the General Manager. Irwin McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999.
6. Deering, S. and Hinden, R. Internet Protocol, Version 6 Specification. RFC 1883, Dec. 1995.
7. Marsan, C. The next best thing to IPv6? Network World (Sept. 20, 1999).
8. Postel, J. Internet Protocol: DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification. RFC 791, Sept. 1981.
9. Sahal, D. Patterns of Technological Innovation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1981.
10. Solensky, F. Minutes of the Address Lifetime Expectations Working Group, July 1994; see ftp://ftp.ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-online-proceedings/94jul/area.and.wg. reports/ipng/ale/ale-minutes-94jul.txt.
11. Srisuresh, P. and Egavang, K. Traditional IP Network Address Translator. RFC 3022, Jan. 2001.