The use of apomorphies in taxonomic defining

Taxon

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 105-107

  Monsch, Kenneth A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WROC AW   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TAXONOMY;

EID: 0042763877     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3647307     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Benton, M. J. 2000. Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead? Biol. Rev. 75: 633-648.
2. Block, B. A., Finnerty, J. R., Stewart, A. F. R. & Kidd, J. 1993. Evolution of endothermy in fish: mapping physiological traits on molecular phylogeny. Science 260: 210-214.
3. Cantino, P. D. & de Queiroz, K. 2000. "PhyloCode: A Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature". http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode.
4. de Queiroz, K. 2000. The definitions of taxon names: a reply to Stuessy. Taxon 49: 533-536.
5. de Queiroz, K. & Cantino, P. D. 2001. Taxon names, not taxa, are defined. Taxon 50: 821-826.
6. de Queiroz, K. & Ganthier, J. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39: 307-322.
7. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449-480.
8. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1994. Towards a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27-31.
9. Dyke, G. J. 2002. Should paleontologists use "phylogenetic" nomenclature? J. Paleontol. 75: 793-796.
10. Gago, F. J. 1997. Character evolution and phylogeny of the cutlassfishes: an ontogenetic perspective (Scombroidei: Trichiuridae). Bull. Mar. Sci. 60: 161-191.
11. Griffiths, P. E. 1999. Squaring the circle: natural kinds with historical essences. Pp. 209-228 in: Wilson, R. A. (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
12. Härlin, M. 1998. Taxonomic names and phylogenetic trees. Zool. Scr. 27: 381-390.
13. Härlin, M. & Sundberg, P. 1998. Taxonomy and philosophy of names. Biol. and Phil. 13: 233-244.
14. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, ed. 4. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London.
15. Klnge, A. G. In press. Taxonomy in theory and practice, with arguments for a new phylogenetic system of taxonomy. In: Donnelly, M. A., Crother, B. I., Guyer, C., Wake, M. H. & White, M. E. (eds.), Ecology and Evolution in the Tropics: A Herpetological Perspective. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. Leakey, M. G., Spoor, F., Brown, F. H., Gathogo, P. N., Kiarie, C., Leakey, L. N. & McDongall, I. 2001. New hominid genus from eastern Africa shows diverse middle Pliocene lineages. Nature 410: 433-440.
17. Lee, M. S. Y. 2001. On recent arguments for phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 50: 175-180.
18. Nixon, K. C. & Carpenter, J. M. 2000. On the other "phylogenetic systematics". Cladistics 16: 298-318.
19. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. Pp. 21-74 in: Joysey, K. A. & Friday, A. E. (eds.), Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 12. Academic Press, London.
20. Powell, C. L., Edwards, D. & Trewin, N. H. 2000. A new vascular plant from the Lower Devonian Windyfield chert, Rhynie, NE Scotland. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 90: 331-349.
21. Stuessy, T. F. 2000. Taxon names are not defined. Taxon 49: 231-233.
22. Stuessy, T. F. 2001. Taxon names are still not defined. Taxon 50: 185-186.
23. Tyler, J. C., Johnson, G. D., Nakamura I. & Collette, B. B. 1989. Morphology of Luvarus imperialis (Luvaridae), with a phylogenetic analysis of the Acanthuroidei (Pisces). Smiths. Contr. Zool. 485: i-vi, 1-78.