Responsiveness of the index of mobility limitation: Comparison with gait speed alone in the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam

Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 721-727

  Lan, Tzuo Yun ^a   Deeg, Dorly J H ^b   Guralnik, Jack M ^c   Melzer, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Demography and Biometry   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DETERIORATION; EXPIRATORY FLOW RATE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GAIT; GAIT DISORDER; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LUNG FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT MOBILITY; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; VALIDATION PROCESS; WALKING SPEED;

EID: 0042664143     PISSN: 10795006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/58.8.m721     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lan TY, Melzer D, Tom BD, Guralnik JM. Performance tests and disability: developing an objective index of mobility-related limitation in older populations. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2002;57A:M294-M301.
2. Fried LP, Ettinger WH, Lind B, Newman AB, Gardin J. Physical disability in older adults: a physiological approach. Cardiovascular Health Study Research Group. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:747-760.
3. Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Kasper JD, Guralnik JM. Association of comorbidity with disability in older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:27-37.
4. Fried LP, Guralnik JM. Disability in older adults: evidence regarding significance, etiology, and risk. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:92-100.
5. Hoeymans N, Wouters ER, Feskens EJ, van den Bos GA, Kromhout D. Reproducibility of performance-based and self-reported measures of functional status. J Gerontol Med Sci. 1997;52A:M363-M368.
6. Jette AM, Jette DU, Ng J, Plotkin DJ, Bach MA. Are performance-based measures sufficiently reliable for use in multicenter trials? Musculoskeletal Impairment (MSI) Study Group. J Gerontol Med Sci. 1999;54A:M3-M6.
7. Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Higgins J, Ahmed S, Finch LE, Richards CL. Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1204-1212.
8. Platz T, Prass K, Denzler P, Bock S, Mauritz KH. Testing a motor performance series and a kinematic motion analysis as measures of performance in high-functioning stroke patients: reliability, validity, and responsiveness to therapeutic intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:270-277.
9. Shields RK, Enloe LJ, Evans RE, Smith KB, Steckel SD. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of functional tests in patients with total joint replacement. Phys Ther. 1995;75:169-176.
10. King MB, Judge JO, Whipple R, Wolfson L. Reliability and responsiveness of two physical performance measures examined in the context of a functional training intervention. Phys Ther. 2000;80:8-16.
11. van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66:480-484.
12. Steultjens MP, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW. Responsiveness of observational and self-report methods for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45:56-61.
13. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2000;55A:M221-M231.
14. Shinkai S, Watanabe S, Kumagai S, et al. Walking speed as a good predictor for the onset of functional dependence in a Japanese rural community population. Age Ageing. 2000;29:441-446.
15. Knipscheer CPM, de Jong Gierveld J, van Tilburg TG, Dykstra PA. Living Arrangements and Social Networks of Older Adults. Amsterdam: VU University Press; 1995.
16. Broese van Groenou MI, van Tilburg TG, de Leeuw ED, Liefbroer AC. Data collection. In: Knipscheer CPM, de Jong Gierveld J, van Tilburg TG, Dykstra PA, eds. Living Arrangements and Social Networks of Older Adults in the Netherlands. First Results. Amsterdam: VU University Press; 1995: 185-197.
17. Aartsen MJ, Smits CH, van Tilburg T, Knipscheer KC, Deeg DJ. Activity in older adults: cause or consequence of cognitive functioning? A longitudinal study on everyday activities and cognitive performance in older adults. J Gerontol Psychol Sci. 2002;57B:P153-P162.
18. Deeg DJ, van Tilburg T, Smit JH, de Leeuw ED. Attrition in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. The effect of differential inclusion in side studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:319-328.
19. Deeg DJH, Westendorp-de Seriere M. Autonomy and Well-Being in the Aging Population I. Report from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam 1992-1993. Amsterdam: VU University Press; 1994.
20. Deeg DJH, Beekman ATF, Kriegsman DMW, Westendorp-de Seriere M. Autonomy and Well-Being in the Aging Population II. Report from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam 1992-1996. Amsterdam: VU University Press; 1999.
21. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol Med Sci. 1994;49:M85-M94.
22. National Institute on Aging (NIA), MacArthur Foundation, and EPH. Assessing Physical Performance in the Home-Part 1 & Part 2. New Haven, CT: Biomedical Communications, Yale University School of Medicine; 1988.
23. Cook NR, Evans DA, Scherr PA, et al. Peak expiratory flow rate in an elderly population. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;130:66-78.
24. Cook NR, Evans DA, Scherr PA, Speizer FE, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Peak expiratory flow rate and 5-year mortality in an elderly population. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:784-794.
25. The Epidemiology for Policy Group, Department of Public Health & Primary Care University of Cambridge. MOBLI index. Accessed 2002 at: www.phpc.cam.ac.uk/epg/mobli.htm
26. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:459-468.
27. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:171-178.
28. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990;28:632-642.
29. Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:79-93.
30. Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:869-879.
31. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Russell IT. SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions. Qual Health Care. 1994;3:186-192.
32. Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:1369-1378.
33. Onder G, Penninx BW, Lapuerta P, et al. Change in physical performance over time in older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2002;57A:M289-M293.
34. Iburg K, Salomon J, Tandon A, Murray CJL. Cross-Population Comparability of Self-Reported and Physician-Assessed Mobility Levels: Evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Series No. 14. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.