An emergent audit agenda: Comparative lessons drawn from best value development in local government in Scotland compared with England

Public Policy and Administration

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 67-89

  Sheffield, James ^a   Bowerman, Mary ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042626720     PISSN: 09520767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/095207679901400305     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Accounts Commission for Scotland (1997a), Management module one.
2. Accounts Commission for Scotland (1997b), Management module two.
3. Accounts Commission for Scotland (1998a), Proposals for the 1998 direction. A consultation document for the 1999/2000 statutory performance indicators.
4. Accounts Commission for Scotland (1998b), Assess yourself. Using self assessment for performance improvement, by D. Difford, the Management Studies Unit.
5. Accounts Commission for Scotland (1998c), The measures of success: developing a balanced scorecard approach.
6. Accounts Commission for Scotland (1998d), Planning for success: a review of the audit of management arrangements in Scottish Councils.
7. Accounts Commission for Scotland (1999a), Getting to know you. Building and using an information portfolio - a guide for service managers.
8. Accounts Commission for Scotland (1999b), Measuring up to the best. A manager's guide to benchmarking.
9. Asquith, A. (1998), Non-elite employees' perceptions of organisational change in English local government, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol.11(4), pp.262-280.
10. Asser, M. and J. Haines (1995), A quest for the best strategic management of a countrywide quality initiative, International Journal of Public Sector Man, Vol.8(7), pp.6-14.
11. Ball, R. and C. Monaghan (1996), Performance review: the British experience, Local Government Studies, Vol.22(1), pp.40-58.
12. Blundell, B. and A. Murdock (1997), Managing in the public sector, (Institute of management foundation. Published by Butterworth Heinneman).
13. Bogason, P. (1998), Changes in the Scandinavian model. From Bureaucratic command to interorganisational negotiation, Public Administration, Vol. 76, Summer, pp.335-354.
14. Bowerman, M. (1996), The rise and fall of value for money auditing, in Accounting and performance measurement: issues in the private and public sectors, edited by I. Lapsley and F. Mitchell, (Paul Chapman Publishing).
15. Boyne, G. (1997), Comparing the performance of local authorities: an evaluation of the Audit Commission indicators, Local Government Studies, Vol.23(4), pp.17-43.
16. Carter, N. (1994), "Performance indicators: 'Backseat driving' or 'hands off control", in Public sector management: theory, critique and practice, edited by D. McKevitt and A. Lawton, (published by the Open University and Sage press).
17. Chartered Institute of Public Finance and accountancy (1996), Benchmarking to improve performance.
18. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998a), Modernising local government: improving local services through best value, March, [Consultation paper]. (The Stationery Office).
19. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998b), Modernising local government: in touch with the people, (The Stationery Office).
20. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998c), Modernising local government: enhancing public participation in local government, (The Stationery Office).
21. Donnelly, M., M. Wisniewski, J. Dalrymple and A. Curry (1995), Measuring service quality in local government: the SERVQUAL approach, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol.8(7), pp.15-20.
22. Fee, R., P. Maxwell and A. Erridge (1998), Contracting for Services - a Double Jeopardy? An Analysis of Contract Compliance in the Context of European and UK Social and Public Procurement Policy, Public Policy and Administration, Vol.13(l), pp.79-94.
23. Flynn, N. (1995), The future of public sector management: Are there some lessons from Europe?, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol.8(4), pp.59-67.
24. Freeman-Bell, G. and R. Grover (1994), The use of Quality management in Local authorities, Local Government Studies, Vol. 20(4), pp.554-569.
25. Gaster, L. (1992), Quality, decentralisation and devolution, in Management of quality in local government, edited by I. Sanderson, (Longman).
26. Greer, A. and P. Hoggett (1997), Patterns of governance in local public spending bodies, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol.10(3), pp.214-227.
27. Handy, C. (1990), Inside Organisations, (Penguin).
28. Handy, C. (1994), Understanding organisations, 4th edition, (Penguin).
29. Hartley, J. (1998), Organisation wide approaches to Best Value, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Warwick/DETR Best Value Series paper 10. www.local.detr.gov.uk/research/bestva-1/paperlO/index.htm.
30. H.M. Government (1980), Local Government Planning and Land Act, (The Stationery Office).
31. H.M. Government (1988), Local Government Act, (The Stationery Office).
32. H.M. Government (1992), Local Government Act, (The Stationery Office).
33. H.M. Government (1994), Local Government (Scotland) Act, (The Stationery Office).
34. Hopwood, A. (1994), Accounting and the pursuit of efficiency, in Public sector management: theory, critique and practice, edited by D. McKevitt and A. Lawton, (The Open University and Sage press).
35. Jackson, P. (1993), Public Sector Performance evaluation, Public Money and Management, Vol.13(4), pp.11-15.
36. Kanter, R.M. and D.V. Summers (1994), Doing well while doing good: dilemmas of performance measurement in nonprofit organisations and the need for a multiple constituency approach, in Public sector management: theory, critique and practice, edited by D. McKevitt and A. Lawton, (The Open University and Sage press).
37. Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton (1996a), Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system, Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb, pp.75-85.
38. Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton (1996b), Linking the balanced scorecard to Strategy. California Management Review, vol.39(1), pp.53-79.
39. Labour Party (1997), Election Manifesto.
40. McKevitt, D. and A. Lawton, The manager, the citizen, the politician and performance measures, Public Money and Management, Vol. 16(3), pp.49-54.
41. Payne, H. and H. Potter (1994), Quality reviews in the London Borough of Hackney Local Government Studies, Vol.20(1), pp.16-23.
42. Peters, T.J. and R.H. Waterman (1982), In search of excellence, (Harper & Row).
43. Potter, J. (1994), Consumerism and the public sector: how well does the coat fit?, in Public sector management: theory, critique and practice, edited by D. McKevitt and A. Lawton, (The Open University and Sage press).
44. Public Finance (1997), 19th December, p.17-17.
45. Public Finance (1998a), 16th January.
46. Public Finance (1998b), 27th February.
47. Public Finance (1998c), 13th March, pp.12-13.
48. Reeves, E. (1995), Privatising local authority service in Ireland: lessons from experience, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol.8(4), pp.48-58.
49. Rouse, J. (1994), Resource and performance management in public service organisations, in Management in the Public sector - challenge and change, edited by K. Issac-Henry, C. Painter, and C. Barnes, 2nd edition, (International Thomson Business Press).
50. Sanderson, I. (1992a), Defining quality in local government, in Management of quality in local government, edited by I. Sanderson, (Longman).
51. Sanderson, I. (1992b), Quality, strategic planning and performance review, in Management of quality in local government, edited by I. Sanderson, (Longman).
52. Sanderson, I. (1999), Achieving Best Value through Performance Review, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. Warwick/DETR Best Value Series paper 5. www.local.detr.gov.uklresearch/bestva-l/paper5/index.htm.
53. Schrijver, H.W.N. and A.H. Vermeulen (1996), Management development in a Dutch Ministry: Getting things started, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol.9(2), pp.52-56.
54. Scottish Office (1997a), Department for Development, Circular 16/97, Statutory instruments deferring CCT.
55. Scottish Office (1997b), Department for Development, Circular 22/97, Best Value 1st Best Value task Force report.
56. Scottish Office (1998a), Department for Development, Circular 12/98, Best Value - the 2nd Best Value task force report.
57. Scottish Office (1998b), Department for Development, Circular 26/1998, Best Value - Key performance indicators.
58. Scottish Office (1998c) A new ethical framework for local government in Scotland - a consultation paper, (The Stationery Office).
59. Scottish Office (1998d), The commission on Local Government and the Scottish Parliament Consultation paper 1, (The Stationery Office).
60. Scottish Office (1998e), The commission on Local Government and the Scottish Parliament Consultation paper 2, (The Stationery Office).
61. Severijnen, P. (1994), Local authorities and Market research: Market research incorporated in the policy process of consumer oriented local authorities, in Local Government Studies, Vol.20(1).
62. Tichelar, M. (1998), Evaluating performance indicators: Current trends in local government, in Local Government Studies, Vol. 24(3), pp.29-35.
63. van Helden, G.J. (1998), 'A review of the "policy and management instruments" project for municipalities in the Netherlands', Financial Accountability and Management, Vol.14(2), pp.85-104.
64. van Helden, G.J. and H.J. ter Bogt (1998), 'The application of business like planning and control in local government', A comparative study of eight Dutch municipalities, European Institute of Advanced Studies in Management, Accounting for the New Public Management, Venice Conference, September.