Two Concepts of Tolerance: Or Why Bayle Is Not Locke

Journal of Political Philosophy

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 302-321

  Jenkinson, Sally L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042538974     PISSN: 09638016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00054.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. See John Rawls in A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972), p. 212, where toleration is defined in this second sense as referring, in 'secular' society, to 'a regime guaranteeing moral liberty and freedom of thought'. Studies which draw attention to the ambiguities inherent in ethical and political uses of the concept include Preston King, Toleration (London: Allen & Unwin, 1976); J. Horton & S. Mendus, eds, Justifying Toleration (London: Methuen, 1985); S. Mendus and D. Edwards, eds, On Toleration (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987); and John Horton, 'Toleration', Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, ed. David Miller et al. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), pp. 521-3; Stephen Macedo 'Toleration and fundamentalism', A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, ed. R. E. Goodin and P. Pettit (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), pp. 622-9.
2. See John Rawls in A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972), p. 212, where toleration is defined in this second sense as referring, in 'secular' society, to 'a regime guaranteeing moral liberty and freedom of thought'. Studies which draw attention to the ambiguities inherent in ethical and political uses of the concept include Preston King, Toleration (London: Allen & Unwin, 1976); J. Horton & S. Mendus, eds, Justifying Toleration (London: Methuen, 1985); S. Mendus and D. Edwards, eds, On Toleration (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987); and John Horton, 'Toleration', Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, ed. David Miller et al. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), pp. 521-3; Stephen Macedo 'Toleration and fundamentalism', A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, ed. R. E. Goodin and P. Pettit (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), pp. 622-9.
3. See John Rawls in A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972), p. 212, where toleration is defined in this second sense as referring, in 'secular' society, to 'a regime guaranteeing moral liberty and freedom of thought'. Studies which draw attention to the ambiguities inherent in ethical and political uses of the concept include Preston King, Toleration (London: Allen & Unwin, 1976); J. Horton & S. Mendus, eds, Justifying Toleration (London: Methuen, 1985); S. Mendus and D. Edwards, eds, On Toleration (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987); and John Horton, 'Toleration', Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, ed. David Miller et al. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), pp. 521-3; Stephen Macedo 'Toleration and fundamentalism', A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, ed. R. E. Goodin and P. Pettit (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), pp. 622-9.
4. See John Rawls in A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972), p. 212, where toleration is defined in this second sense as referring, in 'secular' society, to 'a regime guaranteeing moral liberty and freedom of thought'. Studies which draw attention to the ambiguities inherent in ethical and political uses of the concept include Preston King, Toleration (London: Allen & Unwin, 1976); J. Horton & S. Mendus, eds, Justifying Toleration (London: Methuen, 1985); S. Mendus and D. Edwards, eds, On Toleration (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987); and John Horton, 'Toleration', Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, ed. David Miller et al. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), pp. 521-3; Stephen Macedo 'Toleration and fundamentalism', A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, ed. R. E. Goodin and P. Pettit (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), pp. 622-9.
5. See John Rawls in A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972), p. 212, where toleration is defined in this second sense as referring, in 'secular' society, to 'a regime guaranteeing moral liberty and freedom of thought'. Studies which draw attention to the ambiguities inherent in ethical and political uses of the concept include Preston King, Toleration (London: Allen & Unwin, 1976); J. Horton & S. Mendus, eds, Justifying Toleration (London: Methuen, 1985); S. Mendus and D. Edwards, eds, On Toleration (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987); and John Horton, 'Toleration', Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, ed. David Miller et al. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), pp. 521-3; Stephen Macedo 'Toleration and fundamentalism', A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, ed. R. E. Goodin and P. Pettit (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), pp. 622-9.
6. See John Rawls in A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972), p. 212, where toleration is defined in this second sense as referring, in 'secular' society, to 'a regime guaranteeing moral liberty and freedom of thought'. Studies which draw attention to the ambiguities inherent in ethical and political uses of the concept include Preston King, Toleration (London: Allen & Unwin, 1976); J. Horton & S. Mendus, eds, Justifying Toleration (London: Methuen, 1985); S. Mendus and D. Edwards, eds, On Toleration (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987); and John Horton, 'Toleration', Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, ed. David Miller et al. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), pp. 521-3; Stephen Macedo 'Toleration and fundamentalism', A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, ed. R. E. Goodin and P. Pettit (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), pp. 622-9.