Short forms of the Stanford-Binet intelligence scale: Fourth edition for screening potentially gifted preschoolers

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 226-235

  Volker, Martin A ^a   Guarnaccia, Vincent ^b   Scardapane, Joseph R ^b  

^a HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042709867     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Atkinson, L. (1991). Short forms of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition, for children with low intelligence. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 177-181.
2. Carvajal, H., & Gerber, J. (1987). 1986 Stanford-Binet abbreviated forms. Psychological Reports, 61, 285-286.
3. DeLamatre, J. E., & Hollinger, C. L. (1990). Utility of the Stanford-Binet IV abbreviated form for placing exceptional children. Psychological Reports, 67, 973-974.
4. Finch, A. J., Childress, W., & Ollendick, T. (1973). Comparison of separately administered and abstracted WISC short forms with the full scale WISC. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 755-756.
5. Glaub, V. E., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1991). Construction of a nonverbal adaptation of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 231-241.
6. Kaufman, A. S. (1977). Should short-form validity coefficients be corrected? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1159-1161.
7. King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1982). Wechsler short forms: A brief status report. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 433-438.
8. McCallum, R. S., & Karnes, F. A. (1990). Use of a brief form of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Fourth) for gifted children. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 279-283.
9. Nagle, R. J., & Bell, N. L. (1993). Validation of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition abbreviated batteries with college students. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 227-231.
10. Prewett, P. N. (1992). Short forms of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 10, 257-264.
11. Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children: Revised and updated third edition. San Diego: Author.
12. Silverstein, A. B. (1971). A corrected formula for assessing the validity of WAIS, WISC, and WPPSI short forms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 212-213.
13. Silverstein, A. B. (1977). Comment on Kaufman's "Should short form validity coefficients be corrected?" Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1162-1163.
14. Silverstein, A. B. (1982). Two- and four-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 415-418.
15. Silverstein, A. B. (1985). An appraisal of three criteria for evaluating the usefulness of WAIS-R short forms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(5), 676-680.
16. Tellegen, A., & Briggs, P. F. (1967). Old wine in new skins: Grouping Wechsler subtests into new scales. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31(5), 499-506.
17. Thompson, A. P. (1987). Methodological issues in the clinical evaluation of two- and four-subtest short forms of the WAIS-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 142-144.
18. Thompson, A. P., Howard, D., & Anderson, J. (1986). Two- and four-subtest short-forms of the WAIS-R: Validity in a psychiatric sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18, 287-293.
19. Thorndike, R. L., Hagan, E., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Guide for administering and scoring the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition. Chicago: Riverside.
20. Winner, E. (1997). Exceptionally high intelligence and schooling. American Psychologist, 52(10), 1070-1081.