Exploring the theories and consequences of self-assessment through ethical inquiry

Assessing Writing

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 199-227

  Schendel, Ellen ^b   O'Neill, Peggy ^a  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042705738     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00008-8     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Agnew, E. (1995). Rigorous grading does not raise standards: It only lowers grades. Assessing Writing, 2(1), 91-103
2. Allison, L., Bryant, L., & Hourigan, M. (1997). Grading in the post-process classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
3. Beach, R. (1989). Showing students how to assess: Demonstrating techniques for response in the writing conference. In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 127-148). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
4. Beach, R. (1982). The pragmatics of self-assessing. In R. A. Sudol (Ed.), Revising: New essays for teachers of writing (pp. 71-83). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
5. Beach, R. & Eaton, S. (1984). Factors influencing self-assessing and revising by college freshmen. In R. Beach & L. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 149-170). New York: Guilford, 1984.
6. Beason, L. (2000). Composition as service: Implications of utilitarian, duties, and care ethics. In M. A. Pemberton (Ed)., The Ethics of writing instruction: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 105-138). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
7. Beaven, M. (1977). Individualized goal-setting, self-evaluation, and peer evaluation. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging (pp. 135-156). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
8. Beck, A., Dautermann, J., Miller, C., Murray, K., & Powell, P. R. (1997). The best of Miami University's portfolios 1997. Oxford, OH: Department of English, Miami University.
9. Belanoff, P. (1998). Foreword. In F. Zak & C. Weaver (Eds.), The theory and practice of grading writing: Problems and possibilities (pp. ix-xi). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
10. Black, L., Daiker, D., Sommers, J., & Stygall, G. (1994). Writing like a woman and being rewarded for it: Gender, assessment, and reflective letters from Miami University's student portfolios. In L. Black, D. Daiker, J. Sommers, & G. Stygall (Eds.), New directions in portfolio assessment: Reflective practice, critical theory, and large-scale scoring (pp. 235-247). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
11. Bloom, L. Z. (1997). Why I (used to) hate to give grades. College Composition and Communication, 48, 360-371.
12. Borrowman, S. (1999). The trinity of portfolio placement: Validity, reliability, and curriculum reform. WPA: Council of Writing Program Administrators, 23(1/2), pp. 7-27.
13. Carbone, N., & Daisley, M. (1998). Grading as a rhetorical construct. In F. Zak & C. Weaver (Eds.), The theory and practice of grading writing: Problems and possibilities (pp. 77-94). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14. Chiseri-Strater, E. (1993). Evaluation as acts of reading, response, and reflection. In T. Newkirk (Ed.), Nuts and bolts: A practical guide to teaching college composition (pp. 179-202). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
15. Coles, W. E., Jr., & Vopat, J. (1985). What makes writing good? Lexington: Heath.
16. Conway, G. (1994). Portfolio cover letters, students' self-presentation, and teachers' ethics. In L. Black, D. Daiker, J. Sommers, & G. Stygall (Eds.), New directions in portfolio assessment: Reflective practice, critical theory, and large-scale scoring (pp. 83-92). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
17. Daiker, D. A., Sommers, J., & Stygall, G. (1996). The pedagogical implications of a college placement portfolio. In E. White, W. Lutz, & S. Kamusikiri (Eds.), Assessment of writing: Politics, policies, practices (pp. 257-270). New York, NY: MLA.
18. Elbow, P. (1997). Taking time out from grading and evaluating while working in a conventional system. Assessing Writing, 4, 5-28.
19. Elbow, P. (1993). Ranking, evaluating, and liking: Sorting out three forms of judgement. College English, 55, 187-206.
20. Faigley, L. (1992). Fragments of rationality: Postmodernity and the subject of composition. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
21. Faigley, L. (1989). Judging writing, judging selves. College Composition and Communication, 40, 395-412.
22. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-87.
23. Fontaine, S. I., & Hunter, S. M. (1998). Foregrounding ethical awareness in composition and English studies. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heineman.
24. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd. ed.). (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
25. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. Volume I: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1990.
26. Graves, D. H. (1994). Evaluate your own classroom. A fresh look at writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
27. Hanson, F. A. (1993). Testing, testing: The social consequences of the examined life. Berkeley, CA: Universtiy of California Press.
28. Harrington, S. M. (1997). Placing reflection/reflecting placement. Paper presented at the conference of the National Council of Teachers of English, Montreal, Canada.
29. Haswell, R., Schull-Johnson, L., & Wyche-Smith, S. (1994). Shooting Niagara: Making portfolio assessment serve instruction at a state university. WPA, 18, 44-55.
30. Huot, B. (1996). Toward a new theory of writing assessment. College Composition and Communication, 47(4), 549-566.
31. Johnston, P. (1989) Constructive evaluation and the improvement of teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 90(4), 509-528.
32. Kirby, S. C. (1987). Self-evaluation: A way to improve teaching and learning. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 14, 41-46.
33. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own competence leads to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134.
34. Messick, S. (1989a). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5-11.
35. Messick, S. (1989b). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement, third edition (pp. 13-103). Washington, DC: American Council on Education and National Council on Measurement in Education.
36. Mortenson, P., & Kirsch, G. (Eds.). (1996). Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
37. Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performative assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62, 229-258.
38. Moss, P. A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23(2), 5-12.
39. Moss, P.A. (1996). Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voices from interpretive traditions. Educational researcher 25.1, 20-28, 43.
40. Pemberton, M. (Ed.) (2000). The ethics of writing instruction: Issures in theory and practice. Greenwich, CT: Ablex/JAI.
41. Perl, S. (1979). The composing process of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.
42. Porter, J. E. (1998). Rhetorical ethics and internet writing. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
43. Reynolds, E. J. (2000). Inept people and placement. Writing program administration listserv, WPA-L@asu.edu, February 9.
44. Royer, D. J., & Gilles, R. (1998). Directed self-placement: An attitude of orientation. College Composition and Communication, 50, 54-70.
45. Sandman, J. (1993). Self-evaluation exit essays in freshman composition: 'Now I have a new weakness'. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 20, 275-278.
46. Shepard, L. (1997). The centrality of test use and consequences for test validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 5-24.
47. Shepard, L. (1993). Evaluating test validity. Review of Research in Education, 19, 405-450.
48. Sommers, J., Black L., Daiker, D., & Stygall, G. (1993). The challenges of rating portfolios: What WPAs can expect. WPA: Writing Program Administrators, 17, 7-29.
49. Strickland, K., Strickland, J., & Stillman, P. (1998). Reflection on assessment: Its purposes, methods, and effects on learning. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
50. White, E. M. (1994). Teaching and Assessing Writing (2nd ed.). Portland, ME: Calendar Islands.
51. Williamson, M., & Huot, B. (2000). Literacy, equality, and competence: Ethics in writing assessment. In M. Pemberton (Ed.), The ethics of writing instruction: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 191-209). Greenwich, CT: Ablex/JAI.
52. Yancey, K. B. (1998). Reflection in the writing classroom. Logon, UT: Utah State University Press.
53. Yancey, K. B., & Huot, B. (1998). Construction, deconstruction, and (over)determination: A Foucauldian analysis of grades. In F. Zak & C. Weaver (Eds.), The theory and practice of grading writing: Problems and possibilities (pp. 37-51). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
54. Yancey, K.B. & Weiser, I. (1997). Situating portfolios: An introduction. K.B. Yancey & I. Weiser (Eds.). Situating portfolios: Four perspectives, (pp. 1-17) Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
55. Zak, F. & Weaver, C. (Eds.) (1998). The theory and practice of grading writing: Problems and possibilities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.