Assessment of salt tolerance in eucalypts using chlorophyll fluorescence attributes

New Forests

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 233-246

  Corney, Helen J ^a   Sasse, Jenneth M ^a   Ades, Peter K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Eucalyptus camaldulensis; Plant health; Propagules; Screening

Indexed keywords

CLONING; FLUORESCENCE; QUENCHING; SALINITY MEASUREMENT; SALTS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

SALT STRESS;

CHLOROPHYLL;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; CHLOROPHYLL; FLUORESCENCE; SALINITY TOLERANCE;

EUCALYPTUS CAMALDULENSIS; EUCALYPTUS GRANDIS; EUCALYPTUS UROPHYLLA;

EID: 0042626508     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024474813116     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Belkhodja R., Morales R.F., Abadia A., Gomez-Aparisi J. and Abadia J. 1994. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a possible tool for salinity tolerance screening in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Physiol. 104: 667-673.
2. Bigras F.J. 2000. Selection of white spruce families in the context of climate change: heat tolerance. Tree Physiol. 20: 1227-1234.
3. Dale G. 2000. Forests on saline land becoming a reality. Agroforestry News 9: 4-5.
4. Dionisio-Sese M.L. and Tobita S. 2000. Effects of salinity on sodium content and photosynthetic responses of rice seedlings differing in salt tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 157: 54-58.
5. Doran J.C. 1995. Non-wood forest products from plantations of Australian trees. In: Eldrige K.G., Crowe M.P. and Old K.M. (eds), Environmental Management: the Role of Eucalypts and Other Fast Growing Species. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp. 161-166.
6. Ghassemi F., Jakeman A.J. and Baker N.R. 1995. Salinisation of land and water resources Human causes, extent, management and case studies. UNSW Press, Sydney, 526 p.
7. Gill H.S. and Abrol I.P. 1991. Salt affected soils, their afforestation and its ameliorating influence. Internat. Tree Crops J. 6: 239-260.
8. Jiminez M.S., Gonzalez-Rodriguez A.M., Morales D., Cid M.C., Socorro A.R. and Caballero M. 1997. Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool for salt stress detection in roses. Photosynthetica 33: 291-301.
9. Kanowski P.J. 1995. Eucalypts: their domestication and role as plantation species. In: Eldrige K.G., Crowe M.P. and Old K.M. (eds). Environmental Management: the Role of Eucalypts and Other Fast Growing Species. CSIRO Publishing. Melbourne. pp. 1-3.
10. Keiper F.J., Chen D.M. and De Filippis L.F. 1998. Respiratory, photosynthetic and ultrastructural changes accompanying salt adaptation in culture of Eucalyptus microcorys. J. Plant Physiol. 152: 564-573.
11. Krause G, and Weis E. 1991. chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 33-49.
12. Lambert M.J. and Turner J. 2000. Commercial forest plantations on saline lands. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. 198 p.
13. Lazar D and Naus J. 1998. Statistical properties of chlorophyll fluorescence induction parameters. Photosynthetica 35: 121-127.
14. Lichtenthaler H.K. 1988. In vivo chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool for stress detection in plants. In: Lichtenthaler H.K. (ed.). Applications of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Photosynthesis Research, Stress Physiology, Hydrobiology and Remote Sensing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 129-142.
15. Lichtenthaler H.K. and Rinderle U. 1988. The role of chlorophyll fluorescence in the detection of stress conditions in plaints. CRC Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 19: 29-85.
16. Lutts S., Kinet J.M. and Bouharmont J. 1996. NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Ann. Bot. 78: 389-398.
17. Marcar N.E. 1995. Eucalypts for salt-affected and acid soils. In: Eldrige K.G., Crowe M.P. and Old K.M. (eds). Environmental Management: the Role of Eucalypts and Other Fast Growing Species. CSIRO Publishing. Melbourne. pp. 90-99.
18. Maxwell K. and Johnson G.N. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 659-668.
19. McWilliam J.R. 1986. The national and international importance of drought and salinity effects on agricultural production. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13: 1-13.
20. Munns R., Schachtman D.P. and Condon A.G. 1995. The significance of a two-phase growth response to salinity in wheat and barley. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22: 561-569.
21. Ouerghi Z., Cornic G., Roudani M., Ayadi A, and Brulfert J. 2000. Effect of NaCl on photosynthesis of two wheat species (Triticum durum and T. aestivum) differing in their sensitivity to salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 156: 335-340.
22. Sands R. 1981. Salt resistance in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. from three different seed sources. Aust. For. Res. 11: 93-100.
23. Sasse J.M. and Corney H.J. 2000. Monitoring the effects of brassinosteroids on salt-stressed eucalypts using chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Proc. Plant Growth Reg. Soc. Amer. 27: 150-154.
24. Sasse J.M. and Sands R. 1996. Comparative responses of cuttings and seedlings of Eucalyptus globulus to water stress. Tree Physiol. 16: 287-294.
25. Sasse J.M. and Sands R. 1997. Configuration and development of root systems of cuttings and seedlings of Eucalyptus globulus. New Forests 14: 85-105.
26. Schreiber U. and Bilger W. 1993. Progress in chlorophyll fluorescence research: major developments during the past years in retrospect. Prog. Bot. 54: 151-173.
27. + accumulation, and chlorophyll fluorescence of corn leaves: a comparison survey and prospects for screening. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 25: 609-616.
28. Thomson L.A.J., Morris J.D. and Halloran G., Indian Soc. Soil Sci., Karnal, India 1987. Salt tolerance in eucalypts. In: Rana R.S. (ed.). Proc. Internat. Symp. on Afforestation of Salt-affected Soils. 3: Assessment and Results., pp. 1-12.
29. Zobel B.J. and Talbert T.J. 1984. Applied Forest Tree Improvement. John Wiley and Sons. Inc., New York. 505 p.