Coalition Building in a Spatial Economy

Journal of Urban Economics

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 136-163

  Henkel, Joachim ^a   Stahl, Konrad ^b   Walz, Uwe ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Endogenous agglomerations; monopolistic competition; coalition building

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042493384     PISSN: 00941190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/juec.1999.2139     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aumann R. Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games IV. 1959;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
2. Bernheim B. D., Peleg B., Whinston M. D. Coalition-proof Nash equilibria. I. Concepts. Journal of Economic Theory. 42:1987;1-12.
3. Christaller W. Die zentralen Orte in Sueddeutschland. 1933;Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena.
4. Church J., Gandal N. Network effects, software provision and standardization. Journal of Industrial Economics. 40:1992;85-103.
5. Dixit A. K., Stiglitz J. E. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review. 67:1977;297-308.
6. Eaton B. C., Lipsey R. G. Comparison shopping and the clustering of homogeneous firms. Journal of Regional Science. 19:1979;421-435.
7. Economides N. Minimal and maximal product differentiation in Hotelling's duopoly. Economic Letters. 21:1986;67-71.
8. Economides N., Siow A. The division of markets is limited by the extent of liquidity. American Economic Review. 78:1988;108-121.
9. Fujita M. A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomeration: Differentiated product approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 18:1988;87-124.
10. Gehrig T. Competing markets. European Economic Review. 42:1998;277-310.
11. Helsley R. W., Strange W. C. Limited developers. Canadian Journal of Economics. 30:1997;329-348.
12. Henderson J. V. The Tiebout model: Bring back the entrepreneur. Journal of Political Economy. 93:1985;248-264.
13. Henkel J. Standorte, Nachfrageexternalitaeten und Preisankuendigungen. 1997;Physica Verlag, Heidelberg.
14. Krugman P. Geography and Trade. 1991;MIT Press, Cambridge.
15. de Palma A. V., Ginsburgh V., Papageorgiou Y., Thisse J.-F. The principle of minimum differentiation holds under sufficient heterogeneity. Econometrica. 53:1985;767-782.
16. Rauch J. E. Does history matter only when it matters little? The case of city-industry location. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 108:1993;843-867.
17. Rivera-Batiz F. Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and agglomeration economies in consumption and production. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 18:1988;125-153.
18. Schulz N., Stahl K. Do consumers search for the highest price? Equilibrium and monopolistic optimum in differentiated products markets. RAND Journal of Economics. 27:1996;542-562.
19. Stahl K. Consumer search and the spatial distribution of retailing. Journal of Industrial Economics. 31:1982;97-114.
20. Stahl K. Location and spatial pricing theory with nonconvex transportation cost schedules. Bell Journal of Economics. 13:1982;575-582.
21. Stahl K. Theories of urban business location. Mills E. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Urban Economics. 2:1987;759-820 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
22. Walz U. Transport costs, intermediate goods, and localized growth. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 26:1996;671-695.
23. Walz U. Does an enlargement of a common market stimulate growth and convergence? Journal of International Economics. 45:1998;197-321.
24. Walz U., Wellisch D. Strategic public provision of local inputs with endogenous locational decisions of oligopolistic firms. International Tax and Public Finance. 3:1996;173-187.