Characteristics of mixed diagnostic radiology-radiation oncology practices

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 181, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 643-647

  Cypel, Yasmin S ^a   Sunshine, Jonathan H ^a,b  

^a AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ONCOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIODIAGNOSIS;

EID: 0042510623     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810643     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cypel YS, Sunshine JH. Basic characteristics of radiology practices: results from the American College of Radiology's 1999 survey. AJR 2003;181:341-349
2. Fowler FJ Jr. Survey research methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993:26-33
3. Blalock HM. Social statistics, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979:190-195
4. Sunshine JH, Cypel YS, Schepps B. Diagnostic radiologists in 2000: basic characteristics, practices, and issues related to the radiologist shortage. AJR 2002;178:291-301
5. Cypel Y, Sunshine JH, Schepps B. Radiation oncologists in 2000: demographic, professional, and practice characteristics. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;53:720-728
6. Association of American Medical Colleges Web site. Available at: www.aamc.org/teachinghospitals.htm. Accessed February 20, 2003
7. Bansal S, Sunshine J. Basic characteristics of radiology groups in the United States: results of a 1991-1992 census. AJR 1994;162:263-270
8. Sunshine JH, Bansal S. Operational, professional, and business characteristics of radiology groups in the United States. Radiology 1992;183:535-540
9. Marks JE. Subspecialization in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992;24:987-988
10. American Board of Radiology Web site. Available at: www.theabr.org. Accessed February 3, 2003
11. Hanks GE, Diamond JJ, Kramer S. The need for complex technology in radiation oncology: correlations of facility characteristics and structure with outcome. Cancer 1985;55:2198-2201
12. Chu JC, Stafford PM, Diamond JJ, Lee M, Hanks GE. Patterns of change in the physics and technical support of radiation therapy in the USA 1975-1986. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;17:437-442
13. Owen JB, Coia LR, Hanks GE. Recent patterns of growth in radiation therapy facilities in the United States: a patterns of care study report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992;24:983-986
14. Deitch CH, Chan WC, Sunshine JH, Shaffer KA. Profile of U.S. radiologists at middecade: overview of findings from the 1995 survey of radiologists. Radiology 1997;202:69-77
15. Imaging Economics Web site. Available at: www.imagingeconomics.com/library/tools/printengine.asp? printarticleID=200210-01. Accessed January 13, 2003
16. Hogan C, Sunshine JH, Schepps B. Hiring of diagnostic radiologists in 1998. AJR 2001;176:307-312
17. Moore DL, Gaudino J, deHart P, Cheadle A, Martin D. Physician response in a trial of high-priority mail and telephone survey mode sequences. In: Cynamon ML, Kulka RA, eds. Seventh conference on health survey research methods. Hyattsville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NCHS, 2001:149-153. DHHS publication (PHS) 01-1013
18. Sunshine JH, Bansal S. Professional and business characteristics of radiology groups in the United States: 1992. Radiology 1995;194:365-371
19. Babbie E. Survey research methods, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1990:132-135
20. DiUman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2000:3-31
21. Groves RM. Survey errors and survey costs. New York: Wiley, 198:8-12