Multi-section magnetic susceptibility perfusion echo-planar imaging of the breast

Nippon Acta Radiologica

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 214-220

  Mitsuhiro, Tozaki ^a   Yasushi, Fukuda ^a   Kunihiko, Fukuda ^a  

^a JIKEI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Echo planar imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perfusion study

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0042736587     PISSN: 00480428     EISSN: 13477951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al: Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 191: 625-631, 1994
2. Boetes C, Strijk SP, Holland R, et al: False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 7: 1231-1234, 1997
3. Fobben ES, Rubin CZ, Kalisher L, et al: Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 196: 143-152, 1995
4. Gilles R, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, et al: Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20: 9-14, 1996
5. Muller-Schimpfle M, Stoll P, Stern W, et al: Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography? AJR Am J Roentgenol 168: 1323-1329, 1997
6. Fischer U, Kopka L, Brinck U, et al: Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 7: 1002-1005, 1997
7. Kuhl CK, Bieling H, Gieseke J, et al: T2* susceptibility-contrast, first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 202: 87-95, 1997
8. Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Vainio J, et al: Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 216: 545-553, 2000
9. Delille JP, Slanetz PJ, Yeh ED, et al: Breast cancer: regional blood flow and blood volume measured with magnetic susceptibility-based MR imaging-initial results. Radiology 223: 558-565, 2002
10. Weind KL, Maier CF, Rutt BK, et al: Invasive carcinomas and fibroadenomas of the breast: comparison of microvessel distributions-implications for imaging modalities. Radiology 208: 477-483, 1998
11. Dannert S, Kruck W, Schick F, et al: MR tomographic characterization of suspicious breast lesions with dynamic susceptibility-weighted T2* sequences. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173: 38-43, 2001
12. Orel SG, Schnall MD: MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220: 13-30, 2001
13. Kawashima M, Tamaki Y, Nonaka T, et al: MR imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179: 179-183, 2002
14. Qayyum A, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL, et al: MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178: 1227-1232, 2002
15. Tozaki M, Toi M, Miyamoto Y, et al: Power Doppler sonography of breast masses: correlation of Doppler spectral parameters with tumor angiogenesis and histologic growth pattern. J Ultrasound Med 19: 593-600, 2000