Deconvolution algorithm based on automatic cutoff frequency selection for EPR imaging

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 444-448

  Deng, Yuanmu ^a   He, Guanglong ^a   Kuppusamy, Periannan ^a   Zweier, Jay L ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cutoff frequency; Deconvolution; EPRI; Fourier transform; Image reconstruction

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CUTOFF FREQUENCY; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE RESOLUTION; PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE;

AUTOMATIC ALGORITHMS; DECONVOLUTION ALGORITHM; EFFECTIVE ALGORITHMS; ELECTRON PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; EPRI; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; FOURIER AMPLITUDE SPECTRA; FREQUENCY SELECTION;

DECONVOLUTION;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PARAMETER; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 0042592948     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10533     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Berliner LJ, Fujii H, Wan XM, Lukiewicz SJ. Feasibility study of imaging a living murine tumor by electron paramagnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1987;4:380-384.
2. Ewert U, Herrling T. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Modern Methods of Radiospectroscopy, Reinhardsbrunn, German Democratic Republic, 1985. p 34-47.
3. Ohno K. ESR imaging: a deconvolution method for hyperfine patterns. J Magn Reson 1982;50:145-150.
4. Fujii H, Berliner LJ. One- and two-dimensional EPR imaging studies on phantoms and plant specimens. Magn Reson Med 1985;2:275-282.
5. Sotgiu A, Gazzillo D, Momo F. ESR imaging: spatial deconvolution in the presence of an asymmertic hyperfine structure. J Phys C: Solid State Phys 1987;20:1297-6304.
6. Eaton SS, Eaton GR, Ohno K. EPR imaging and in vivo EPR. Boca Raton: CRC Press: 1991.
7. Madden FN, Godfrey KR, Chappell MJ, Hovorka R, Bates RA. A comparison of six deconvolution techniques. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1996;24:283-299.
8. Goez M, Heun R. Reference deconvolution in the frequency domain. J Magn Reson 1999;136:69-75.
9. Jain AK. Fundamentals of digital image processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1989.
10. Candy JV. Signal processing: the modern approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1988.
11. Fujii H, Berliner LJ. Application of the convolution difference method in reconstruction techniques in EPR imaging. J Magn Reson 1986;68:377-382.
12. Ewert U, Thiessenhusen KU. Deconvolution for the stationary-gradient method. In: Eaton GR, Eaton SS, Ohno K, editors, EPR imaging and in vivo EPR. Boca Raton: CRC Press: 1991. p 119-126.
13. Momo F, Colacicchi S, Sotgiu A. Limits of deconvolution in enhancing the resolution in EPR imaging experiments. Meas Sci Technol 1992:60-64.
14. Kuppusamy P, Chzhan M, Zweier JL. Development and optimization of three-dimensional spatial EPR imaging for biological organs and tissues. J Magn Reson B 1995;106:122-130.
15. He G, Shankar RA, Chzhan M, Samouilov A, Kuppusamy P, Zweier JL. Noninvasive measurement of anatomic structure and intraluminal oxygenation in the gastrointestinal tract of living mice with spatial and spectral EPR imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:4586-4591.