Testing the test of the test: A response to "multiple inquiry in the validation of writing tests"

Assessing Writing

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 111-122

  Moss, Pamela A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042764699     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1075-2935(99)80008-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AERA, APA, and NCME (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Authors.
2. Behar, R. (1995). Writing in my father's name. A diary of Translated Woman's first year. In R. Behar & D. A. Gordon (Eds.). Women writing culture (pp. 65-84). Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Wainer (Ed.). Test validity. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Cronbach, L. J. (1989). Construct validation after thirty years. In R. L. Linn (Ed.). Intelligence: Measurement, theory and public policy (pp. 147-171). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
6. Dreyfus, H. L. & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
8. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
9. Gere, A. R. (1997). Intimate practices: Literacy and cultural work in U. S. Women's Clubs, 1880-1920. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
10. Hoy, D. C. (1994). Critical theory and critical history. In D. C. Hoy & T. McCarthy, Critical theory (pp. 101-214). Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Kogler, H. H. (1996). The power of dialogue (P. Hendrickson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after postructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 32 (4), 673-693..
13. Luke, A. (1995). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21, 3-48.
14. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. Educational measurement (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: The American Council on Education and the National Council on Measurement in Education.
15. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23 (2), 13-24.
16. Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62 (3), 229-258.
17. Moss, P. A. (1995). Themes and variations in validity theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14 (2), 5-13.
18. Moss, P. A. (1996). Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voices from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher, 25 (1), 20-28, 43.
19. Moss, P. A., Schultz, A. M., & Collins, K. M. (in press). An integrative approach to portfolio evaluation for teacher licensure. Journal for Personnel Evaluation in Education.
20. Shepard, L. A. (1993). Evaluating test validity. Review of Research in Education, 19, 405-450.
21. Shepard, L. A. (1997). The centrality of test use and consequences for test validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 5-8, 13, 24.
22. Willard, M. K. (1996). Interanimating voices: Theorizing the turn toward reflective writing in the academy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Modern Language Association, Washington, D.C.