Quality of fisheries data and uncertainty in stock assessment

Scientia Marina

Volumn 67, Issue SUPPL 1, 2003, Pages 75-87

  Chen, Yong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Atypical error; Biased error; Data quality; Robust Bayesian inference; Stock assessment; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

DATA QUALITY; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; STOCK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0042628050     PISSN: 02148358     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3989/scimar.2003.67s175     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chen, Y. and D. Fournier. - 1999. Impacts of atypical data on Bayesian inference and robust Bayesian approach in fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 1525-1533
2. Chen, Y., P. Breen, and N. Andrew. - 2000. Impacts of outliers and mis-specification of priors on Bayesian fisheries stock assessment. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: 2293-2305
3. Hilborn, R. and C. Walters. - 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics, and uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, New York.
4. Hinrichsen, R.A. - 2001. The importance of influence diagnostics: examples from Snake River Chinook salmon spawner-recruit models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 551-559
5. Megrey, B.A. - 1989. Review and comparison of age-structured stock assessment models from theoretical and applied points of view. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 6: 8-48.
6. McAllister, M.K. and G.P. Kirkwood. - 1998. Using Bayesian decision analysis to help achieve a precautionary approach for managing developing fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 2642-2661.
7. Montgomery, S. - 1995. Patterns in landings and size composition of Jasus verreauxi in waters off New South Wales, Australia. Crustaceana 68: 257-266.
8. Montgomery, S., J. Craig, M. Tanner, and Y. Chen. - 1997. An assessment of the NSW eastern rock lobster fishery for 1996/97. NSW Fisheries Research Institute Stock Assessment Report.
9. NRC (National Research Council). - 1997. Improving fish stock assessments. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
10. NRC (National Research Council). - 1999. Sustaining marine fisheries. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
11. Pikitch, E.K. - 1987. Use of a mixed-species yield-per-recruit model to explore the consequences of various management policies for the Oregon flatfish fishery. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44(suppl. 2): 349-359.
12. Polacheck, T., R. Hilborn, and A. E. Punt. - 1993. Fitting surplus production models: comparing methods and measuring uncertainty. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 2597-2607.
13. Rousseeuw, P.J. and A.M. Leroy. - 1987. Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, New York.
14. Rubin, D.B. - 1988. Using the SIR algorithm to simulate posterior distributions. In Bayesian Statistics 3. Edited by J. M. Bernardo, M. H. de Groot, D. V. Lindley, and A. Smith. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK pp. 395-402.
15. Schnute, J. - 1989. The influence of statistical error on stock assessment: illustrations from Schaefer's model. In Effects of ocean variability on recruitment and an evaluation of parameters used in stock assessment models. Edited by R. J. Beamish and G. A. McFarlane. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 108: 101-109.
16. Smith, A.F.M. and A.E. Gelfand - 1992. Bayesian statistics without tears: a sampling-resampling perspective. Am. Stat. 46: 84-88.
17. Walters, C.J. - 1998. Evaluation of quota management policies for developing fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 2691-2705.