Tax price effects on attitudes to hypothecated tax increases

Journal of Public Economics

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 417-438

  Hall, John ^a   Preston, Ian ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR FISCAL STUDIES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

H4

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042780949     PISSN: 00472727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00074-2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bergstrom T.C., Goodman R.P. Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review. 63:1973;280-296.
2. Bergstrom T.C., Rubinfeld D.L., Shapiro P. Micro-based estimates of the demand function for local school expenditures. Econometrica. 50:1982;1183-1205.
3. Brook L., Hall J.D., Preston I.P. What drives support for higher public spending. Taylor-Gooby P.F. Choice and Public Policy. 1998;Macmillan, London.
4. Brook L., Hall J.D., Preston I.P. Public spending and taxation. Jowell R., Curtice J., Park A., Brook L., Thomson K. British Social Attitudes: The 13th Report. 1996;Dartmouth, Aldershot.
5. Browne M.W., Arminger G. Specification and estimation of mean- and covariance-structure models. Arminger G., Clogg C.C., Sobel M.E. Handbook of Statistical Modelling For the Social and Behavioural Sciences. 1995;Plenum Press, New York.
6. Diamond P.A., Hausman J.A. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 8:1994;45-64.
7. Green D., Jacowitz K., Kahneman D., McFadden D. Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring and willingness to pay for public goods. paper presented at Econometric Society 7th World Congress, Tokyo :1995.
8. Hajivassiliou V.A., Ruud P.A. Classical estimation methods for LDV models using simulation. Engle R.F., McFadden D.L. Handbook of Econometrics. Vol. 4:1994;Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
9. Hall, J.D., Preston, I.P., 1998, Public and private choice in UK health insurance, Institute for Fiscal Studies Working Paper W98/19.
10. Hanemann W.M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 8:1994;19-43.
11. Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys To Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. 1989;Resources for the Future, Washington.
12. Muthén B.O. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika. 49:1984;115-132.
13. Muthén B.O., Satorra A. Technical aspects of Muthén's LISCOMP approach to estimation of latent variable relations with a comprehensive measurement model. Psychometrika. 60:1995;489-503.
14. Preston I.P., Ridge M.E. Demand for local public spending: evidence from the British Social Attitudes survey. Economic Journal. 105:1995;644-660.
15. Rubinfeld D.L. The economics of the local public sector. Auerbach A.J., Feldstein M. Handbook of Public Economics. Vol. II:1987;Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
16. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 185:1974;1124-1131.