Evaluating research performance: The strategy of the university of naples federico ii (Italy)

Higher Education Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 75-90

  Carotenutoa, Gianfranco ^a   Lapegnab, Mariagloria ^a   Zolloc, Giuseppe ^a   Donatod, Alberto Di ^a   Nicolaisa, Luigi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Journal Citation Report; Scientific activity; University of Naples Federico II

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042821684     PISSN: 09528733     EISSN: 17403863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8733(00)00022-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ball, C., and Halwachi, J. (1987). Performance indicators in higher education. Higher Education, pp. 4-16.
2. Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education: total quality care. London: SRHE/Open University Press.
3. Bauer, M. (1993). Performance-based funding and institutional quality assurance and development. Paper presented at the 15th EAIR Forum, Turku, Finland. Utrecht: VSNU.
4. Beasley, J. E. (1990). Comparing university departments. Omega, (18) 171-83.
5. Berendsen, G. D. J. (1993). Quality assessment of research in The Netherlands, paper presented at the 15th EAIR Forum, Turku, Finland. Utrecht: VSNU.
6. Biggeri, L., and Scarpitti, L. (1998). Evaluation in the Italian university system. Paper presented at International Conference on Evaluation: Profession, Business or Politics? Rome, October 29-31.
7. Bignami, G. (1992). Academic standards in Italy. Nature 358, 364.
8. Burr, D. (1992). Italian university structure, Nature 357, 273.
9. Cave, M., Dodsworth R., and Thompson, D. (1995). Regulatory Reform in Higher Education in the UK: Incentives for efficiency and product quality. In: M. Bishop, J. Kay and C. Hayer (Eds.). The regulatory challenge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. CHEPS. (1996). In: B. Jongbloed and J. Koelman (Eds.). Funding mechanisms for higher education: a five-country based survey with special reference to performance based funding approaches.
11. CRE. (1995a). Guidelines for self-evaluation and preparation for audit team visits. A cura di Frans van Vught e Don Westerheijden. Geneve: CHEPS.
12. CRE. (1995b). Institutional evaluation and management for quality. The CRE institutional quality evaluation programme: background, goals and procedures. Geneve: CRE.
13. CRE. (1996). Institutional evaluation programme. guidelines for self-evaluation and preparation for review team visits. Geneve: CHEPS.
14. CRE. (1997). Institutional evaluation as a tool for change Levaluation institutionnelle, outil de changement. Geneve: CRE.
15. CRE. (1998). Principles and practice of strategic management in university. Volume 1, a cura di Pierre Tabatoni and Andris Barblan. Geneve: CRE.
16. CRUI. (1997). Valutazione delle attivita didattiche universitarie, L. Modica and E. Stefani (Eds.), Le esperienze condotte dalla CRUI. Rome: CRUI.
17. CRUI. - Universita’ca’foscari di Venezia. (1998). Atti del convegno. Strategie ed esperienze innovative di valutazione nelle universita italiane. In: E. Stefani and M. Cavallini (Eds.). Venezia, 9 dicembre 1996. Roma: CRUI.
18. De Marchi, M., Poti’, B., Reale, E., Rocchi, M., and Scarda, A. M. (1998). Il sistema scientifico pubblico in Italia. Cambiamenti e tendenze. Milano: Franco Angeli, Istituto di studi sulla ricerca e documentazione scientifica CNR.
19. EFMD (European Foundation for Management Development). (1997). The dynamic model for quality development. Guidance notes on the equis quality criteria. EFMD.
20. Gaetani, G. F., and Ferraris, A. M. (1991). Academic promotion in Italy. Nature, 353, 10.
21. Garbisa, S., and Calza, L. (1995). Il peso della qualita accademica Cleup.
22. Harvey, L., and Green, D. (1988). Defining quality. In: Assessment and evaluation in higher education, 1993, 1, 9-34. n. 42, pp. 54-71.
23. Kells, H. R. (1990). The inadequacy of performance indicators for higher education: the need for a more comprehensive and development construct. Higher Education Management, n. (3), p. 258-270.
24. Kells, H. R. (1992). Self regulation in higher education. A multi-national perspective on collaborative systems of quality assurance control. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher.
25. Nova Scotia Council on Higher Education, (1997). Discussion paper on the development of a new funding formula for Nova Scotia’s universities. Halifax: Nova Scotia Council on Higher Education.
26. OECD (1994). Evaluation and the decision making process in higher education: French, German and Spanish Experiences. Paris Cedex: OECD.
27. OECD (1995). Performance standards in education. In search of quality. Paris Cedex: OECD.
28. Persico, F. (1992). Academic standards in Italy. Nature, 358, 364.
29. Politecnico di torino, CPD. (1996). In: M. Gola (Ed.). The trend and the methods of quality assessment at the Politecnico of Torino. Torino: Politecnico di Torino.
30. Richter, R. (1994). Improving teaching quality in German higher education. Higher Education Management, 2.
31. Roberts, L. (1991). The rush to publish. Science, 251, 260-263.
32. Romagnoli, M. (1994). L’importanza di essere citati. Le Scienze, 312, 08.
33. Strata, P. (1995). Citation analysis. Nature, 375, 624.
34. Taubes, G. (1993). Measures for measure in science. Science, 260, 884-886.
35. Universita’ ca’ Foscari di Venezia. (1996). Strategie ed esperienze di valutazione nelle Universita italiane. Seminario di studio. La valutazione CRE dell'Universita Ca' Foscari. Venezia, 9 dicembre 1996. Venezia: Unita Studi, Programmazione e Progetti Speciali.
36. Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi. (1998). Relazione annuale sull'attivita di ricerca. Milano: Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, 1997.
37. Zucco, F. (1994). Valutazioni a peso. Sistema Ricerca, 35, 33-35.