Australian telecommunications policy in an international context: Issues for the future

Prometheus (United Kingdom)

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 51-65

  Joseph, R A ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Competition; Industry policy; International telecommunications; Telecommunications policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042727302     PISSN: 08109028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08109029608632016     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Peter Drahos and Richard A Joseph, 'Telecommunications and investment in the great supranational regulatory game', Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 19, No. 8, 1995, pp. 619-635
2. These principles (MFN, National Treatment and Transparency) are more broadly applicable than in the GATS but are closely linked to international trade policy in this context.. For a discussion of these principles see Industries Commission, Annual Report 1994-95, AGPS, Canberra, 1995
3. Phillip Evans, Unpacking the GATT: A Step by Step Guide to the Uruguay Round, International Organisation of Consumers Unions, London, 1994, p. 32.
4. Peter Drahos, 'Global Property Rights in Information: The Story of TRIPS at the GATT', Prometheus, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1995, pp. 6-19
5. Peter Drahos, 'Information Feudalism in the Information Society', The Information Society, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1995, pp. 209-222; P Hirst and G Thompson, 'Globalisation, foreign direct investment and international economic governance', Organization, Vol.1, No.2, 1994, pp. 277-303
6. Peter Drahos, 'Information Feudalism in the Information Society', The Information Society, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1995, pp. 209-222; P Hirst and G Thompson, 'Globalisation, foreign direct investment and international economic governance', Organization, Vol.1, No.2, 1994, pp. 277-303
7. Department of Communications and the Arts, Beyond the Duopoly: Australian Telecommunications Policy and Regulation, Issues Paper September 1994, DOCA, Canberra, 1994
8. ibid., pp. 42-43
9. Michael Lee, Minister for Communications and the Arts, 'A New Era in Telecommunications', News Release C76/95, 1 August 1995
10. Innovate Australia, 6 December 1995 - available from the Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Canberra. The Information and Communications Services and Technologies Strategy is contained in these set of papers.
11. ibid., Section 10.2, Information and Communications Services and Technologies Strategy.
12. Department of Communications and the Arts, Annual Report 1994-95, AGPS, Canberra, 1995, p. 41
13. ibid., p. 42
14. DFAT, Winning Markets: Australia's Future in the Global Economy, AGPS, Canberra, 1995 cited in Industries Commission, Annual Report 1994-95, AGPS, Canberra, 1995, p. 115
15. Lisa Filipetto, 'A key role in trade development', Insight, 4 April 1995, p. 5 (Insight is an internal magazine produced by DFAT).
16. ibid.
17. DFAT and DCA, 'WTO: Negotiating Group on Basic Telecommunications', Internal Briefing Paper, DFAT, April 1995
18. John Parry, 'WTO sets out to reshpare telecoms', TELECOM 95 Daily, 9.10.95, cited in Teleclippings, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, No. 931, October/November 1995, pp. 33-34
19. National Information Services Council, Agenda papers from the first meeting of the Council, 10 August 1995, Office of the Chief Scientist, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra, August 1995, p. 93
20. Don Lamberton, 'Globaloney: The Impact of Regions on the Future of Emerging Markets in Information Technology and Trade', Padific Telecommunications Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1993, pp. 3-10
21. Anon, 'Reviews, Inquiries, Reports Current and Foreshadowed', Communications Update, Issue 102, August 1994, pp. 12-13
22. House of Representatives Standing Committee for Long Term Strategies, Australia as an Information Society: Grasping New Paradigms, AGPS, Canberra, 1991; The Government's response to the above report was tabled in Parliament on 16 December 1992.
23. For example, DFAT has produced several descriptive booklets on the outcomes of the Uruguay Round but little detailed publicly available literature on Australia's involvement in WTO with respect to telecommunications is available from DFAT. Details of US strategic planning are contained in Office of Technology Assessment (US Congress), US Telecommunications Services in European Markets, US Government Printing Office, August 1993, pp. 135-158
24. OECD, Trade and Competition Policies: Comparing Objectives and Methods, Trade Policy Issues 4, OECD, Paris, 1994
25. DOCA, Beyond the Duopoly, op.cit., p. 43
26. Industries Commission, Annual Report 1994-95, op.cit., p. 92
27. ibid., p. 93
28. Anon, 'Japan attacks trade breach', Illawarra Mercury, 26 August 1995, p. 22; David Hartquist, 'A Perspective on US Trade and Investment Initiatives in the Asia Pacific Region', Address to the John Curtin Centre, Sydney, 30 October 1995; Nigel Wilson, 'WTO may act over trade rules: lobbyist', The Australian, 1 November 1995, p.6
29. Anon, 'Japan attacks trade breach', Illawarra Mercury, 26 August 1995, p. 22; David Hartquist, 'A Perspective on US Trade and Investment Initiatives in the Asia Pacific Region', Address to the John Curtin Centre, Sydney, 30 October 1995; Nigel Wilson, 'WTO may act over trade rules: lobbyist', The Australian, 1 November 1995, p.6
30. Michael Lee, op.cit., Policy Principles 90-92.
31. Trevor Barr, The New Zealand Experiment in the Liberalisation of Telecommunications, CIRCIT, Research Report No 10, CIRCIT, Melbourne, 1995
32. Donald Lamberton, 'The Infrastructure Concept: a neglected policy element', paper presented to the Bureau of Transport and Communications Economics Communications Research Forum 1995, Gazebo Hotel, Sydney, 19-20 October 1995
33. See for example Richard A Joseph, 'Direct foreign investment in telecommunications: a review of attitudes in Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany and the UK', Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 19, No. 5, 1995, pp. 413-426; Peter Drahos and Richard A Joseph, op.cit.
34. See for example Richard A Joseph, 'Direct foreign investment in telecommunications: a review of attitudes in Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany and the UK', Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 19, No. 5, 1995, pp. 413-426; Peter Drahos and Richard A Joseph, op.cit.
35. Lenore Taylor, 'Howard to limit Telstra sell-off', The Australian, 24 Janaury, 1996, pages 1,4,31
36. Anon, '100 per cent Oz-owned: Lee', Communications Update, Issue 114, September 1995, pp. 4-5
37. Senate Economics References Committee, Connecting You Now...Telecommunicalions to the Year 2000, AGPS, Canberra, 1995
38. Commission of the European Communities, 'A Level Playing for Direct Investment World-Wide', Communication from the Commission, COM (95) 42 final, Brussels, 01.03.1995
39. Michael A Calvano, 'Developing the Altruistic Telecommunication Enterprise, Human Resources Development Quarterly (International Telecommunication Union, Geneva), No. 59, April 1995, pp. 2-13
40. Don Lamberton, 'Globaloney....', op.cit., p. 5
41. Liberal and National Parties, Better Communications: Liberal and National Parties' Policy 1996, Liberal and National Party, mimeo, Canberra, 1996 (available from Parliament House, Canberra).