A channel-by-channel method of reducing the errors associated with peak area integration

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment

Volumn 372, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 283-288

  Luedeke, Thomas P ^a   Tripard, Gerald E ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CURVE FITTING; ESTIMATION; INSTRUMENT ERRORS; INTERPOLATION; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; PROBABILITY;

PEAK AREA INTEGRATION; UNCERTAINTY;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 0042630918     PISSN: 01689002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(95)01298-2     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. M. Czauderna, J. Radioanal. Chem. 129 (1989) 103.
2. L. Loska, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 39 (1988) 475.
3. H.R. Ralston and G.E. Wilcox, Modern trends in activation analysis, ed. J.R. Devoe (NBS Special Publication 312, Washington, 1969) p. 1238.
4. H.P. Yule, Anal. Chem. 40 (1968) 1480.
5. D.F. Covell, Anal. Chem. 31 (1959) 1785.
6. S. Sterlinski, Anal. Chem. 42 (1970) 151.
7. P. Quittner, Anal. Chem. 41 (1969) 1504.
8. P.A. Baedecker, Anal. Chem. 43 (1971) 405.
9. L.A. Smakhtin, J. Radioanal. Chem. 99 (1986) 171.
10. G. Kennedy, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 299 (1990) 349.
11. P.R. Bevington, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (McGraw-Hill, 1969) p. 73.
12. Genie-PC v2.1, Canberra Industries, 800 Research Parkway, Meriden, CT 06450 (1994).