Hemodynamics induced after acute reduction of proximal thoracic aorta compliance

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 195-204

  Ioannou, C V ^a,b   Stergiopulos, N ^b   Katsamouris, A N ^a   Startchik, I ^c   Kalangos, A ^c   Licker, M J ^c   Westerhof, N ^d   Morel, D R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF HERAKLION   (Greece)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

^c GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arterial compliance; Arterial impedance; Compliance mismatch; Hypertension; Synthetic grafts; Vascular prosthesis

Indexed keywords

AORTA ARCH; AORTA PROSTHESIS; AORTA SURGERY; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; BLOOD VESSEL COMPLIANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMICS; IMPEDANCE; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NONHUMAN; POLITEF IMPLANT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; RECORDING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; THORACIC AORTA;

EID: 0042668585     PISSN: 10785884     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1917     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Guyton AC. Cardiac output, venous return, and their regulation. In: Guyton AC, ed., Textbook of Medical Physiology, 8th ed., Philadelphia: Saunders, 1991; 222-233.
2. Kinely CE, Marble AE. Compliance: a continuing problem with vascular grafts. J Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 21: 163-170.
3. Morita S, Kuboyama I, Asou T et al. The effect of extraantomic bypass on aortic impedance studied in open chest dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 102: 774-783.
4. Morita S, Asou T, Kuboyama I, Harasawa Y, Sunagawa K, Yasui H. Inelastic vascular prosthesis for proximal aorta increases pulsatile arterial load and causes left ventricular hypertrophy in dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 12: 768-774.
5. Bauernschmitt R, Schulz S, Schwarzhaupt A et al. Simulation of arterial hemodunamics after partial prosthetic replacement of the aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 676-682.
6. Quaglini V, Villa T, Migliavacca F et al. An in vivo methodology for evaluating the mechanical properties of aortic vascular prostheses. Artif Organs 2002; 26: 555-564.
7. Ballyk PD, Walsh C, Butany J, Ojha M. Compliance mismatch may promote graft-artery intimal hyperplasia by altering suture-line stresses. J Biomech 1998; 31: 229-237.
8. Maeta H, Hori M. Effects of a lack of Aortic Windkessel properties on the left ventricle. Jpn Circ J 1985; 49: 232-237.
9. Mitsui T, Maeta H, Fukuda I et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy due to aortic bypass grafting with a long prosthesis. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1986; 27: 201-206.
10. Kobayashi S, Yano M, Kohno M et al. Influence of aortic impedance on the development of pressure-overload left ventricle hypertrophy in rats. Circulation 1996; 94: 3362-3368.
11. Kass DA, Saeki A, Tunin RS, Recchia FA. Adverse influence of systemic vascular stiffening on cardiac dysfunction and adaptation to acute coronary occlusion. Circulation 1996; 93: 1533-1541.
12. Stergiopulos N, Young DF, Rogge TR. Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and arterial stenosis. J Biomech 1992; 25: 1477-1488.
13. Stergiopulos N, Segers P, Westerhof N. Use of the pulse pressure method for estimating total arterial compliance in vivo. Am J Physiol 1999; 276: H424-H428.
14. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries. 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold; 1990.
15. Greenwald SE, Berry CL. Improving vascular grafts: the importance of mechanical and hemodynamic properties. J Pathol 2000; 190: 292-299.
16. Westerhof N, Sipkema P, van den Bos GC, Elzinga G. Forward and backward waves in the arterial system. Cardiovasc Res 1972; 6: 648-656.
17. Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA. Aortic impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms. Circulation 1980; 62: 105-116.
18. Kim SY, Hinkamp TJ, Jacobs WR, Lichtenberg RC, Posniak H, Pifarr R. Effect of an inelastic aortic synthetic vascular graft on exercise hemodynamics. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 981-989.
19. O'Rourke MF. Steady and pulsatile energy loses in the systemic circulation under normal conditions and in simulated arterial disease. Circ Res 1962; 1: 313-326.
20. Randall OS, Van den Bos GC, Westerhof N. Systemic compliance: does it play a role in the genesis of essential hypertension. Cardiovasc Res 1984; 18: 455-462.
21. Kelly RP, Tunin RS, Kass DA. Effect of reduced aortic compliance on cardiac efficiency and contractile function of in situ canine left ventricle. Circ Res 1992; 71: 490-502.
22. Leuprecht A, Perktold K, Prosi M, Berk T, Trubel W, Schima H. Numerical study of hemodynamics and wall mechanics in distal end-to-side anastomoses in bypass grafts. J Biomech 2002; 35: 225-236.
23. Okuhn SP, Connelly DP, Calakos N, Ferrell L, Man-Xiang P, Goldstone J. Does compliance mismatch alone cause neointimal hyperplasia? J Vasc Surg 1989; 9: 35-45.
24. Pouler H, Covell JW, Ross J. Effect of alteration in aortic input impedance on the force-velocity-length relationship in the intact canine heart. Circ Res 1979; 20: 26-35.
25. Cheng KS, Baker CR, Hamilton G, Hoeks APG, Seifalian AM. Arterial elastic properties and cardiovascular risk/event. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 24: 383-397. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1756.
26. Baird RN, Kidson IG, L'Italien GJ, Abbott WM. Dynamic compliance of arterial grafts. Am J Physiol 1977; 233: H568-H572.
27. Elzinga G, Westerhof N. Pressure and flow generated by the left ventricle against different impedances. Circ Res 1973; 32: 178-186.
28. Stergiopulos N, Meister JJ, Westerhof N. Determinants of stroke volume and systolic and diastolic pressure. Am J Physiol 1996; 270: H2050-H2059.
29. Segers P, Steendijk, Stergiopulos N, Westerhof N. Predicting systolic and diastolic aortic blood pressure and stroke volume in the intact sheep. J Biomech 2001; 34: 41-50.
30. Lakatta EG. Cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms in advanced age. Physiol Rev 1993; 3: 413-467.