Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prostheses for tumors

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 414, Issue , 2003, Pages 197-211

  Langlais, Frantz ^a   Lambotte, J C ^b   Collin, P ^b   Thomazeau, H ^b  

^a Hopital Universitaire Sud   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALLOGRAFT; ARTICLE; BONE CANCER; BONE GRAFT; BONE STRENGTH; CANCER SURVIVAL; CAUSE OF DEATH; CHONDROSARCOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; GLUTEUS MAXIMUS MUSCLE; HIP DISEASE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0042819867     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000079270.91782.23     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anract PH, Coste J, Vastel L, et al: Prothèse massive et prothése manchonnée d'une allogreffe pour la reconstruction de l'extrémité supérieure du fémur: Etude comparative des résultats fonctionnels, de la survie et des complications de 41 cas. Rev Chir Orthop 86:278-288, 2000.
2. Dobbs H, Scales J, Wilson J, et al: Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur and acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg 63B:219-223, 1981.
3. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ: A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop 286:241-246, 1993.
4. Gitelis S, Piasecki P: Allograft prosthetic composite arthroplasty for osteosarcoma and other aggressive bone tumors. Clin Orthop 270:197-201, 1991.
5. Giurea A, Paternostro M, Heinz-Peer G, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F: Function of reinserted abductor muscles after femoral replacement. J Bone Joint S urg 69A:410-425, 1987.
6. Horowitz S, Glasser DB, Lane JM, Healey JH: Prosthetic and extremity survivorship after limb salvage for sarcoma. Clin Orthop 293:280-286, 1993,
7. International Society of Limb Salvage Evaluation Committee, Glasser D, Langlais F: The ISOLS Radiological Implants Evaluation System: In Langlais F, Tomeno B (eds). Limb Salvage. Paris, Springer Verlag 23-31, 1991.
8. Jofe MH, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ: Reconstruction for defects of the proximal part of the femur using allograft arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 70A:507-516, 1988.
9. Khong KS, Chao EY, Sim FH: Long-term Performance of Custom Prosthetic Replacement for Neoplastic Disease of Proximal Femur. In Yamamuro T (ed). New Developments for Limb Salvage in Musculoskeletal Oncology. Tokyo, Springer-Verlag 403-411, 1989.
10. Langlais F: Resection and Reconstruction in Proximal Femoral Malignancies. Surgical Techniques in Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT). Paris, Elsevier 55-480-C-10. 1-8, 2000.
11. Langlais F, Aubriot JH, Postel M, Tomeno B, Vielpeau C: Prothèse de reconstruction de hanches pour tumeur. Rev Chir Orthop 72:415-425, 1986.
12. Langlais F, Cormier M, Bunetel L, Blanquaert D: Prevention of Infection by Antibiotic-Loaded Cement. In Brown K (ed). Complications of Limb Salvage. Montreal, International Society of Limb Salvage 601-603, 1991.
13. Langlais F, Delepine G, Dubousset JF, Missenard G: Composite Prostheses in Malignant Tumors: Rationale and Preliminary Results of 42 Cases. In Langlais F, Tomeno B (eds). Limb Salvage. Paris, Springer Verlag 387-394, 1991.
14. Langlais F, Howell JR, Lee AJC, Ling RSM: The "French Paradox. " Hip Intern 12:166-167, 2002
15. Langlais F, Lambotte JC, Thomazeau H: Long-term results of hemipelvis reconstruction with allografts. Clin Orthop 388:178-186, 2000.
16. Markel MD, Wood SA, Bogdanske JJ, et al: Comparison of allograft/endoprosthetic composites with a step-cut or transverse osteotomy configuration. J Orthop Res 13:639-641, 1995.
17. Merle d'Aubigné R, Postel M: Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 36A:451-475, 1954.
18. Mc Goveran B, Davis A, Gross A, Bell R: Evaluation of the allograft composite technique for femoral reconstruction after resection of a primary bone tumor. Can J Surg 42:37-45, 1999.
19. Pluhar G, Bogdanske J, Manley P, Heiner J, Markel M: Three Methods of Tendon Attachment to an Allograft Composite Prosthesis of the Proximal Femur (In Vivo Canine Model). In Healey J (ed). Limb Salvage. New York, International Society of Limb Salvage 112, 1997.
20. Unwin PS, Cannon SR, Grimer RJ, et al: Aseptic loosening in cemented custom-made prosthetic replacements for bone tumors of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg 78B:5-13, 1996.
21. Zehr R, Enneking W, Scarborough M: Allograft prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction Clin Orthop 322:207-223, 1996.