Advancing science communication

Science Communication

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 310-322

  Treise, Debbie ^a   Weigold, Michael F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042486604     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107554700202300306     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Ankney, R., P. Heilman, and J. Kolff. 1996. Newspaper coverage of the coronary artery bypass grafting report. Science Communication 18:153-64.
2. Burkett, W. 1986. New reporting: Science, medicine, and high technology. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
3. Dennis, E., and J. McCartney. 1979. Science journalists on metropolitan dailies. Journal of Environmental Education 10:10-11.
4. Dubas, O., and L. Martel. 1975. Media impact: A research study on science communication. Ottawa, Canada: Ministry of State.
5. Dunwoody, S. 1986. When science writers cover the social sciences. In Reporting science: The case of aggression, edited by J. H. Goldstein, 67-81. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Friedman, S. 1986. The journalist's world. In Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news, edited by S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers, 17-41. New York: Free Press.
7. Gascoigne, T., and J. Metcalfe. 1997. Incentives and impediments to scientists communicating through the media. Science Communication 18:265-82.
8. Hartz, J., and R. Chappell. 1997. Worlds apart: How the distance between science and journalism threatens America's future. Nashville, TN: First Amendment Center.
9. Ismach, A., and E. Dennis. 1978. A profile of newspaper and television reporters in a metropolitan setting. Journalism Quarterly 55:741.
10. Krieghbaum, H. 1967. Science and the mass media. New York: New York University Press.
11. Lewenstein, B. 1992. Introduction. In When science meets the public, edited by B. Lewenstein, ix-xvi. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
12. Lindlof, T. 1995. Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Logan, R., P. Zengjun, and N. Wilson. 1998. Evaluating assertions about science writing, reporting, and news selection: A content analysis of the Washington Post and Los Angeles Times. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, August, Baltimore, MD.
14. Maienschein, J., and Students. 1999. Commentary: To the future - Arguments for scientific literacy. Science Communication 21:75-87.
15. Marshall, C., and G. Rossman. 1989. Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Miller, J. 1986. Reaching the attentive and interested publics for science. In Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news, edited by S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers, 55-69. New York: Free Press.
17. Nelkin, D. 1995. Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. Rev. ed. New York: Freeman.
18. O'Keefe, T. 1970. The mass media as sources of medical information for doctors. Journalism Quarterly 47:95-100.
19. Paisley, W. 1998. Scientific literacy and the competition for public attention and understanding. Science Communication 20:70-80.
20. Palen, J. 1994. A map for science reporters: Science, technology, and society studies concepts in basic reporting and news writing textbooks. Michigan Academician 26:507-19.
21. Patterson, J. 1982. A Q study of attitudes of young adults about science news. Journalism Quarterly 59:406-13.
22. Press, A. 1991. The impact of television on modes of reasoning. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 8:421-41.
23. Prewitt, K. 1982. The public and science policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values 36:5-14.
24. Shortland, M., and J. Gregory. 1991. Communicating science: A handbook. New York: Longman.
25. Tobey, R. 1971. The American ideology of natural science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
26. Trumbo, C., S. Dunwoody, and R. Griffin. 1998. Journalists, cognition, and the presentation of an epidemiological study. Science Communication 19:238-65.
27. Valenti, J. 1999. Commentary: How well do scientists communicate to media? Science Communication 21:172-78.
28. Ziman, J. 1992. Not knowing, needing to know, and wanting to know. In When science meets the public, edited by B. Lewenstein, 13-20. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.