The natural appearance of unnatural incline speed

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 816-826

  Rohrer, Doug ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATION; PERCEPTION; VELOCITY;

EID: 0042662593     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196119     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ANTON, H, (1980). Calculus with analytic geometry (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
2. BERTAMINI, M. (1993). Memory for position and dynamic representations. Memory & Cognition, 21, 449-457.
3. BHALLA, M., & PROFFITT, D. R. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1076-1096.
4. CARAMAZZA, A., MCCLOSKEY, M., & GREEN, B. (1981). Naive beliefs in "sophisticated" subjects: Misconceptions about trajectories of objects. Cognition, 9, 117-123.
5. CATRAMBONE, R., JONES, C. M., JONIDES, J., & SEIFERT, C. (1995). Reasoning about curvilinear motion: Using principles or analogy. Memory & Cognition, 23, 368-373.
6. CRAWFORD, F. S. (1996). Rolling and slipping down Galileo's plane: Rhythm of the spheres. American Journal of Physics, 64, 541-546.
7. CREEM, S. H., & PROFFITT, D. R. (1998). Two memories for geographical slant: Separation and interdependence of action and awareness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 22-36.
8. DRAKE, S. (1989). Galileo's gravitational units. The Physics Teacher, 27, 432-436.
9. HALLIDAY, D., & RESNICK, R. (1981). Fundamentals of physics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
10. HECHT, H., & BERTAMINI, M. (2000). Understanding projectile acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 730-746.
11. HUBBARD, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2; 322-338.
12. HUBBARD, T. L. (1998). Representational momentum and other displacements in memory as evidence for nonconscious knowledge of physical principles. In S. R. Hameroff, A. W. Kaszniak, & A. C. Scott (Eds.), Toward a science of consciousness II: The second Tucson discussions and debates (pp. 505-512). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. KAISER, M. K., JONIDES, J., & ALEXANDER, J. (1986). Intuitive reasoning about abstract and familiar physics problems. Memory & Cognition, 14, 308-312.
14. KAISER, M. K., MCCLOSKEY, M., & PROFFITT, D. R. (1986). Development of intuitive theories of motion: Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces. Developmental Psychology, 22, 67-71.
15. KAISER, M. K., PROFFITT, D. R., & ANDERSON, K. (1985). Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 795-803.
16. KAISER, M. K., PROFFITT, D. R., WHELAN, S. M., & HECHT, H. (1992). Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 669-689.
17. KOZHEVNIKOV, M., & HEGARTY, M. (2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuristics between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 439-453.
18. MCCLOSKEY, M., CARAMAZZA, A., & GREEN, B. (1980). Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion of objects. Science, 210, 1139-1141.
19. MCCLOSKEY, M., & KOHL, D. (1983). Naive physics: The curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 146-156.
20. MCCLOSKEY, M., WASHBURN, A., & FELCH, L. (1983). Intuitive physics: The straight-down belief and its origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 636-649.
21. PROFFITT, D. R., BHALLA, M., GOSSWEILER, R., & MIDGETT, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409-428.
22. PROFFITT, D. R., CREEM, S. H., & ZOSH, W. D. (2001). Seeing mountains in mole hills: Geographical-slant perception. Psychological Science, 12, 418-423.
23. ROHRER, D. (1994). More thought provokers. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
24. ROHRER, D. (2002). Misconceptions about incline speed for nonlinear slopes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 963-973.