Development of a patient-focused wrist outcome instrument

Hand Clinics

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 437-448

  Bialocerkowski, Andrea E ^a   Grimmer, Karen A ^a   Bain, Gregory I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT FOCUSED OUTCOME INSTRUMENT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VALIDATION PROCESS; WRIST DISEASE;

EID: 0042679541     PISSN: 07490712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-0712(02)00149-X     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Grieco A, Molteni G, de Vito G, Sias N. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders due to biomechanical overload. Ergonomics 1998;41(9):1253-60.
2. Morgan RL, Linder MM. Common wrist injuries. Am Fam Phys 1997;55(3):857-68.
3. McQueen MM. Epidemiology of fractures of the radius and ulna. In: McQueen MM, Jupiter JB, editors. Radius and ulna. Oxford: Butterworth and Heinemann; 1999. p. 1-11.
4. Davis AM, Beaton DE, Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C, Cole D, et al. Measuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure. J Hand Ther 1999;12(4):269-74.
5. Weber ER. Physiologic bases for wrist function. In: Lichtman DM, Alexander AH, editors. The wrist and its disorders. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1997. p. 48-54.
6. Bialocerkowski AE. Difficulties associated with wrist disorders: a qualitative study. Clin Rehab 2002;16(4): 470-81.
7. Hunter JM, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, editors. Rehabilitation of the hand: surgery and therapy. 4th edition. St Louis: Mosby; 1995.
8. Black T. Outcomes: what's all the fuss about? Rehab Nurs 1999;24(5):188-91.
9. Robertson SC, Colborn AR. Outcomes research for rehabilitation: issues and solutions. J Rehabil Outcome Meas 2000;1(5):15-23.
10. Kendall N. Developing outcome assessments: a step by step approach. NZ J Physiother 1997;25(3):11-7.
11. McCartney S, Brown RB. Managing by numbers: using outcome measures in the NHS. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 1999;12(1):6-12.
12. Simmons B, Swiontkowski MF, Evans RW, Amadio PC, Cats-Baril W. Outcomes assessment in the information age: available instruments data collection and utilization of data. Am Acad Ortho Surg Instruct Course Lect 1999;48:667-85.
13. Hammond R. Evaluating physiotherapy by measuring the outcome. Physiother 2000;86(4):170-2.
14. Stineman MG. Defining populations, treatments, and outcomes of interest: reconciling the rules of biology and meaningfulness. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2001;80(2):147-59.
15. Bialocerkowski AE, Grimmer KA, Bain GI. A systematic review of the content and quality of wrist outcome instruments. Int J Qual Health Care 2000; 12(2):149-57.
16. Wright JG, Young NL. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(3):239-46.
17. Beaton DE, Richards RR. Measuring function of the shoulder: a cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78A(6):882-90.
18. Pape TL-B, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meaning assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(1/2/3):5-20.
19. McQueen M, Caspers J. Colles fracture: does the anatomical result affect the final function? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70B(4):649-51.
20. Gray J. Discussion of the ICIDH-2 in relation to occupational therapy and occupational science. Scand J Occup Ther 2001;8(1):19-30.
21. Young NL, Williams JI, Yoshida KK, Bombardier C, Wright JG. The context of measuring disability: does it matter whether capacity or performance is measured? J Clin Epidemiol 1996;9(10):1079-101.
22. Toedtler LJ, Lasker JN, Campbell DT. The comparison group problem in bereavement studies and the retrospective pretest. Eval Rev 1990;14(1):75-90.
23. Herrmann D. Reporting current past and changed health status: what we know about distortion. Med Care 1995;33(4):AS89-94.
24. Wilson IB. Clinical understanding and clinical implications of response shift. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48(11):1577-88.
25. Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Leng M, Russel IT, McDonald LM. A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: the patient-generated index. Med Care 1994;32(11):1109-26.
26. Wright JG, Rudicel S, Feinstein AR. Asking patients what they want: evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76B(2):229-34.
27. O'Boyle CA, McGee H, Hickey A, O'Malley K, Joyce CRB. Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. Lancet 1992;339(8801): 1088-91.
28. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Reliability. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR, editors. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 104-27.
29. Guggenmoos-Holzman I. The meaning of Kappa: probabilistic concepts of reliability and validity revisited. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49(7):775-82.
30. Rigby AS. Statistical methods in epidemiology. V. Towards an understanding of the kappa coefficient. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22(8):339-44.
31. Indrayan A, Sarmukaddam SB. Relationship and agreement. In: Indrayan A, Sarmukaddam SB, editors. Medical biostatistics. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2001. p. 512-43.
32. Kane RL. Looking for physical therapy outcomes. Phys Ther 1994;74(5):425-9.
33. Marx RG, Bombardier C, Hogg-Johnson S, Wright JG. How should importance and severity ratings be combined for item reduction in the development of health status instruments? J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52(3):193-7.