The influence of contextual cue on antinociceptive tolerance and facilitation of memory with morphine

Journal of Pharmacological Sciences

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 237-244

  Nakama Kitamura, Mototaka ^a   Doe, Nobutaka ^a  

^a KWANSEI GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Associative antinociceptive tolerance; Contextual specificity; Memory facilitation; Passive avoidance test; Tail pinch test

Indexed keywords

DIAZEPAM; MORPHINE; SCOPOLAMINE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTINOCICEPTION; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG TOLERANCE; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEMORY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PASSIVE AVOIDANCE; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING;

EID: 0042565943     PISSN: 13478613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1254/jphs.92.237     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Siegel S. Evidence from rats that morphine tolerance is a learned response. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1975;89:498-506.
2. Siegel S, Baptista MA, Kim JA, McDonald RV, Weise-Kelly L. Pavlovian psychopharmacology: The associative basis of tolerance. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;8:276-293.
3. Tiffany ST, Dribes DJ, Cepeda-Benito A. Contribution of associative and nonassociative process to the development of morphine tolerance. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992;109:185-190.
4. Westbrook RF, Greely JD. Conditioned tolerance to morphine hypoalgesia: Compensatory hyperalagesia in the experiment: Group-conditioned hypoalgesia in the control group? Q J Exp Psychol [B]. 1992;45:161-187.
5. Nakama-Kitamura M, Kawai N, Hayashi T, Imada H. An analysis of the effects of contextual cues on the development of morphine tolerance in rats. Jpn J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002;22:79-84.
6. Nakama-Kitamura M. The role of contextual cues on counterirritation in the development process of analgesic tolerance to morphine. Life Sci. 2002;72:531-540.
7. Cepada-Benito A, Tiffany ST, Cox LS. Context-specific morphine tolerance on the paw-pressure and tail-shock vocalization tests: Evidence of associative tolerance without conditioned compensatory responding. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999;145:426-432.
8. Izuquierdo I. Effect of naloxone and morphine on various form of memory in the rat: Possible role of endogenous opiate mechanism in memory consolidation. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979;66:199-203.
9. Messing RB, Jensen RA, Vasquez BJ, Martinez JL Jr, Spiehler VR, McGaugh JL. Opiate modulation of memory. In: Martinez JL Jr, Jensen RA, Messing RB, Rigter H, McGaugh JL, editors. Endogenous Peptides and Learning and Memory Processes. New York: Academic Press; 1981. p. 431-443.
10. Rigter H, Hannan TJ, Messing RB, et al. Enkephalins interfere with acquisition of an active avoidance response. Life Sci. 1980;26:337-345.
11. Izuquierdo I. Naloxone facilitation of memory. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1983;10:411.
12. Nishimura M, Shiig Y, Kaneto H. State dependent and/or direct memory retrieval by morphine in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;100:27-30.
13. Shiigi Y, Takahashi M, Kaneto H. Facilitation of memory retrieval by pretest morphine mediated by μ but not δ and κ opioid receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;102:329-332.
14. Classen W, Mondadori C. Facilitation or inhibition of memory by morphine: A question of experimental parameters. Experientia. 1984;40:506-509.
15. Baker TB, Tiffany ST. Morphine tolerance as habituation. Psychol Rev. 1985;92:78-108.
16. Palletta MS, Wagner AR. Development of context-specific tolerance to morphine: Support for a dual process interaction. Behav Neurosci. 1986;100:611-623.
17. Poulos CX, Cappell H. Homeostatic theory of drug tolerance: A general method of physiological adaptation. Psychol Rev. 1991;98:390-408.
18. Ramsey DS, Wood SC. Biological consequences of drug administration: Implications for acute and chronic tolerance. Psychol Rev. 1997;104:170-193.
19. Takagi H, Inukai T, Nakama M. A modification of Haffner's method for testing analgesia. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1966;16:287-294.
20. Kim JA, Siegel S, Patenall VRA. Drug-onset cues as signals: Interadministration associations and tolerance. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999;25:491-504.
21. Tiffany ST, Maude-Griffin PM, Drobes DJ. Effect of interdose interval on the development of associative tolerance to morphine in the rat: A dose response analysis. Behav Neurosci. 1991;105:49-61.
22. Kurahashi T, Horita N, Sato Y, Hino Y, Satoh M, Takagi H. Evidence that substance P and somatostatin transmit separate information related to pain in the spinal dorsal horn. Brain Res. 1985;325:294-298.
23. Quartermain D, Judge ME. Recovery of memory following forgetting induced by depletion of biogenic amines. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1983;18:179-184.
24. Arai K, Matsuki N, Ikegaya Y, Nishiyama N. Deterioration of spatial learning performance in lipopolysaccharide treated mice. Jpn J Pharmacol. 2001;87:195-201.
25. Corrigall WA, Linseman MA. Conditioned place preference produced by intra-hippocampal morphine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988;30:787-789.
26. Matsuoka N, Kaneko S, Satoh M. Somatostatin augments long-term potentiation of the mossy fiber-CA3 system in guinea-pig hippocampal slices. Brain Res. 1991;553:188-194.
27. Tomaz C, Aguiar MS, Nogueira PJ. Facilitation of memory by peripheral administration of substance P and naloxone using avoidance and habituation learning task. Neurosci Behav Rev. 1990;14:447-453.
28. Tomaz C, Nogueira PJ. Facilitation of memory by peripheral administration of substance P. Behav Brain Res. 1997;83:143-145.
29. Watanabe T, Nakagawa T, Yamamoto R, Maeda A, Minami M, Satoh M. Involvement of glutamate receptors within the central nucleus of the amygdale in naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal-induced conditioned place aversion in rats. Jpn J Pharmacol. 2002;88:399-406.
30. Lufty K, Hurbut D, Weber E. Blockade of morphine-induced-analgesia and tolerance in mice by MK-801. Brain Res. 1993;616:83-88.
31. Slot LAB, Colpert FC. Recall rendered dependent on an opiate state. Behav Neurosci. 1999;113:337-344.
32. Overton DA. Contextual stimulus effects of drugs and internal states. In: Balsam BD, Tomie A, editors. Context and Learning. New Jersey: Erlbaum Hillsdale; 1985. p. 357-384.
33. Solomon RL, Corbit JD. An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of effect. Psychol Rev. 1974;81:119-145.
34. Wagner AR. Priming in STM: An information processing mechanism for self-generated or retrieval-generated depression in performance. In: Tigh TJ, Leaton RN, editors. Habituation: Perspective from Child Development, Animal Behavior, and Neurophysiology. New Jersey: Erlbaum Hillsdale; 1974. p. 95-128.
35. Wagner AR. SOP: A model of autonomic memory processing in animal behavior. In: Spear NE, Miller RR, editors. Information Processing in Animals: Memory Mechanisms. New Jersey: Erlbaum Hillsdale; 1981. p. 5-47.