Plant diversity in managed sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.) forests of Gorakhpur, India: Species composition, regeneration and conservation

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 12, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 2295-2319

  Pandey, S K ^a   Shukla, R P ^a  

^a D D U GORAKHPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Disturbance; Floristic composition; In situ conservation; Regeneration; Sal forest; Thicket

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; REGENERATION; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

INDIA;

CROTALARIA ALATA; DESMODIUM; DESMODIUM LATIFOLIUM; GLORIOSA SUPERBA; MOGHANIA; MOGHANIA CHAPPAR; PAPILIONOIDEAE; RAUVOLFIA SERPENTINA; SHOREA ROBUSTA;

EID: 0042709504     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024589230554     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ayyappan A. and Parthasarathy N. 1999. Biodiversity inventory of trees in a large scale permanent plot of tropical evergreen forest at Varagalaiar. Anamalais, Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 1533-1554.
2. Burgess R.L. 1978. Physiognomy and phytosociology of the international woodlands research sites. In: Reichle D.E. (ed.). Dynamic Properties of Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1-35.
3. Champion H.G. and Seth S.K. 1968. General Silviculture for India. Publication Branch, Department of Printing and Stationary Government of India, Delhi, India.
4. Chandrashekara U.M. and Ramakrishnan P.S. 1994. Vegetation and gap dynamics of a tropical wet evergreen forest in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10: 337-354.
5. Daniels R.J.R., Gadgil M. and Joshi N.V. 1995. Impact of human extraction on tropical humid forests in the Western Ghats in Uttara Kannada, South India. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 866-874.
6. De Angelis D.L., Gardner R.H. and O'Neill R.V. 1978. Productivity in Temperate Woodlands, CRC Handbook on Nutrition and Food. Chemical Rubber Co. Press, Cleveland, Ohio.
7. Engler A. and Prantl K. 1964. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 12th edn. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
8. Foster R.B. 1980. Heterogeneity and disturbance in tropical vegetation. In: Soule' M.E. and Wilcox B.A. (eds). Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. pp. 75-92.
9. Ganesh T., Ganesan R., Devy M.S., Davidar P. and Bawa K.S. 1996. Assessment of plant biodiversity at a mid elevation evergreen forest of Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve. Western Ghats, India. Current Science 71: 379-392.
10. Gentry A.H. 1995. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In: Bullock S.H., Mooney H.A. and Medina E. (eds), Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 146-194.
11. Grime J.P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology 86: 902-910.
12. Gupta O.P. and Shukla R.P. 1991. The composition and dynamics of associated plant communities of sal plantations. Tropical Ecology 32: 296-309.
13. Halpern C.B. and Spies T.A. 1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 5: 913-934.
14. Jha C.S. and Singh J.S. 1990. Composition and dynamics of dry tropical forest in relation to soil texture. Journal of Vegetation Science 1: 609-614.
15. Knight D.H. 1975. A phytosociological analysis of species rich tropical forest on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecological Monograph 45: 259-289.
16. Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Croom Helm, London.
17. Mori S.A., Boom B.M., Carbalho A.M. and Dos Santos T.S. 1983. Southern Bahain moist forest. Botanical Review 49: 155-232.
18. Mueller-Dombois D. and Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
19. Murali K.S., Uma Shankar, Uma Shaanker R., Ganeshaiah K.N. and Bawa K.S. 1996. Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forests of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India. 2. Impact of NTFP extraction on regeneration, population structure, and species composition. Economic Botany 50: 252-269.
20. Pande P.K. 1999. Comparative vegetation analysis and sal (Shorea robusta) regeneration in relation to their disturbance magnitude in some sal forests. Tropical Ecology 40: 51-61.
21. Pandey S.K. 2000. Population status and regeneration strategy of some perennial legumes in plantation forests of North-Eastern Uttar Pradesh, Ph.D. Thesis, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India.
22. Pandey S.K. and Shukla R.P. 1999. Plant diversity and community patterns along the disturbance gradient in plantation forests of sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn). Current Science 77: 814-818.
23. Pandey S.K. and Shukla R.P. 2001. Regeneration strategy and plant diversity status in degraded sal forests. Current Science 81: 95-102.
24. Pimm S.L., Russell G.J., Gittleman J.L. and Brooks T.M. 1995. The future of biodiversity. Science 269: 347-350.
25. Puyravaud J.P., Sridhar D., Gaulier A., Aravajy S. and Ramalingam R. 1995. Impact of fire on a dry deciduous forest in Bandipur National Park, Southern India: preliminary assessment and implications for management. Current Science 68: 745-751.
26. Rao P., Barik S.K., Pandey H.N. and Tripathi R.S. 1990. Community composition and tree population structure in a sub-tropical broadleaved forest along a disturbance gradient. Vegetatio 88: 151-162.
27. Richards P.W. 1952. The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study. Cambridge University Press, London.
28. Rundel P.W. 1989. Ecological success in relation to plant form and function in the woody legumes. In: Stirton C.H. and Zarucchi J.L. (eds), Advances in Legume Biology. Monograph of Systemic Botany. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri, pp. 377-398.
29. Shukla R.P. and Ramakrishnan P.S. 1986. Architecture and growth strategies of tropical trees in relation to successional status. Journal of Ecology 74: 33-46.
30. Silvertown J.W. 1987. Introduction to Plant Population Ecology. 2nd edn. ELBS/Longman, London.
31. Singh A., Reddy V.S. and Singh J.S. 1995. Analysis of woody vegetation of Corbett National Park, India. Vegetatio 120: 69-79.
32. Singh J.S. and Singh S.P. 1987. Forest vegetation of the Himalaya. Botanical Review 53: 80-92.
33. Srivastava T.N. 1976. Flora Gorakhpurensis. Today and Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers, New Delhi, India.
34. Sukumar R., Dattaraja H.S., Suresh H.S., Radhakrishnan J.V., Vasudeva R., Nirmala S. et al. 1992. Long term monitoring of vegetation in a tropical deciduous forest in Mudumalai, Southern India. Current Science 62: 608-616.
35. Sukumar R., Suresh H.S., Dattaraja H.S. and Joshi N.V. 1998. Dynamics of a tropical deciduous forest: Population changes (1988 through 1993) in a 50-ha plot at Mudumalai, southern India. In: Dallmeier F. and Comiskey J.A. (eds), Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modeling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies. The Parthenon Publishing Group, Camforth, UK, pp. 529-540.
36. Uma Shankar 2001. A case of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Current Science 81: 776-786.
37. Uma Shankar, Lama S.D. and Bawa K.S. 1998. Ecosystem reconstruction through 'taungya' plantations following commercial logging of dry mixed deciduous forests in Darjeeling Himalaya. Forest Ecology and Management 102: 131-142.
38. Working Plan 1991-1992. Working Plan of Gorakhpur Forest Division. Working Plan Circle, Nainital, India.