Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: Imaging findings and therapeutic implications in 26 surgically corrected patients

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 577-582

  Tann, Mark ^a,b   Maglinte, Dean ^a   Howard, Thomas J ^a   Sherman, Stuart ^a   Fogel, Evan ^a   Madura, James A ^a   Lehman, Glen A ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan; Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreatic pseudocyst; Pancreatic resection

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; SURGERY;

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE PANCREATOGRAPHY; IMAGING FEATURES; PANCREATIC DUCTS; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATIC PSEUDOCYST; PANCREATIC RESECTION; PSEUDOCYST;

DUCTS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DISCONNECTED PANCREATIC DUCT SYNDROME; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS DUCT STENOSIS; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREAS PSEUDOCYST; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0042706428     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200307000-00023     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kozarek RA. Endoscopic therapy of complete and partial pancreatic duct disruptions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1998;8:39-53.
2. Bradley EL 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993;128:586-590.
3. Howard TJ, Stonerock CE, Sarker J, et al. Contemporary treatment strategies for external pancreatic fistulas. Surgery. 1998;124:627-632; discussion 632-633.
4. Kozarek RA, Traverso LW. Pancreatic fistulas: etiology, consequences, and treatment. Gastroenterologist. 1996;4:238-244.
5. Balthazar EF, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990;174:331-336.
6. Elmas N. The role of diagnostic radiology in pancreatitis. Eur J Radiol. 2001;38:120-132.
7. Dalzell DP, Scharling ES, Ott DJ, et al. Acute pancreatitis: the role of diagnostic imaging. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1998;39:339-363.
8. Wyncoll DL. The management of severe acute narcotizing pancreatitis: an evidence-based review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:146-156.
9. Howard TJ, Wiebke EA, Mogavero G, et al. Classification and treatment of local septic complications in acute pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 1995;170:44-50.
10. Fielding GA, McLatchie GR, Wilson C, et al. Acute pancreatitis and pancreatic fistula formation. Br J Surg. 1989;76:1126-1128.
11. Tsiotos GG, Smith CD, Sarr MG. Incidence and management of pancreatic and enteric fistulas after surgical management of severe necrotizing pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 1995;130:48-52.
12. Findeiss LK, Brandabur J, Traverso LW, et al. Percutaneous embolization of the pancreatic duct with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in disconnected duct syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:107-111.
13. Howard TJ, Rhodes GJ, Selzer DJ, et al. Roux-en-Y internal drainage is the best surgical option to treat patients with disconnected duct syndrome after severe acute pancreatitis. Surgery. 2001;130:714-719; discussion 719-721.
14. Martin FM, Rossi RL, Munson JL, et al. Management of pancreatic fistulas. Arch Surg. 1989;124:571-573.
15. Bassi C, Butturini G, Salvia R, et al. A single-institution experience with fistulojejunostomy for external pancreatic fistulas. Am J Surg. 2000;179:203-206.
16. Ho HS, Frey CF. Gastrointestinal and pancreatic complications associated with severe pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 1995;130(8):817-822; discussion 822-823.
17. Ranson JHC, Rifkin KM, Rases DF, et al. Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;139:69-81.
18. Larvin M, McMahon MJ. APACHE-II score for the assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 1989;2:201-204.
19. Tervahartiala P, Kivisaari L, Kivisaari R, et al. Contrast media-induced renal morphologic lesions during experimental hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis. Invest Radial. 1992;27:1064-1068.
20. Hill MC, Huntington DK. Computed tomography and acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1990;19:811-842.
21. Uhl W, Roggo A, Kirschstein T, et al. Influence of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on course and outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2002;24:191-197.
22. Beger HG, Rau B, Mayer J, et al. Natural course of acute pancreatitis. World J Surg. 1997;21(2):130-135.
23. Büchler MW, Bloor B, Müller CA, et al. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: treatment strategy according to the status of infection. Ann Surg. 2000;232:619-626.
24. Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, et al. Transpapillary stenting for pancreaticocutaneous fistulas. J Gastrointest Surg. 1997;1:357-361.
25. Strasberg SM, McNevin MS. Results of a technique of pancreaticojejunostomy that optimizes blood supply to the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:591-596.
26. Michels NA. Blood Supply and Anatomy of the Upper Abdominal Organs. Philadelphia and Montreal: J.B. Lippincott; 1955.
27. Nitsche R, Folsch UR. Role of ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in acute pancreatitis. Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology. 1999;13:331-343.
28. Fan ST, Lai EC, Mok FP, et al. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med 1993;328:228-232.
29. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Yelon JA, et al. MRCP in the assessment of pancreatic duct trauma and its sequellae: preliminary findings. J Trauma. 2000;48:1001-1007.