Effect of air-powder system on titanium surface on fibroblast adhesion and morphology

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 81-86

  Awad Shibli, Jamil ^a,b   Gonzales Silverio, Karina ^a   Compagnoni Martins, Marilia ^a   Marcantonio, Elcio ^a   Rossa, Carlos ^a,b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell culture; Fibroblasts; Maintenance; Scanning electron microscopy; Titanium

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TITANIUM;

AIR; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL SIZE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; DENTURE; FIBROBLAST; GINGIVA; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; POWDER; PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

AIR; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL SIZE; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROPHYLAXIS; FIBROBLASTS; GINGIVA; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POWDERS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 0042760301     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ID.0000042506.95943.BC     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Listgarten MA, Lang NP, Schroeder HE, et al. Periodontal tissues and their counterparts around endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1991; 2: 1-19.
2. Augthun M, Tinschert J, Huber A. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 69: 857-864.
3. Jansen JA, den Braber ET, Walboomers XF, et al. Soft tissue and epithelial models. Adv Dent Res. 1999; 13: 57-66.
4. Brunette DM. The effect of implant surface topography of the behavior of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988; 3: 231-246.
5. Brunette DM, Chehroudi B. The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomech Eng. 1999; 121: 49-57.
6. Inoue I, Cox JE, Pilliar RM, et al. Effect of the geometry of smooth and porous-coated titanium alloy on the orientation of fibroblasts in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987; 21: 107-126.
7. Pitaru S, Gray A, Aubin JE, et al. The influence of the morphological and chemical nature of dental surfaces on the migration, attachment, and orientation of human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. J Periodont Res. 1984; 19: 408-418.
8. Ruhling A, Hellweg A, Kocher T, et al. Removal of HA and TPS implant coatings and fibroblast attachment on exposed surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12: 301-308.
9. Gamal AY, Mailhot JM, Garnick JJ, et al. Human periodontal ligament fibroblast response to PDGF-BB and IGF-1 application on tetracycline HCl conditioned root surfaces. J Clin Periodontol. 1998; 25: 404-412.
10. Rossa C Jr, Silvério KG, Zanin ICJ, et al. Root instrumentation with Er:YAG laser. Effect on the morphology of fibroblasts. Quintessence Int. 2002; 33: 496-502.
11. Thomson-Neal D, Evans GH, Meffert RM. Effects of various prophylactic treatments on titanium, sapphire, and hydroxyapatite-coated implants: A SEM study. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1989; 9: 301-311.
12. Fox SC, Moriarty JD, Kusy RP. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: An in vitro study. J Periodontol. 1990; 61: 485-490.
13. Rapley JW, Swan RH, Hallmon WW, et al. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5: 47-52.
14. McCollum J, O’Neal RB, Brennan WA, et al. The effect of titanium implant abutment surface irregularities on plaque accumulation in vivo. J Periodontol. 1992; 63: 802-805.
15. Mengel R, Buns CE, Mengel C, et al. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13: 91-96.
16. Barnes CM, Fleming LS, Mueninghoff LA. An SEM evaluation of the in-vitro effects of an air-abrasive system on various implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991; 6: 463-469.
17. Gould TR, Brunette DM, Westbury L. The attachment mechanism of epithelial cells to titanium in vitro. J Periodontal Res. 1981; 16: 611-616.
18. Meyle J, Gultig K, Nisch W. Variation in contact guidance by human cells on a microstructured surface. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995; 29: 81-88.
19. Guy SC, McQuade MJ, Scheidt MJ, et al. In vitro attachment of human gingival fibroblasts to endosseous implant materials. J Periodontol. 1993; 64: 542-546.
20. Sauberlich S, Klee D, Ernst-Jurgen H, et al. Cell culture tests for assessing the tolerance of soft tissue to variously modified titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999; 10: 379-393.
21. Dmytryk JJ, Fox SC, Moriarty JD. The effects of scaling titanium implant surfaces with metal and plastic instruments on cell attachment. J Periodontol. 1990; 61: 491-496.
22. Kononen M, Hormian M, Kivilahti J, et al. Effect of surface processing on the attachment, orientation, and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992; 26: 1325-1341.
23. Eisenbarth E, Meyle J, Nachtigall W, et al. Influence of the surface structure of titanium materials on the adhesion of fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 1996; 17: 1399-1403.
24. Santos Ar Jr, Barbanti SH, Duek EA, et al. Vero cell growth and differentation on poly(L-lactic acid) membranes of different pore diameters. Artif Organs. 2001; 25: 7-13.