India.com: The construction of a space between

Progress in Human Geography

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 414-437

  Adams, Paul C ^a   Ghose, Rina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Diaspora; Globalization; India; Internet

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; ETHNICITY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET;

INDIA;

EID: 0042563410     PISSN: 03091325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0309132503ph437oa     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abler, R. 1975: Effects of space-adjusting technologies on the human geography of the future. In Abler, R., Janelle, D., Philbrick, A. and Sommer, J., editors, Human geography in a shrinking world, North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press, 36-56.
2. Adams, P. 1992: Television as gathering place. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 82, 117-35.
3. Adams, P. 1995: A reconsideration of personal boundaries in space-time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85, 267-85.
4. Adams, P. 1997: Cyberspace and virtual places. The Geographical Review 87(2), 155-71.
5. Adams, P. 1998: Network topologies and virtual place. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88, 88-106.
6. Adams, P. 2000: Application of a CAD-based accessibility model. In Janelle, D. and Hodge, D., editors, Accessibility in the information age, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 217-39.
7. Angelo, M. 1997: The Sikh diaspora: tradition and change in an immigrant community. New York and London: Garland Publishing Company.
8. Appadurai, A. 1996: Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Biers, D. and Sidhva, S. 1997: Life in the slow lane. Far Eastern Economic Review 21 August, 137-40.
10. Bingham, N. 1999: Unthinkable complexity? Cyberspace otherwise. In Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J., editors, Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations, London and New York: Routledge, 244-60.
11. Brunn, S. and Cottle, C. 1997: Small states and cyberboosterism. The Geographical Review 87(2), 240-58.
12. Chernaik, L. 1999: Transnationalism, techno-science and difference: the analysis of material-semiotic practices. In Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J., editors, Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations. New York and London: Routledge, 79-91.
13. Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J. 1999: Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations. London and New York: Routledge.
14. Cutchin, M. 2002: Virtual medical geographies: conceptualizing telemedicine and regionalization. Progress in Human Geography 26, 19-39.
15. Dasgupta, S. 1989: On the trail of an uncertain dream: Indian immigrant experience in America. New York: AMS Press, Inc.
16. Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service 1999: The Triennial Comprehensive Report on Immigration. Washington, DC (May 1999).
17. Fisher, M. 1980: The Indians of New York City. New Delhi: Heritage Publishers.
18. Foucault, M. 1979: Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison (translated by Alan Sheridan). New York: Random House/Vintage Books.
19. Foucault, M. 1980: Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (edited by C. Gordon. and translated by C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham and K. Soper). New York: Pantheon Books.
20. Froehling, O. 1997: The cyberspace 'war of ink and internet' in Chiapas, Mexico. The Geographical Review 87(2), 291-307.
21. Froehling, O. 1999: Internauts and guerilleros: the Zapatista rebellion in Chiapas, Mexico and its extension into cyberspace. In Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J., editors, Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations, London and New York: Routledge, 164-77.
22. Gillespie, A. and Robins, K. 1989: Geographical inequalities: the spatial bias of the new communications technologies. Journal of Communication 39(3), 7-18.
23. Gould, P. 1991: Dynamic structures of geographic space. In Brunn, S. and Leinbach T., editors, Collapsing space and time: geographic aspects of communication and information, London: HarperCollinsAcademic, 3-30.
24. Graham, S. 1999: Geographies of surveillant simulation. In Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J., editors, Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations, London and New York: Routledge, 131-48.
25. Graham, S. and Marvin, S. 1996: Telecommunications and the city: electronic spaces, urban places. New York and London: Routledge.
26. Hanson, S. 2000: Reconceptualizing accessibility. In Janelle, D. and Hodge, D., editors, Information, place, and cyberspace, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 267-78.
27. Hillis, K. 1996: A geography of the eye: the technologies of virtual reality. In Shields, R., editor, Cultures of internet: virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies, London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 70-98.
28. Hillis, K. 1999: Toward the light 'within': optical technologies, spatial metaphors and changing subjectivities. In Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J., editors, Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations, London and New York: Routledge, 23-43.
29. Holloway, L. 2002: Virtual vegetables and adopted sheep: ethical relation, authenticity and internet-mediated food-production technologies. Area 34(1), 70-81.
30. Imken, O. 1999: The convergence of virtual and actual in the global matrix: artificial life, geoeconomics and psychogeography. In Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J., editors, Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations, London and New York: Routledge, 92-106.
31. India Network Foundation, Inc. 1997-2002: Asian Indian population in the metropolitan areas in the US, 2000. Online file at http://www.indnet.org/census/metropop.htm (last accessed 10 March 2003).
32. Janelle, D. 1969: Spatial reorganization: a model and concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 59, 348-64.
33. Janelle, D. 1973: Measuring human extensibility in a shrinking world. Journal of Geography 72(5), 8-15.
34. Janelle, D. and Hodge, D., editors 2000: Information, place, and cyberspace: issues in accessibility. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer-Verlag.
35. Kwan, M.-P. 2000: Human extensibility and individual hybrid-accessibility in space-time: a multi-scale representation using GIS. In Janelle, D. and Hodge, D., editors, Accessibility in the information age, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 241-56.
36. Larner, W. 1999: Consumers or workers?: restructuring telecommunications in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J., editors, Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations, London and New York: Routledge, 63-78.
37. Light, J. 1999: From city space to cyberspace. In Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J., editors, Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations, London and New York: Routledge, 109-30.
38. McLuhan, M. and Fiore, Q. 1967: The medium is the massage: an inventory of effects. New York: Bantam Books.
39. O'Lear, S. 1997: Electronic communication and environmental policy in Russia and Estonia. The Geographical Review 87(2), 275-90.
40. Parr, H. 2002: New body-geographies: the embodied spaces of health and medical information on the internet. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20, 73-95.
41. Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
42. Ray, C. and Talbot, H. 1999: Rural telematics: the information society and rural development. In Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J., editors, Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations, London and New York: Routledge, 149-63.
43. Saran, P. 1985: The Asian Indian experience in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing.
44. Segal, U. 1998: The Asian Indian-American family. In Mindel, C., Habenstein, R. and Wright, R., editors, Ethnic families in America: patterns and variations (fourth edition), New York: Elsevier, 331-60.
45. Shah, A. 2002: Deferring to the diaspora. The Indian Express 17 January. Online file at http://www.indian-express.com/columnists/amri/20020117.html (last accessed 10 March 2003).
46. Smith, M.A. and Kollock, P., editor 1999: Communities in cyberspace. London and New York: Routledge.
47. Starrs, P. 1997: The sacred, the regional, and the digital. The Geographical Review 87(2), 193-218.
48. Stein, J. 1999: The telephone: its social shaping and public negotiation in late nineteenth-and early twentieth-century London. In Crang, M., Crang, P. and May, J., editors, Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations, London and New York: Routledge, 44-62.
49. Sui, D. 2000: The e-merging geography of the information society: from accessibility to adaptability. In Janelle, D. and Hodge, D., editors, Information, place, and cyberspace: issues in accessibility, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer-Verlag, 107-29.
50. Taylor, J. 1997: The emerging geographies of virtual worlds. The Geographical Review 87(2), 172-92.
51. Tinder, G. 1980: Community: reflections on a tragic ideal. Baton Rouge and London: Louisiana State University Press.
52. Tuan, Y.-F. 1977: Space and place: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
53. Tuan, Y.-F. 1996: Cosmos and hearth: a cosmopolite's viewpoint. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
54. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) 2000: Leading employers of specialty occupation workers (H-1B): October 1999-February 2000. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/shared/services/employerinfo/ hltop100.pdf (last accessed 10 March 2003).
55. Warf, B. and Grimes, J. 1997: Counterhegemonic discourses and the internet. The Geographical Review 87(2), 259-74.
56. Westwood, S. and Phizacklea, A. 2000: Transnationalism and the politics of belonging. London and New York: Routledge.