Relative obliqueness and the contribution of nonheads in the subcategorization of old English compound verbs

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 13-36

  Goh, Gwang Yoon ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042581605     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1360674300000125     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. ASPR = Krapp, G. P. & E. V. K. Dobbie (1931-53). The Anglo-Saxon poetic records: a collective edition. 6 vols. New York: Columbia University Press.
2. ÆCHom i, ii = Thorpe, B. (1844-46, 1971). The sermones catholici or homilies ofÆlfric. 2 vols. London: The Ælfric Society.
3. ÆLS = Skeat, W. (1881-1900). Ælfric's lives of saints. EETS OS 76, 82, 94, and 114. [volume, life, line].
4. Beo = Klaeber, F. (1922, 1928, 1936, 1941, 1950). Beowulf and The fight at Finnsburg. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Co.
5. B1Hom = Morris, R. (1874, 1876, 1880, 1967). The Buckling homilies. EETS OS 58, 63, and 73
6. Bo = Sedgefield, W. J. (1899). King Alfred's Old English version of Boethius' de consolatione philosophiae. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Christ = Christ in ASPR 3.
8. COE = Venezky, R. L. and A. diP. Healey (eds.) (1980). A microfiche concordance to Old English. Toronto: Center for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.
9. EETS = Early English Text Society.
10. Lk = The gospel according to St Luke. The four gospels in Anglo-Saxon, Northumbrian, and Old Mercian versions, edited by Skeat, W. W. (1871-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Quoted by chapter and verse]
11. Mk = The gospel according to St Mark. The four gospels in Anglo-Saxon, Northumbrian, and Old Mercian versions, edited by Skeat, W. W. (1871-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Quoted by chapter and verse]
12. Ps = Thorpe, B. (1835). Libri psalmorum versio Antuqia Latina; cum paraphrasi Anglo-Saxonica. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Quoted by psalm number and line]
13. Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Bolinger, D. (1975). On the passive in English. LACUS (Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States) 1: 57-80.
15. Bosworth, J. & T. N. Toller (1898). An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Bresnan, J. (1982a). Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 343-434.
17. Bresnan, J. (ed.) (1982b). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Campbell, A. (1959). Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press
19. Campbell, A. (1972). Enlarged addenda and corrigenda to the supplement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology: syntax and morphology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Davison, A. (1980). Peculiar passives. Language 56: 42-66.
22. de la Cruz, J. M. (1973). A late 13th century change in English structure. Orbis 22: 161-76.
23. Denison, D. (1985). Why Old English had no prepositional passive. English Studies 66: 189-204.
24. Denison, D. (1993). English historical syntax: verbal constructions. London: Longman.
25. Di Sciullo, A. M. & E. Williams (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Dowty, D. (1982a). Grammatical relations and Montague grammar. In Jacobson, P. & G. K. Pullum (eds.), The nature of syntactic representation. Dordrecht: Reidel. 79-130.
27. Dowty, D. (1982b). More on the categorial analysis of grammatical relations. In Zaenen, A. (ed.), Subjects and other subjects. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. 115-53.
28. Gazdar, G. (1982). Phrase structure grammar. In Jacobson, P. & G. K. Pullum (eds.), The nature of syntactic representation. Dordrecht: Reidel. 131-86.
29. Gazdar, G., E. Klein, K. Geoffrey, & I. A. Sag (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Goh, G-Y. (1999). Case government of Old English verbs. Journal of English Linguistics 27: 143-69.
31. Goh, G-Y. (in press). Alternative case markings in Old English texts. English Studies 81.
32. Goh, G-Y. (to appear). The advent of the English prepositional passive: an innovation of Middle English? English Studies 82.
33. Hall, J. R. Clark (1960). A concise Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
34. Hinrichs, E. & T. Nakazawa (1989). Flipped out AUX in German. Papers from the 25th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 193-202.
35. Hinrichs, E. &T. Nakazawa (1993). Aspects of German VP structure: an HPSG account. Technical Report SfS-Report-01-93, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.
36. Hinrichs, E. & T. Nakazawa (1994). Linearizing finite AUX in German complex VPs. In Nerbonne, J., K. Netter, & C. Pollard (eds.), German in head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford: CSLI. 11-37.
37. Johnson, D. & P. Postal (1980). Arc pair grammar. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38. Kathol, A. (1994). Passives without lexical rules. In Nerbonne, J., K. Netter, & C. Pollard (eds.) German in head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford: CSLI. 237-72.
39. Keenan, E. L. & B. Comrie (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63-99.
40. Keenan, E. L. & B. Comrie (1979). Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55: 331-51.
41. Kim, H. (1997). Subcategorization inheritance in Old English P-V compounds. Journal of Linguistics 33: 39-66.
42. Lieber, R. (1983). Argument linking and compounds in English. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 251-85.
43. Lieber, R. (1992). Deconstructing morphology: word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. McLaughlin, J. (1983). Old English syntax: a handbook. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
45. Mitchell, B. (1985). Old English syntax, vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46. Mitchell, B. & F.C. Robinson (1992). A guide to Old English. 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
47. Perlmutter, D. & P. Postal (1977). Toward a universal characterization of passivization. Proceedings of the 3rd annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley. 394-417.
48. Perlmutter, D. & P. Postal (1983). Some proposed laws of basic clause structure. In Perlmutter, D. (ed.), Studies in relational grammar 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 81-128.
49. Plank, F. (1983). Coming into being among the Anglo-Saxons. In Davenport, M., et al. (eds.), Current topics in English historical linguistics. Odense: Odense University Press. 239-78.
50. Pollard, C. (1993). On formal grammar and empirical linguistics. Cognitive Science Technical Reports 3. Columbus, OH: Center for Cognitive Science, Ohio State University.
51. Pollard, C. (1994). Towards a unified account of passive in German. In Nerbonne, J., K. Netter, & C. Pollard (eds.), German in head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford: CSLI. 273-96.
52. Pollard, C. & I. Sag (1987). Information-based syntax and semantics (vol. 1), Fundamentals. CSLI Lecture Notes no. 13. Stanford: CSLI publications. Distributed by University of Chicago Press.
53. Pollard, C. & I. Sag (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Postal, P. (1986). Studies of passive clauses. Albany: State University of New York Press.
55. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, & J. Svartvik (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London/New York: Longman.
56. Riddle, E., G. Sheintuch, & Y. Ziv (1977). Pseudo-passivization: on the role of pragmatics. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 7: 147-56.
57. Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Smyth, H. W. (1956). Greek grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Spencer, A. (1991). Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
60. Toller, T. N. (1921). Supplement to an Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
61. Toman, J. (1987). Issues in the theory of inheritance. Papers delivered at the round table on word-structure theories, Fourteenth International Congress of Linguists, Berlin.
62. Visser, F. T. (1963-73). An historical syntax of the English language. 3 parts; 4 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
63. Williams, E. (1981). On the notions 'lexically related' and 'head of a word'. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245-74.
64. Zwicky, A. (1993). Heads, bases and functors. In Corbett, G. G., N. Fraser, & S. McGlashan (eds.), Heads in grammatical theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 292-315.