The influence of gender and gender-pairings on clergy's identification of sexually ambiguous behavior as sexual harassment

Pastoral Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 295-304

  Frame, Marsha Wiggins ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042686814     PISSN: 00312789     EISSN: 15736679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02262820     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830-838.
2. Benson, D. J., & Thomson, G. (1982). Sexual harassment on a university campus: The confluence of authority relations, sexual interest and gender stratification. Social Problems, 29, 236-251.
3. Clark, D. C. (1993, April 14). Sexual abuse in the church: The law steps in. Christian Century, 396-398.
4. Collins, E. G. C., & Blodgett, T. B. (1981). Sexual harassment: Some see it. . .some won't. Harvard Business Review, 59, 76-95.
5. Cooper-White, P. (1991, February 4). Boundaries: Sex in the parish house. Christianity and Crisis, 51, 22-23.
6. Crull, P. (1982). Stress effects of sexual harassment on the job: Implications for counseling. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 539-544.
7. DeVogel, S. H. (1988, July/August). Sexual harassment in the church. The Christian Ministry, 12-14.
8. Dziech, B. W. (November 13, 1991). Colleges must help to unravel the bewildering complexities of sexual harassment. The Chronicle of Higher Education. B2.
9. Dziech, G., & Weiner, L. (1984). The lecherous professor Sexual harassment on campus. Boston: Beacon.
10. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1980). Interpretive guidelines on sexual harassment. Federal Register, 45, 746-777.
11. Fitzgerald, L. F. (1993). Sexual harassment: Violence against women in the workplace. American Psychologist, 48, 1070-1076.
12. Fitzgerald, L. F. & Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152-175.
13. Fitzgerald, L. F., Weitzman, L. M., Gold, Y., & Ormerod, M. (1988). Academic harassment: Sex and denial in scholarly garb. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 239-240.
14. Fortune, M. (1989). Is nothing sacred? When sex invades the pastoral relationship. New York: Harper.
15. Goodwin, M. P. (1989). Sexual harassment: Experiences of university employees. Initiatives: Journal of the National Association for Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors, 52, 25-33.
16. Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
17. Havemann, J. (1988, June 30). 47% of female civil servants report sexual harassment. The Washington Post, p. 1.
18. Hazzard, T. (1989). Sexual harassment: What's good for the goose is good for the gander. ERIC Document No. 310 981.
19. Janus, S. S., & Janus, C. L. (1993). The Janus Report on Sexual Behavior. New York: Wiley & Sons.
20. Jones, P. S. & Remland, M. S. (1992). Sources of variability in perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 27, 121-142.
21. Jordan-Lake, J. (February 10, 1992). Conduct unbecoming a preacher. Christianity Today, 27-30.
22. Kenig, S., & Ryan, J. (1986). Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus. Sex Roles, 15(9/10), 535-549.
23. Konrad, A. M., & Gutek, B. A. (1986). Impact of work experiences on attitudes toward sexual harassment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 422-438.
24. Lebacqz, K. & Barton, R. G. (1991). Sex in the parish. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox.
25. Lott, B., Reilly, M. E., & Howard, D. (1982). Sexual assault and harassment: A campus community case study. Signs, 8, 97-110.
26. Lottes, I. I. (1991). The relationship between nontraditional gender roles and sexual coercion. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 4, 89-109.
27. Margolin, L. (1990). Gender and the stolen kiss: The social support of male and female to violate a partner's sexual consent in a noncoercive situation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 281-291.
28. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58-72.
29. Musialowski, D. M. & Kelley, K. (1987, April). Male rape: Perception of the act and the victim. Paper presented at the Eastern Regional Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Philadelphia, PA.
30. Neuhaus, J. R. (1993). When shepherds go astray. First Things, 29, 55-58.
31. Poppen, P. J., & Segal, N. J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 19, 689-701.
32. Powell, G. N. (1986). Effects of sex role identity and sex on definitions of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 14, 9-19.
33. Rambo, L. (1991a). Interview with Reverend Marie Fortune, August 8, 1990. Pastoral Psychology, 39(5), 305-319.
34. Rambo, L. (1991b). Interview with Dr. Peter Rutter, Author of Sex in the Forbidden Zone, July 27, 1990. Pastoral Psychology, 39(5), 321-334.
35. Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., Caldwell, D., & DeLuca, L. (1992). Tolerance for sexual harassment related to self-reported sexual victimization. Gender and Society, 6(1), 122-138.
36. Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., & Gallogly, S. M. (1986). Sexual harassment of university students. Sex Roles, 15(7/8), 333-358.
37. Rutter, P. (1989). Sex in the forbidden zone. Fawcett Crest, NY: Ballentine Books.
38. Smith, R. E., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101-112.
39. Struckman-Johnson, C. J. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234-240.
40. Struckman-Johnson, D. L., & Struckman-Johnson, C. J. (1991). Men and women's acceptance of coercive sexual strategies varied by initiator gender and couple intimacy. Sex Roles, 25, 661-676.
41. Struckman-Johnson, C. & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1993). College men's and women's reactions to hypothetical sexual touch varied by initiator gender and coercion level. Sex Roles, 29(5/6), 371-385.
42. Tata, J. (1993). The structure and phenomenon of sexual harassment: Impact of category of sexually harassing behavior, gender, and hierarchical level. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 199-211.
43. Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1986). A framework for the study of sexual harassment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 778-793.
44. Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1989). The identification and classification of reactions to sexual harassment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 1-14.
45. Thistlethwaite, S. B. (1991, October 21). Sexual harassment: To protect, empower. Christianity and Crisis, 51, 328-329.
46. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47. Whitely, B. E. (1988). Sex differences in heterosexuals' attitudes toward homosexuals: It depends upon what you ask. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 287-291.
48. Williams, K. B. & Cyr, R. R. (1992). Escalating commitment to a relationship: The sexual harassment trap. Sex Roles, 27(1/2), 47-72.
49. York, K. M. (1989). Defining sexual harassment in work places: A policy capturing approach. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 830-850.