The ten test revisited

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 593-594

  Strauch, Berish ^a   Lang, Ann ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SENSORY NERVE; SENSORY RECEPTOR; SHORT SURVEY; SPINAL CORD; TEN TEST; VALIDATION PROCESS;

HAND; HUMANS; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOUCH;

EID: 0042631362     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000070680.25190.E6     Document Type: Short Survey

References (4)

1. Strauch, B., Lang, A., Ferder, M., Keyes-Ford, M., Freeman, K., and Newstein, D. The ten test. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 99: 1074, 1997.
2. Patel, M. R., and Bassini, L. A comparison of five tests for determining hand sensibility. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 15: 523, 1999.
3. Aszmann, O. C., and Dellon, A. L. Relationship between cutaneous pressure threshold and two-point discrimination. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 14: 417, 1998.
4. Faught, B. E., and McKee, N. H. Establishing a positivity criterion in determining the utility of the ten test in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (Abstract). J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 18: 634, 2002.