Exploration, exploitation and adaptive rationality: The neo-Schumpeterian perspective

Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory

Volumn 10, Issue 5-7, 2002, Pages 297-320

  Lee, Jeho ^a   Ryu, Young U ^b  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolution; Exploration and exploitation; Innovation; Schumpeterian competition

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG PRODUCTS PLANTS; FEEDBACK; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EVOLUTION; EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION; INNOVATION; SCHUMPETERIAN COMPETITION;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0042720314     PISSN: 1569190X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1569-190X(02)00084-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Arrow K.J. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. Nelson R. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. 1962;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Arthur W.B. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. 1994;University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
3. Burgleman R.A. Fading memories: a process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly. 39:1994;24-56.
4. Chabala J.C. Historical overview of the developing field of molecular diversity. Gordon E.M., Kerwin J.F. Combinatorial Chemistry and Molecular Diversity in Drug Discovery. 1998;John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5. Christensen C. The rigid disc drive industry: a history of commercial and technological turbulence. Business History Review. 67:1993;531-588.
6. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal. 99:1989;569-596.
7. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capability: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35:1990;128-152.
8. Cohen W.M., Levin R.C. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Schmalensee R., Willig R.D. Handbook of Industrial Organization. vol. II:1989;North-Holland, New York.
9. Collis D.J., Montgomery C.A. Corporate Strategy: Resources and the Scope of the Firm. 1997;Irwin, Boston, MA.
10. Cyert R.M., March J.G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. 1963;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11. Eigen M., Schuster P. The hypercycle: a principle of natural self-organization, Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle. Naturwissenschaften. 64:1977.
12. Goldberg D.E., Richardson J. Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. Genetic Algorithms and their Applications: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. 1987;41-49.
13. Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. 1989;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
14. Grabowski H.G., Vernon J.M. Pioneers, imitators, and generics: a simulation model of Schumpeterian competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 102:1987;491-525.
15. Graves S.B., Langowitz N.S. Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal. 14:1993;593-605.
16. Hannan M.T., Freeman J.H. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology. 82:1977;929-964.
17. Helfat C.E. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Science. 40:1994;1720-1747.
18. Henderson R.M., Clark K.B. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35:1990;9-30.
19. Holland J.H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. 1975;University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
20. Holland J.H. Genetic Algorithms. Scientific American. 1992;66-72.
21. Ijiri Y., Simon H.A. Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms. 1977;North-Holland, Amsterdam.
22. Kauffman S.A. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. 1995;Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Lant T.K., Mezias S.J. Managing discontinuous change: a simulation study of organizational learning and entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal. 11:1990;147-179.
24. Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal. 13:1992;111-126.
25. J. Lerner, A note on the venture capital industry. Harvard Business School Case no. 9-295-065, 1994.
26. Levinthal D.A., March J.G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal. 14:1993;95-112.
27. Levitt B., March J.G. Organization learning. Annual Review of Sociology. 14:1988;319-340.
28. March J.G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science. 2:1991;71-87.
29. Mitchell M., Forrest S., Holland J.H. The royal road for genetic algorithms: fitness landscapes and GA performance. Toward a Practice of Autonomous Systems: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life. 1991;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. Simulation of Schumpeterian competition. American Economic Review. 67(1):1977;271-276.
31. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. 1982;The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Schumpeter J.A. The Theory of Economic Development. 1934;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
33. Sharpe P., Keelin T. How SmithKline Beecham makes better resource-allocation decisions. Harvard Business Review. 1998;3-10.
34. M. Statman, Competition in the pharmaceutical industry: the declining profitability of drug innovation. Technical report, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC, 1983.
35. S. Thomke, A. Nimgade, P. Pospisil, Eli Lilly and company: drug development strategy (A). Harvard Business School Case, 1998.
36. Tirole J. The Theory of Industrial Organization. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Tushman M.L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly. 31:1986;439-465.
38. Utterback J.M. Mastering the dynamics of innovation; how companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. 1994;Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
39. Winter S.G. Satisficing, selection and the innovating remnant. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 85:1971;237-261.