Product differentiation alternatives: Identity preservation, segregation, and traceability

AgBioForum

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 30-42

  Smyth, Stuart ^a   Phillips, Peter W B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Identity preserved production and marketing; IPPM; Segregation; Supply chain management; Traceability

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042750509     PISSN: 1522936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Bender, K., and Hill, L. (2000). Producer alternatives in growing specialty corn and soybeans (AE-4732). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.stratsoy.uiuc.edu/ specialty_corn_beans.pdf.
2. Bender, K., Hill, L., Wenzel, B., and Hornbaker, R. (1999). Alternative market channels for specialty corn and soybeans (AE-4726). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
3. Bullock, D.S., Desquilbet, M., and Nitsi, E. (2000, July-August). The economics of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Tampa, FL.
4. th International Conference of the International Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology Research (ICABR), Ravello, Italy.
5. Buckwell, A., Brookes, G., and Bradley, D. (1999). Economics of identity preservation for genetically modified crops. Food Biotechnology Communications Initiative.
6. Canadian Grain Commission. (1998, December). Identity preserved systems in the Canadian grain industry (discussion paper). Winnipeg, Manitoba: Canadian Grain Commission. Available on the World Wide Web: http://dsp-psd.communication. gc.ca/Collection/A93-20-1998E.pdf.
7. Canadian Grains Council. (2002, February 11). Food safety/IP/traceability workshop. Winnipeg, Manitoba.
8. Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2001). Matters arising from Codex committees and task forces: Traceability. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Avail able on the World Wide Web: ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/ccexec49/al0121ee.pdf.
9. Dickinson, D.L., and Bailey, D. (2001). Meat traceability: Are U.S. consumers willing to pay for it? (UAES Journal Paper 7458). Personally requested.
10. European Union. (2001). Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Available on the World Wide Web: http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/biotech/biotech09_en.pdf.
11. Fearne, A., and García Martinez, M. (1999). The assured combinable crop scheme in England and Wales: Carrot or stick? Farm Management, 10(5), 243-261.
12. Good, D., Bender, K., and Hill, L. (2000). Marketing of specialty corn and soybean crops (AE-4733). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. Available on the World Wide Web: http://web.aces.uiuc.edu/value/ marketingspecialty.pdf.
13. Herrman, T., Boland, M., and Heishman, A. (1999). Economic feasibility of wheat segregation at country elevators. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.css.orst.edu/nawg/1999/herman.html.
14. Jack, D., Pardoe, T., and Ritchie, C. (1998). Scottish quality cereals and coastal grains: Combinable crop assurance in action. Supply Chain Management, 3, 134-138.
15. Kalaitzandonakes, N., Maltsbarger, R., and Barnes, J. (2001). Global identity preservation costs in agricultural supply chains. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49, 605-615.
16. Kennett, J. (1997). An examination of bread wheat quality and its effect on vertical co-ordination in the wheat supply chain. Master's thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.
17. Kennett, J., Fulton, M., Molder, P., and Brooks, H. (1998). Supply chain management: The case of a UK baker preserving the identity of Canadian milling wheat. Supply Chain Management, 3(3), 157-166.
18. Lin, W. (2002). Estimating the costs of segregation for non-biotech maize and soybeans. In V. Santaniello, R.E. Evenson, and D. Zilberman (Eds.), Market development for genetically modified foods. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.
19. Miranowski, J.A., Moschini, G., Babcock, B., Duffy, M., Wisner, R., Beghin, J., et al. (1999). Economic perspectives on GMO market segregation (staff paper 298). Ames, IA: Iowa State University. Available on the World Wide Web: http://agecon. lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/detailview.pl?paperid=1768.
20. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. (2001). Synergy awards for R&D partnerships. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.nserc.ca/ synergy/articles/01canam_e.htm
21. Picciotto, R. (1995). Putting institutional economics to work: From participation to governance (discussion paper 304). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
22. Smyth, S., and Phillips, P.W.B. (2002). Competitors co-operating: Establishing a supply chain to manage genetically modified canola. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 4(1), 51-66.
23. Timon, D., and O'Reilly, S. (1998). An evaluation of traceability systems along the Irish beef chain. In C. Viau (Ed.), Long-term prospects for the beef industry (pp. 219-225). Paris: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.
24. Wilson, N., and Clarke, W. (1998). Food safety and traceability in the agricultural supply chain: Using the Internet to deliver traceability. Supply Chain Management, 3, 127-133.