Accuracy of three dry-chemistry methods for lipid profiling and risk factor classification

International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 358-368

  Rubin, Daniela A ^a   McMurray, Robert G ^a   Harrell, Joanne S ^b   Carlson, Barbara W ^b   Bangdiwala, Shrikant ^c  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

Author keywords

CHD risk factors; Cholesterol; HDL cholesterol; Triglycerides

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; LIPID; TRIACYLGLYCEROL;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CAPILLARY BLOOD; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE TEST; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIET RESTRICTION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LABORATORY; LIPID ANALYSIS; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PLASMA; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TECHNIQUE; TRIACYLGLYCEROL BLOOD LEVEL; VENOUS BLOOD;

EID: 0042738064     PISSN: 1526484X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/ijsnem.13.3.358     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Assman, G., H. Brinkers, H. Schulte et al. Comparison of the reflectance method (Reflotron reflectance photometer) with the absorbance method (automatic analyzers) for the determination of cholesterol. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 27:961-966, 1989.
2. Bard, R.L., L.A. Kaminsky, M.H. Whaley et al. Evaluation of lipid profile measurements obtained form the Cholestech LDX Analyzer. J. Cardiopulmon. Rehabil. 17:413-418, 1997.
3. Bland, J.M., and D.G. Altman. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307-310, 1986.
4. Cobbaert, C., G.J. Boerma, and J. Lindemans. Evaluation of the Cholestech L.D.X. desktop analyzer for Cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triacylglycerols in heparinized venous blood. Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 32:391-394, 1994.
5. Expert Panel on Detection and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). J. Am. Med. Assoc. 258:2486-2496, 2001.
6. Friedewald, W.T., R.E. Levy, and S.S. Fredrickson. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma without the use of preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin. Chem. 18:499-502, 1972.
7. Gregory L.C., S.H. Duh, and R.H. Christenson. Eight compact analysis system evaluated for measuring total cholesterol. Clin. Chem. 40:579-585, 1994.
8. Kannel, W.B., W. Castelli, T. Gordon et al. Serum cholesterol, lipoproteins, and risk of coronary heart disease: the Framingham study. Ann. Int. Med. 74:1-12, 1971.
9. Kaplan, L.A., and A.J. Pesce. Clinical Chemistry: Theory, Analysis and Correlation. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby, 1989.
10. Miller, W.G., J.M. McKenney, M.R. Conner et al. Total error assessment of five methods for cholesterol screening. Clin. Chem. 39:297-304, 1993.
11. Roeschlau, P., E. Bent, W. Gruber et al. Enzymatic determination of total cholesterol in serum. Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem. 12:226, 1974.
12. Rogers E.J., L. Misner, I.S. Ockene et al. Evaluation of seven Cholestech LDX analyzers for total cholesterol determinations. Clin. Chem. 39:860-864, 1993.
13. Rohac, M., and F. Gabl. Comparison of two solid phase chemistry systems: Reflotron and Ektachem DT 60. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 25:811-821, 1987.
14. Summerton, A.M., and N. Summerton. The use of desk-top cholesterol analyzers in general practice. Public Health 109:363-367, 1995.
15. Sugiuchi, H., Y. Uji, H. Okabe et al. Direct measurement of high-density liporpotein cholesterol in serum with polyethylene glycol-modified enzymes and sulfated a-cyclodextrin. Clin. Chem. 41:717-723, 1995.
16. Szaflarski, N., and R.E. Slaughter. Technology assessment in critical care: Understanding statistical analysis used to asses agreement between methods of clinical measurement. Am. J. Crit. Care 5:207-216, 1996.
17. Volles, D.F., J.M. McKenney, W.G. Miller et al. Analytic and clinical performance of two compact cholesterol-testing devices. Pharmacotherapy 18:184-192, 1998.
18. von Schenck, H., L. Treichl, B. Tilling et al. Laboratory and field evaluation of three desktop instruments for assay of cholesterol and triglyceride. Clin. Chem. 33:1230-1232, 1987.
19. nd English ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1974.