The digital imaging workstation

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 142-162

  Arenson, Ronald L ^a   Chakraborty, Dev P ^a   Seshadri, Sridhar B ^a   Kundel, Harold L ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assistedRadiography; Digital; Display images; Images; Storages and retrievalRadiography

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL IMAGE STORAGE; IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; RADIOGRAPHY;

COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL IMAGING; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER TERMINAL; HISTORY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION;

COMPUTER TERMINALS; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0042526622     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-002-6004-y     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Seshadri SB, Arenson RL, DeSimone D, Hiss S: Cost-savings associated with a digital radiology department: a preliminary study. Presented at the Ninth Conference on Computer Applications in Radiology, Hilton Head, SC, June 1988
2. Gee JC, DeSoto LA, Kim Y, Haynor DR, Loop JW: User interface design for a radiological imaging workstation. SPIE Med Imaging III 1093:122-132, 1989
3. Braudes SE, Mun SK, Sibert, J, Schnizlein J, Horii S: Workstation modelling and development: clinical definition of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) user interface. SPIE Med Imaging III 1093:376-386, 1989
4. Cox GG, McMillan JH, Wetzel LH, Siegel EL, Templeton AW, Dwyer III SJ: Direct diagnosis from a 2,000 × 2,000 × 12-bit displays: comparison with hard copy (abstr). Radiology 173:471, 1989
5. MacMahon H, Metz C, Doi K, Kim T, Giger ML, Chan H: Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy. Radiology 168:669-673, 1988
6. Yamasaki K, Sato K, Kusumoto M, Adachi S, Kuno M: Comparative studies of physical characteristics and clinical efficacy of digitized chest image (abstr). Radiology 173(P):226, 1989
7. Oestmann JW, Greene R, Rubens JR, et al. High-frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Invest Radiol 24:643-646, 1989
8. Ishida M, Frank PH, Doi K, Lehr JL: High quality digital radiographic images: improved detection of low-contrast objects and preliminary clinical studies. Radio-Graphics 3:325-338, 1983
9. Sheline ME, Brikman I, Epstein D, Mezrich J, Kundel RL, Arenson RL: The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules; comparison between standard and inverse digitized images and conventional chest radiographs. AJR 152:261-263, 1989
10. Cornsweet TH, Pensker HM: Luminance discrimination of brief flashes under various conditions of adaption. J Physiol (Lond) 176:294-310, 1965
11. Hendee WR: The physical principles of computed tomography. Little Brown, Boston, 1983
12. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Thickman D, Carmody D, Toto L: Nodule detection with and without a chest image. Invest Radiol 20:94-99, 1985
13. Metz CE: ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 21:720-733, 1986
14. Foley WD, Wilson CR, Keyes GS, et al: The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Radiology 141:25-31, 1981
15. Huebener K-H: Scanned projection radiography of the chest versus standard film radiography: a comparison of 250 cases. Radiology 148:363-368, 1983
16. Seeley GW, Newell JD: The use of psychophysical principles in the design of a total digital radiology department. Radiol Clin North Am 23:341-348, 1985
17. MacMahon H, Vyborny CJ, Metz CE, Doi K, Sabeti S, Solomon S: Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance. Radiology 158:21-26, 1986
18. Lams PM, Cocklin ML: Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases. Radiology 158:11-19, 1986
19. Goodman LR, Foley WD, Wilson DR, Rimm AA, Lawson TL: Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with film digital radiography system. Radiology 158:27-33, 1986
20. Chakraborty DP, Breatnach ES, Yester MV, Soto B, Barnes GT, Fraser R: Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules. Radiology 158:35-39, 1986
21. Niklason LT, Hickey NM, Chakraborty DP, et al: Simulated pulmonary nodules: detection with dual energy digital versus conventional radiography. Radiology 160: 589-593, 1986.
22. Kushner DC, Cleveland RH, Herman TE, et al: Low-dose flying spot digital radiography of the chest: sensitivity studies. Radiology 163: 685-688, 1987.
23. Barnes GT, Sabbagh EA, Chakraborty DP, et al: A comparison of dual-energy digital radiography and screen-film imaging in the detection of subtle interstitial pulmonary disease. Invest Radiol 24: 585-591, 1989
24. Chan H, Vyborny CJ, MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi EA, Sickles EA: Digital mammography ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications. Invest Radiol 22: 581-589, 1987
25. Oestmann JW, Kopans D, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, Rubens JR, Greene R: A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications. Invest Radiol 23: 726-723, 1988
26. Seeley, GW, Stempski M, Roehrig H, Nudelman S, Capp MP: Psychological comparison of a video display system to film by using bone fracture images. Presented at the First International Symposium on Medical Imaging and Image Interpretation. Federal Republic of Germany, Berlin, October 1982
27. Murphey MD: Digital skeletal radiography: spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiosteal resorption. AJR 152: 541-546, 1989
28. Kasta DJ, Ackerman LV, Feczko PJ: Digital gastrointestinal imaging: the effect of pixel size on detection of subtle mucosal abnormalities. Radiology 167: 853-856, 1987
29. Fajardo LL, Hillman BJ, Hunter TB, Claypool HR, Westerman BR, Mockbee B: Excretory urography using computed radiography. Radiology 162: 345-351, 1987
30. Rose A: Vision, human and electronic. Plenum, New York, 1973
31. Kruger RA, Mistretta CA, Riederer SJ: Physical and technical considerations of computerized fluoroscopy difference imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci NS25:205-212, 1981
32. Rimkus D, Baily NA: Patient exposure requirements for high contrast resolution in digital radiographic systems. AJR 142:603-608, 1984
33. Tannas LE: Flat-panel displays and CRTs. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1985
34. Suddarth SA, Johnson GA, Sherrier RH, Ravin CE: Performance of high-resolution monitors for digital chest imaging. Med Phys 14:253-257, 1987
35. Johnston RE: Display monitors. Presented at the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Summer School in Image Communication and Image Analysis, Ann Arbor, Mien, July 12-17, 1987
36. O'Malley KG, Giunta JA: The alternator: determination of its fundamental features, as a basis for design of a PACS. SPIE Med Imaging II 914:988-994, 1988
37. Kasaday LR: Human factor considerations in PACS design. SPIE Med XIV PACS IV 626:581-592, 1986
38. Rogers DC, Johnston RE, Brenton B, Staab EV, Thomson B, Perry JR: Predicting PACS console requirements from radiologists' reading habits. SPIE PACS III 536:88-96, 1985
39. Beard D, Pizer S, Rogers D, Cromartie R: A prototype single-screen PACS console development using human computer interaction techniques. SPIE Med Imaging 767:646-653, 1987
40. Johnston RE, Beard DV, Creasy JL, Perry JR: UNC PACS II: consoles. Presented at the Ninth Conference on Computer Applications in Radiology, Hilton Head, SC, June 1-4, 1988
41. Lo SB, Mun SK, Braudes RE, Levine BA: A work-station for rapid image presentation. SPIE Med Imaging III:1093-1098, 1989
42. Human Factors Society: American national standards for human factors engineering of visual display terminal workstations. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, Calif, 1988
43. van der Voorde F, Arenson RL, Kundel HL, et al: Development of a physician friendly digital image display console. PACS IV 626:541-548, 1986
44. Alter AJ, Kargas GA, Kargas SA, et al: The influence of ambient and viewbox light upon visual detection of low-contrast targets in a radiograph. Invest Radiol 17:402-406, 1982
45. Rogers DC, Johnston RE: Effect of ambient light on electronically displayed medical images as measured by luminance-discrimination thresholds. J Opt Soc Am [A] 4:976-983, 1987
46. Seshadri SB, Arenson RL, Khalsa SS, Brikman IS, van der Voorde F: Prototype image management system (MIMS) at the University of Pennsylvania: software design considerations. SPIE Med Imaging 767:793-800, 1987
47. Haynor DR, Saarinen AO: "Old study" and the correlative study: implications for PACS. SPIE Med Imaging III 1093: 10-12, 1989
48. Cox GG, Templeton AW, Anderson WH, Cook LT, Hensley KS, Dwyer SJ: Estimating digital information throughput rates for radiology networks. Invest Radiol 21:162-169, 1986
49. Arenson RL, Seshadri SB, Stevens F, van der Voorde F: The overlapping domains and interface between radiology information management systems and medical image management systems (PACS). Proceedings of computer assisted radiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987, pp. 855-865
50. Arenson RL, Seshadri SB, Kundel HL, et al: Clinical evaluation of a medical image management system for chest images. AJR 150:55-59, 1988
51. Gershon-Cohen J, Fisher JF: Television contrast expansion of single roentgenograms. AJR 81:325-327, 1959
52. Meyers PH, Becker HC, Sweeney JW, Nice C, Netleton WJ: Evaluation of a computer retrieved radiographic image. Radiology 201:83-85, 1963
53. Nathan R: Picture enhancement for the moon, Mars, and man. In: Cheng GC. Ledley RS. Pollock DK. Rosenfeld A eds. Pictorial pattern recognition. Thomson, Washington, DC, 1968, pp. 239-266
54. Kundell HL, Revesz G, Stauffer HM: The electro-optical processing of radiographic images. Radiol Clin North Am 8:447-460, 1969
55. Mistretta CA, Crummy AB: Diagnosis of cardiovascular disease by digital subtraction angiography. Science 214:761-765, 1981
56. Ishida M, Frank PH, Doi K, Lehr JL: High quality digital radiographic images: improved detection of low-contrast objects and preliminary clinical studies. Radio-Graphics 3:325-338, 1982
57. Kundell HL: Visual perception and image display terminals. Radiol Clin North Am 24:69-78, 1986
58. Schreiber WF: Fundamentals of electronic imaging systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986
59. Pizer SM, Chan FH: Evaluation of the number of discernible levels produced by a display. In: Dipaola R. Kahn E eds. Information processing in medical imaging. Proceedings of the VIth International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Vol 88. INSERM, Paris, 1980
60. Cromartie RC, Johnston RE, Pizer SM, Rogers D: Standardization of electronic display devices based on human perception. University of North Carolina Department of Computer Science technical report 88-002. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 1987
61. Pizer SM, Zimmerman JB, Staab EV: Adaptive grey level assignment in CT scan display. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8:300-305, 1984
62. McShan DL, Glickman AS: Color displays for medical imaging in color and the computer. In: Durrett HJ ed. Color and the computer. Academic Press, San Diego, 1987, pp. 189-204
63. Chan FH, Pizer SM.: An ultrasonogram display system using natural color. JCU 4:335-338, 1976
64. Vannier MW, Rickman D: Multispectral and color-aided displays. Invest Radiol 24:88-91, 1989
65. DeSimone DN, Kundel HL, Arenson RL, et al: Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behavior in an intensive care unit. Radiology 169:41-44, 1988
66. Swett HA, Miller PL: ICON: computer-based approach to differential diagnosis in radiology. Radiology 163:555-558, 1987
67. Fischer HW: Danger ahead (editorial). Radiology 169:267, 1988
68. Arenson RL: Opportunity ahead (editorial response). Radiology 169:267-268, 1988