Governance by diffusion? Potentials and restrictions of environmental policy diffusion

PIK Report

Volumn , Issue 80, 2003, Pages 168-182

  Tews, Kerstin ^a   Busch, Per Olof ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GLOBAL CHANGE; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0042784855     PISSN: 14360179     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Andersen, M.S. and Liefferink, D. eds. 1997. European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers. Manchester and New York.
2. Barde, J.-P. 1999. Environmental Taxes in OECD Countries: An Overview, in: OECD 1999, Environmental Taxes. Recent Developments in China and OECD Countries (pp. 19-50). Paris.
3. Bennett, C.J. 1991. What is Policy Convergence and What Causes it? British Journal of Political Science 21: 215-233.
4. Bennett, C.J. 1997. Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability, Governance 10(3): 213-233.
5. Berry, F.S. and Berry, W. 1999. Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research, in P.A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 169-200). Boulder/Oxford.
6. Botcheva, L. and Martin L. L. 2001. Institutional effects on state behavior: Convergence and Divergence. International Studies Quarterly 45: 1-26.
7. Burke, Brendan. 1999. Diffusion of Regulatory and Distributive Innovations Across the American State: Different paths? Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, September.
8. CSE (Center for a Sustainable Economy). 2001. Tax News Update. www.sustainableeconomy.org/tnu/.
9. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W.W. 1991. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, in P. DiMaggio and W.W. Powell (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 63-82). Chicago.
10. Dolowitz, D.P. and Marsh, D. 1996. Who Learns What From Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature, Political Studies 44: 343-357.
11. Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. 2000. Learning form Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy Making, Governance 13(1): 5-24.
12. EEA. 1996. Environmental Taxes. Implementation and Environmental Effectiveness. Environmental Issues Series No.1. Copenhagen.
13. EEA. 1997. Environmental Agreements. Copenhagen.
14. EEA. 2000. Environmental Taxes: recent developments in tools for integration. Environmental Issue Series No. 18. Copenhagen.
15. Ekins. P. 1996. Environmental Taxes and Charges. National Experiences and Plans. Report of the European Workshop held at the Foundation, Dublin, on 7-8 February, Dublin.
16. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Environmental Labeling. Issues. Policies and Practices Worldwide. Washington: EPA.
17. --(2): 361-385.
18. Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change, International Organization 52(4): 887-917.
19. FOE (Friends of the Earth Europe). 1995. A Practical Guide on Improving Public Access to Environmental Information. New Items for Central and Eastern Europe 8, Friends of the Earth Europe.
20. Friedkin, N. 1984. Structural Cohesion and Equivalence Explanations of Social Homogeneity, Sociological Methodological Research 12: 235-261.
21. Gray, V. 1973. Innovations in the State: A Diffusion Study, American Political Science Review 67: 1174-1185.
22. Gray, V. 1994, Competition, Emulation and Policy Innovation, in L.C. Dodd, and C. Jillson (eds.), New Perspectives on American Politics (pp. 230-248). Washington.
23. Haas, P. 1992. Introduction, Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination, International Organization 46(1): 1-35.
24. Heritier, A., Knill, C. and Mingers, S. 1996. Ringing the Changes in Europe. Regulatory Competition and the Transformation of the State. Berlin.
25. Hoberg, G. 2001. Globalization and Policy Convergence: Symposium Overview, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 3: 127-132.
26. Hoerner, A. J. and F. Muller. 1996. Carbon Taxes for Climate Protection in a Competitive World. A Paper prepared for the Swiss Federal Office for Foreign Economic Affairs by the Environmental Tax Program of the Center for Global Change University of Maryland College Park.
27. Jänicke, M. 2000. Ecological Modernization: Innovation and Diffusion of Policy and Technology. Berlin: FFU-report 00-08.
28. Jänicke, M., Carius, A. and H. Jörgens unter Mitarbeit von C. Kolt. 1997. Nationale Umweltpläne in ausgewählten Industrieländern. Berlin.
29. Jänicke, M. and Jörgens, H. 1998. National Environmental Policy Planning in OECD Countries: Preliminary Lessons from Cross National Comparisons, Environmental Politics 7: 27-54.
30. Jänicke, M. and Jörgens, H. 2000. Strategic Environmental Planning and Uncertainty: A Cross-National Comparison of Green Plans in Industrialised Countries, Policy Studies Journal 28(3): 612-632.
31. Jänicke, M. Jörgens, H. and Koll, C. 2000. Elemente einer deutschen Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie-Einige Schlussfolgerungen aus dem internationalen Vergleich, in M. Jänicke and H. Jörgens (eds.), Umweltplanung im internationalen Vergleich. Strategien der Nachhaltigkeit (pp. 221-230). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
32. Jänicke, M. and Weidner, H. eds. 1997a. National Environmental Policies: A Comparative Study of Capacity-Building. Berlin.
33. Jänicke, M. and Weidner, H. 1997b. Zum aktuellen Stand der Umweltpolitik im internationalen Vergleich-Tendenzen zu einer globalen Konvergenz, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B27/97: 15-24.
34. Jörgens, H. 1996. Die Institutionalisierung von Umweltpolitik im internationalen Vergleich, in M. Jänicke(ed.), Umweltpolitik der industrieländer. Entwicklung-Bilanz-Erfolgsbedingungen (pp. 59-111). Berlin.
35. Jörgens, H. 2001. The Diffusion of Environmental Policy Innovations-Findings From an International Workshop, Environmental Politics 10(2): 122-127.
36. Jordan, A. 2001. 'New' Environmental Policy Instruments in the UK: Policy Innovation or 'Muddling Through? Paper prepared for the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Grenoble, April 2001.
37. Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., Zito, A. and Brückner, L. 2000. The Innovation of "New" Environmental Policy Instruments (NEPIs): Patterns and Pathways of Convergence and Divergence in the European Union? Paper prepared for the International Workshop on "Diffusion of Environmental Policy Innovations" in Berlin in December 8-9, 2000.
38. 2 taxes in Norway, Cicero Policy Note 5, Oslo.
39. Katzenstein, P.J., Keohane, R.O. and Krasner, S. D. 1998. International Organization and the Study of World Politics, International Organization 32(4): 634-685.
40. Keohane, R.O. 1988. International Institutions. Two Approaches, International Studies Quarterly 32(4): 379-396.
41. Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists beyond Borders. Ithaca.
42. Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. 1999. Trans-national advocacy net works in international and regional politics, International Social Science Journal 159: 89-101.
43. Kern, K. 1998. Horizontale und Vertikale Politikdiffusion in Mehrebeneosystemen. Berlin: FFU-report 98-6.
44. Kern, K. 2000. Die Diffusion von Politikinnovationen. Umweltpolitische Innovationen im Mehrebenensystem der USA. Opladen.
45. Kern, K., Jörgens: H. and Jänicke, M. 2000. Die Diffusion umweltpolitischer Innovationen. Ein Beitrag zur Globalisierung von Umweltpolitik, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik and Umweltrecht 4: 507-546.
46. Kern, K., Jörgens, H. and Jänicke, M. 2001. The Diffusion of Environmental Policy Innovations: A Contribution to the Globalisation of Environmental Policy, Discussion Paper FS 11 01-302, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin Für Sozialforschung.
47. Kern, K., Kissling-Näf, I., Landmann, U. and C. Mauch in collaboration with T. Löffelsend, 2001. Policy Convergence and Policy Diffusion by Governmental and Non-Governmental Institutions-An International Comparison of Eco-labeling Systems. Discussion Paper FS 11 01-305, Social Science Research Center Berlin.
48. Kloepfer, M. and Mast, E. 1995. Das Umweltrecht des Auslands. Berlin.
49. Knill, C. and Lenschow, A. 1998. Change as "Appropriate Adaptation" Administrative Adjustment to European Environmental Policy in Britain and Germany, European Integration Online Papers (EioP) 2(1): http://eiop.at/eiop/texte/1998-001.htm.
50. Knill, C. and Lenschow, A. eds. 2000. Implementing EU environmental policy. New directions and old problems. Manchester and New York.
51. Landmann, U. 1998. Nationale Umweltzeichen im Zuge der Globalisierung von Wirtschafts-, Umwelt- und Sozialpolitik. Analyse und Perspektiven von Umweltzeichenprogrammen. digitale Dissertation. Berlin: www.diss.fu-berlin.de/1999/22/index.html.
52. Lutz, J. 1987. Regional Leadership Patterns in the Diffusion of Public Policies, American Politics Quarterly 15: 387-398.
53. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. New York.
54. Marcussen, M. 2001. The OECD in Search of a Role: Playing the Idea Game. Paper prepared for the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Grenoble, April 2001.
55. Martin, L. L. and Simmons, B. A. 1998. Theories and empirical studies of international institutions, International Organization 52(4): 729-757.
56. Meyer, J.W., Frank, D.J., Hironaka, A., Schofer, E. and Tuma, N.B. 1997. The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870-1990. International Organization 51(4): 623-651.
57. Mohr, L. 1969. Determinants of Innovation in Organizations, American Political Science Review 75: 963-974.
58. OECD. 1993. A Comparison of Carbon Taxes in Selected OECD Countries. OECD Environment Monographs, No. 78. OECD/GD(93) 120. Paris.
59. OECD. 1995a. Environmental Taxes in OECD Countries. Paris.
60. OECD. 1995b. Environmental Performance Review. Poland. Paris.
61. OECD. 1997. Eco-Labeling: Actual Effects of Selected Programmes. Paris: OCDE/GD(97)105.
62. OECD. 1998. Evaluation of Progress in Developing and Implementing National Environmental Action Programmes in Central and Eastern Europe and the New Independent States. Final Report. Paris.
63. OECD. 1999. Environmental Taxes. Recent Developments in China and OECD Countries. Parti.
64. OECD Seminar. 2000. Public Access to Environmental Information Proceedings Athens 5-7 June Paris: ENV/EPOC/GEP(2000)8.
65. OECD 2001a. Environmentally Related Taxes in OECD Countries. Issues and Strategies. Paris.
66. OECD 2001b. Environmental Performance Review. Germany. Paris.
67. Radaelli, C.M. 2000. Policy-Transfer in the European Union: Institutional Isomorphism as a Source of Legitimacy, Governance 13(1): 25-43.
68. Rogers, E.M. 1962/1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York.
69. Rose, R. 1991. What is Lesson-Drawing?, Journal of Public Policy 11: 3-30.
70. Rose, R. 1993. Lesson Drawing in Public Policy. A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham.
71. Ruggie, J.G. 1998. What makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52(4): 855-885.
72. Scharpf, F.W. 1993. Positive und negative Koordination in Verhandlungssystemen, in: A. Heritier (ed.), Policy-Analyse (57-83). Politische Vierteljahrsschrift Sonderheft 24.
73. Scharpf, F.W. 1994. Optionen des Förderalismus in Deutschland und Europa. Frankfurt/Main and New York.
74. Scharpf, F. W. 1999. Regieren in Europa. Effectiv kund demokratisch? Frankfurt/New York.
75. Schimmelfennig, F. 1998. Liberal Norms and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union: A Case for Sociological Institutionalism, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 27(4): 459-472.
76. Schlegelmilch, K. 1999. Energiesteuern in Europa-Überblick und Perspektiven, in: Bundestagsfraktion Bündnis 980/Die Grünen [ed.], Blick nach Vorn. Antorderungen an die weiteren Stufen der Ökologischen Steuerreform (10-29). Tagungsbericht. Bonn.
77. Social Learning Group. 2001. Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: A Comparative History of Social Response to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion and Acid Rain. Cambridge.
78. Stone, D. 1999. Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy across Time, Space and Disciplines, Politics 19(1): 51-59.
79. Stone, D. 2000. Non-Governmental Policy-Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes, Governance 13(1): 45-62.
80. Strang, D. and Soule, S.A. 1998. Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills, Annual Review of Sociology 24: 265-290.
81. UN Commission on Sustainable Development. 1995. General Discussion of Progress in the Implementation of Agenda 21, Focusing on Cross-Sectoral Issues and the Critical Elements of Sustainability. Report of the Secretary-General. www.un.org/ documents/ecosoc/cn17/1995/ecn171995-12.htm.
82. Teir, G. 1999. Environmental Energy Taxes: The Experience of Finland, in: OECD 1999: Environmental Taxes. Recent Developments in China and OECD Countries (303-308). Paris.
83. Tews, K. 2000. Umweltpolitik per Oktroi?, in: R.H. Hasse and C. Kunze (eds.), Die Osterweiterung der EU: Reformerfordernisse und Anpassungsleistungen (85-113). Leipzig.
84. Tews, K. 2001. Politiktransfer. Phänomen zwischen Policy-Lemnen und Oktroi. Überlegungen zu unfreiwilligen Umweltpolitikimporten am Beispiel der EU-Osterweiterung. FFU-report 01-07. Berlin. www.fu-berlin.de/ffu/Publikationen/index.htm
85. Walker, J.L. 1969. The Diffusion of Innovations Among American States, The American Political Science Review 63:880-899.
86. WTO. 1999. Trade and Environment. Special Studies 4. Geneva.