Electrochemical and physical evaluations of coil coatings on metal-coated steels for roofing applications

Progress in Organic Coatings

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 136-146

  Murray, J N ^a   Stephenson, L D ^b   Kumar, A ^b  

^a CERL ^*  (United States)

^b US ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Coil coated galvanized steels; Cyclic vs. continuous exposures; EIS; Electrochemical evaluations; Polyester topcoat; PVF2 topcoat; Silicone modified polyester topcoat

Indexed keywords

ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTROLYTES; GALVANIZED METAL; POLYESTERS; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; STEEL;

PHYSICAL EVALUATIONS;

ORGANIC COATINGS;

EID: 0042510641     PISSN: 03009440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-9440(03)00114-0     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. A. Kumar, A. Odeh, O. Valente, V. Van Blaricum, in: Proceedings of the CORROSION'92 on AC Impedance Spectra of Pipes Buried in Soil, P/N 92231, NACE, Houston, TX, 1992.
2. Repp J. Accelerated corrosion testing - truths and misconceptions. Mater. Perf. 41(9):2002;60-63.
3. R. Baboian (Ed.), Corrosion Tests and Standards, Application and Interpretation, ASTM Manual Series, MNL 20, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1995.
4. J.W. Martin, S.C. Saunders, F.L. Floyd, J.P. Wineburg, Methodologies for Predicting the Service Lives of Coating Systems, NIST Building Science Series, vol. 172, NIST, Gathersburg, MD, 1994.
5. Martin J.W., McKnight M.E., Nguyen T., Embree E. Continuous wet vs. cyclic wet-dry salt immersion results for scribed coated steel panels. J. Coat. Technol. 61(772):1989;39-48.
6. Murray J.N. Electrochemical test methods for evaluating organic coatings on metals: an update. Part I. Introduction and generalities regarding electrochemical testing of organic coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 30:1997;225-233.
7. D.D. Macdonald, in: Some Advantages and Pitfalls of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Corrosion, vol. 46, No. 3, March 1990, pp. 229-242; Also as P/N 30, CORROSION'89, NACE, Houston, TX 1989.
8. D.D. Macdonald, in: Some Advantages and Pitfalls of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Corrosion, vol. 46, No. 3, March 1990, pp. 229-242; Also as P/N 30, CORROSION'89, NACE, Houston, TX 1989.
9. R. Hirayama, S. Haruyama, Electrochemical Impedance for Degraded Coated Steel Having Pores, Corrosion, vol. 47, No. 12, December 1991, pp. 952-958 (Based on: S. Haruyama, M. Asari, T. Tsuru, in: Proceedings of the Impedance Characteristics During Degradation of Coated Steel, vol. 87, No. 2, The Electrochemical Society, 1987), pp. 197-207.
10. R. Hirayama, S. Haruyama, Electrochemical Impedance for Degraded Coated Steel Having Pores, Corrosion, vol. 47, No. 12, December 1991, pp. 952-958 (Based on: S. Haruyama, M. Asari, T. Tsuru, in: Proceedings of the Impedance Characteristics During Degradation of Coated Steel, vol. 87, No. 2, The Electrochemical Society, 1987), pp. 197-207.
11. M. Odeh, Evaluation of galvanizing and galvalume steel panels with Kynar and silicone modified polyester organic top coatings for military roofing applications, CERL Internal Report, Champaign, IL, 1999.
12. Walter G.W. A review of impedance plot methods used for corrosion performance analysis of painted metals. Corros. Sci. 26:1986;681-703.
13. Brasher D.M., Kingsbury A.H. Electrical measurements in the study of immersed paint coatings on metal. 1. Comparison between capacitance and gravimetric methods of estimating water-uptake. J. Appl. Chem. 4:1954;62-71.
14. J.N. Murray, Evaluating architectural coatings in immersion conditions using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), Presented at the SSPC Coating Evaluation and Durability Conference, May 1991, Pittsburgh, PA.
15. Bacon R.C., Smith J.J., Rugg F.M. Electrolytic resistance in evaluating protective merit of coatings on metals. I & EC. 40(1):1948;161-167.