Quantitative character evolution under complicated sexual systems, illustrated in gynodioecious Fragaria virginiana

American Naturalist

Volumn 162, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 257-264

  Morgan, Martin T ^a   Ashman, Tia Lynn ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Androdioecy; Gynodioecy; Gynomonoecy; Inheritance; Natural selection; Quantitative genetics; Sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; NOTE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

EVOLUTION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTS; REPRODUCTION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

FRAGARIA; FRAGARIA VIRGINIANA;

EID: 0042477516     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/376581     Document Type: Note

References (37)

1. Ahmadi, H., and R. S. Bringhurst. 1989. Genetics of sex expression in Fragaria species. American Journal of Botany 78:504-514.
2. Ashman, T.-L. 1998. Is relative pollen production or removal a good predictor of relative male fitness? an experimental exploration with a wild strawberry (Fragaria virginiana, Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 85:1166-1171.
3. _. 1999. Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12:648-661.
4. _. 2000. Pollinator selectivity and its implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Ecology 81:2577-2591.
5. _. In press. Constraints on the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism: field estimates of quantitative genetic parameters for reproductive traits in three populations of gynodioecious Fragaria virginiana. Evolution.
6. Ashman, T.-L., and C. Diefenderfer. 2001. Sex ratio represents a unique context for selection on attractive traits: consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. American Naturalist 157:334-337.
7. Ashman, T.-L., and M. S. Hitchens. 2000. Dissecting the causes of variation in intra-inflorescence allocation in a sexually polymorphic species, Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 87:197-204.
8. Barrett, S. C. H. 1993. The evolutionary biology of tristyly. Pages 283-326 in D. Futuyma and J. Antonovics, eds. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Barton, N. H., and M. Turelli. 1991. Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 127:229-255.
10. Charlesworth, D., and V. Laporte. 1998. The male-sterility polymorphism of Silene vulgaris: analysis of genetic data from two populations and comparison with Thymus vulgaris. Genetics 150:1267-1282.
11. Charnov, E. L. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
12. Delph, L. F. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in life history. Pages 149-174 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin.
13. _. 2003. Sexual dimorphism in gender plasticity and its consequences for breeding-system evolution. Evolution and Development 5:34-39.
14. Eckhart, V. M. 1993. Do hermaphrodites of gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae) trade off seed production to attract pollinators? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 50:47-63.
15. _. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. Pages 123-148 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin.
16. Ferguson, I. M., and D. J. Fairbairn. 2000. Sex-specific selection and sexual size dimorphism in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13:160-170.
17. Jesson, L. K., and S. C. Barrett. 2002. Solving the puzzle of mirror-image flowers. Nature 417:707.
18. Kelly, J. K. 1999a. Response to selection in partially self-fertilizing populations. I. Selection on a single trait. Evolution 53:336-349.
19. _. 1999b. Response to selection in partially self-fertilizing populations. II. Selection on multiple traits. Evolution 53:350-357.
20. Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314-334.
21. _. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
22. _. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292-305.
23. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 36:1210-1226.
24. Lloyd, D. G. 1974. Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 31:11-34.
25. _. 1976. The transmission of genes via pollen and ovules in gynodioecious angiosperms. Theoretical Population Biology 9:299-316.
26. Maurice, S., and T. H. Fleming. 1995. The effect of pollen limitation on plant reproductive systems and the maintenance of sexual polymorphisms. Oikos 74:55-60.
27. Meagher, T. R. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophylaceae). I. Genetic variation. Evolution 46:445-457.
28. _. 1994. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). II. Response to sex-specific selection. Evolution 48:939-951.
29. Morgan, M. T. 1992. The evolution of traits influencing male and female fertility in outcrossing plants. American Naturalist 139:1022-1051.
30. _. 1994. Models of sexual selection in hermaphrodites, especially plants. American Naturalist 144(suppl.): S100-S125.
31. Morgan, M. T., and D. J. Schoen. 1997. Selection on reproductive characters: floral morphology in Asclepias syriaca. Heredity 79:433-441.
32. Pannell, J. 1997. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in a metapopulation. Evolution 51:10-20.
33. Sassaman, C., and S. C. Weeks. 1993. The genetic mechanism of sex determination in the conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana. American Naturalist 141:314-328.
34. Staudt, G. 1989. The species of Fragaria, their taxonomic and geographical distribution. Acta Horticulturae 265:23-33.
35. Valleau, W. D. 1923. The inheritance of flower types and fertility in the strawberry. American Journal of Botany 10:259-274.
36. Via, S., and R. Lande. 1985. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39:505-522.
37. Weeks, S. C., J. A. Hutchison, and N. Zucker. 2001. Maintenance of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana: do hermaphrodites need males for complete fertilization? Evolutionary Ecology 15:205-221.